backtop


Print 20 comment(s) - last by EasyC.. on Jun 6 at 7:27 AM

Bloomberg says the deal will be valued at $40/share

Just when T-Mobile is knee-deep in forcing the wireless industry leaders (namely AT&T and Verizon Wireless) to copycat nearly every initiative that it implements, we’re hearing word that third-place Sprint is inching even closer to acquiring the company. A new report from Bloomberg states that Sprint Corp. has nearly come to a decision on the final purchase price for T-Mobile US, and is zeroing on a valuation of $40/share.
 
The deal will reportedly comprise of 50 percent stock and 50 percent cash, while parent company Deutsche Telekom AG will retain a 15 percent stake in marriage.
 
Softbank acquired Sprint last year for $21.6 billion (it holds an 80 percent stake in the company), and this upcoming Sprint deal is reportedly valued at around $41 billion. It was reported in late April that Softbank approached Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Comp., Mizuho Financial Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., and Deutsche Bank to secure financing for the acquisition.

John Legere
T-Mobile CEO John Legere, seen here in the black leather jacket. [Image Source: T-Mobile USA]

According to Bloomberg, the merger will be officially announced next month.
 
One of the big decisions that has yet to be made is who will lead the combined company, but we’re hoping that T-Mobile’s animated CEO John Legere gets the nod.

Source: Bloomberg



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

No. NO
By retrospooty on 6/4/2014 8:11:41 PM , Rating: 4
RE: No. NO
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 6/4/2014 8:15:48 PM , Rating: 5
Search your feelings, you know it to be true.


RE: No. NO
By retrospooty on 6/5/2014 8:32:03 AM , Rating: 2
I think my feelings betray me on this one.

Oh well, there is always a new hope. Seeing how T-Mobile added customers at a record rate the past few quarters and Sprint is bleeding customers, maybe they will keep the great programs and general "un-carrier" concept that T-Mo has been running.


RE: No. NO
By Jeffk464 on 6/5/2014 5:20:41 PM , Rating: 4
This deal will only be acceptable if all the sprint execs are fired and replaced with the Tmobile execs.


RE: No. NO
By CrimsonWolf on 6/4/2014 9:07:49 PM , Rating: 2
You were the chosen one!


RE: No. NO
By DiscoWade on 6/4/2014 9:20:10 PM , Rating: 2
If AT&T wasn't allowed to buy T-Mobile, then neither should Sprint! Because of competition, my cellular phone bill has dropped significantly recently. I fear that if competition decreases than my bill will increase.


RE: No. NO
By quiksilvr on 6/4/2014 9:37:48 PM , Rating: 2
AT&T is at a completely different level than Sprint. As a T-Mobile customer I do have my concerns however considering the far superior HSPA+ and LTE network T-Mobile has in comparison to Sprint, I believe that Softbank will realize that T-Mobile's aggressive marketing and pricing scheme will be the one to go with.


RE: No. NO
By hypocrisyforever on 6/5/2014 12:10:58 PM , Rating: 2
Dude, so funny. I literally came to post these 3 exact words and then see it was the first comment. Consider this an upvote.


RE: No. NO
By retrospooty on 6/5/2014 12:40:51 PM , Rating: 2
Heh... I forget who said this or where I saw it, it a few weeks back but it was funny...

Someone was talking about the big 4 US carriers and referred to them as Big Red (Verizon), Oppressive Blue (ATT), Try hard Magenta (T-Mo), and of course, the butt of the Joke , Sprint was "Bumbling Yellow".


How does the merger work?
By zlandar on 6/5/2014 9:08:39 AM , Rating: 2
Sprint uses CDMA and T-Mobile uses GSM.

How is merging going to work with the non-compatible cellular networks and phones?




RE: How does the merger work?
By bigboxes on 6/5/2014 9:16:50 AM , Rating: 2
Many phones can do both. LTE is slowly taking on voice as they add on spectrum. In the end, Sprint will improve in areas where it previously was deficient and T-Mobile will improve it's coverage nationwide. It's a win-win. Well, except for AT&T.


RE: How does the merger work?
By zlandar on 6/5/2014 10:10:04 AM , Rating: 2
True but Sprint and T-Mobile both suck when it comes to cellular coverage outside of major metro areas.

It's a major reason why I would never switch to either one since my work occasionally takes me through rural areas.


RE: How does the merger work?
By Dr of crap on 6/5/2014 12:55:57 PM , Rating: 3
Huh, My Sprint network never fails me and I've been with them for 10 years plus.

I was even in rural Ohio this week and had service and I thought I wouldn't get any!


RE: How does the merger work?
By Solandri on 6/5/2014 2:10:38 PM , Rating: 2
Sprint is actually pretty good in certain cities and decent in rural areas. They have roaming agreements with Verizon and most of their plans include free roaming, so if you're in an area without Sprint coverage you'll just roam on Verizon's network. (Their sensitivity for roaming is way too low though - the phone won't switch to roaming if there's a completely unusable 0-bar Sprint signal. You can "fix" this if you're rooted with an app which lets you manually force roaming.)

Their problem is that when they were first building out their digital network, they contracted with a lot of cheap bidders to build their tower network in many cities. In order to save money, these bidders then spaced the towers as far apart as the communications gear specs said you could put them. The towers perform to spec only in ideal cases, and so Sprint ended up with a bunch of towers which were spaced too far apart for practical use.

Unfortunately once a tower is built, you can't just pick it up and move it. You have to fill the coverage holes in between with a new tower. The net result being your towers are now closer than they would've been if you had spaced them right in the first place, and it's cost you more than if you'd paid a little extra initially. It also causes greater interference since the neighboring towers are closer than they need to be to the tower your phone is transmitting with. Sprint has been in denial over this, and been trying to fix things while building as few additional towers as possible. A lot of their past actions (e.g. selling off parts of their tower network and immediately leasing it back) revolve around this central problem.

If they really want to fix this, they need to re-allocate their tower spacing in the cities where they have poor coverage. A merger with T-Mobile just might make this possible. They can sift through their and T-Mobile's towers and come up with better tower spacing, move their CDMA and T-Mobile's GSM comms gear to those towers, and sell off the towers they don't need anymore.


RE: How does the merger work?
By EasyC on 6/6/2014 7:27:26 AM , Rating: 2
Outside of Boston, I've seen T-Mo have more coverage than Verizon. Hell, the last two places I've lived were in "metro" areas and Verizon had no coverage, but T-Mo and AT&T were full (All the while Verizon's "coverage" map would lead you to believe there was good service).

T-Mo has been building their network out too, I've noticed much more LTE driving up through NH as of late.

I sincerely hope T-Mo becomes the governing body in this merger. I would hate to see what Sprint would do with T-Mo....


RE: How does the merger work?
By retrospooty on 6/5/2014 1:07:59 PM , Rating: 2
Yup... And Sprint did it before with Nextel (GSM) before back when things were 100% incompatible.


Great!
By BRB29 on 6/5/2014 8:39:34 AM , Rating: 3
Please let Tmobile's CEO be CEO after the acquisition. I ran away from Sprint a long time ago for good reasons.




Share Price
By chµck on 6/4/2014 8:58:31 PM , Rating: 2
I remember seeing this IPO at ~$17 :/...




American Exceptionalism
By coburn_c on 6/5/14, Rating: -1
RE: American Exceptionalism
By OutOfTouch on 6/5/2014 3:16:16 PM , Rating: 4
Except T-Mobile has been trying to sell for years. If they didn't want to sell out then we wouldn't be having this conversation.

I don't see anything wrong here - except that I have TMo and left Sprint because they sucked.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki