backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 32 comment(s) - last by Gastrian.. on Jan 7 at 3:55 PM

New plan may allow the iPhone to act as a wireless modem at near broadband speeds

Rumors about Apple are already heating up the blogosphere.  With MacWorld set to kick off tomorrow, there's reports of changes to Apple's PC and notebook lineup, and even rumors of a possible iPhone nano.

Lost amid the noise is a rumor concerning Apple and its partner AT&T, which may seem smaller, but could be a big deal eventually for some iPhone customersTUAW, an Apple blog, is reporting that a trusted source at Apple has confirmed long rumored plans that Apple and AT&T will be announcing a tethering service for the iPhone in the next couple weeks.

With the new service, AT&T would supplement its existing wireless broadband modem offerings, and attempt to gain and upper hand on wireless aircard providers Verizon Wireless and Sprint.

The new service is reported to be offered for an extra $30/month fee, which will include 5 GB of data.  As with other aircards, going over the data cap will likely incur large overages.  To use the service you would simply connect the iPhone to your computer.

The plan, if it is indeed announced, would offer consumers perhaps the most inexpensive source of wireless mobile internet yet.  Competitive mobile data plans employing EV-DO or HSDPA cards from Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T typically run around $60.  Some users with unlocked iPhones have already employed a hack to use the phones as tethers, but the new plan would provide AT&T customers with a legitimate means to do so.

Another hot rumor circulating around the Apple blogosphere is reports that Apple may release a "MegaiPod" sometime in 2009 -- a giant-sized iPod touch.  The new iPod would have a form factor between that of a tablet PC and the current iPod Touch.  The blog site TUAW says that its source substantiated these rumors, but did not say when the big iPod might be arriving.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Unimpressed
By kkwst2 on 1/6/2009 9:28:42 AM , Rating: 4
So, tethering is something I've done with Sprint on my HTC 6700 and Mogul for 3 years without fees. Sprint either doesn't track it or looks the other way as long as you don't go crazy. Works beautifully.

Not sure why I would want to pay an extra $30 per month for it.




RE: Unimpressed
By alphadog on 1/6/2009 10:07:32 AM , Rating: 1
Simple. Because your not a desperate-to-throw-money-out-the-window-for-looks-a nd-status Apple fanboy/girl...


RE: Unimpressed
By dj LiTh on 1/6/2009 2:40:42 PM , Rating: 2
agreed, they lost me at 'extra cost'


RE: Unimpressed
By drebo on 1/6/2009 10:08:57 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I was going to say...I was able to do this with my PPC6600 from 4 years ago. My HTC Mogul does it now, only it's a heck of a lot faster.

Word of caution, though: Don't upgrade to Windows Mobile 6.1 or you'll lose the ability to do this without having PAM added to your account (paying extra).


RE: Unimpressed
By nemoshotyany on 1/6/2009 12:15:02 PM , Rating: 3
That's not true. You can tether with Windows Mobile 6.1 on the Mogul. It's not hard to do and you can find out how to do it on various places throughout the web. I've been doing it since the 3.56 Rom update came out and I haven't paid a dime extra.


RE: Unimpressed
By kkwst2 on 1/6/2009 1:42:00 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, I've been on 6.1 for a couple of months and haven't seen charges. There are some flags in the registry I change but I'm not sure that is actually needed.

Every time an update comes out, there's always a flood of board activity saying "Oh no, tethering is broken." etc. but it hasn't actually happened yet. I'm still not certain whether they have the capability to distinguish the two types of data, or they just look at excessive usage that could go along with tethering.


RE: Unimpressed
By elpresidente2075 on 1/6/2009 10:09:11 AM , Rating: 2
Same thing with my *free* Cingular Sony Ericcson w800i and a standard unlimited data plan. Burns me up that they would like their users to pay not only extra for the phone, but buy an extra data plan so they could do the same.


RE: Unimpressed
By FITCamaro on 1/6/2009 12:19:54 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah people have been using their cell phones as modems since you were able to send data through them. I talked to people using old Samsung 2G A420s as modems when I worked for Sprint in college.

This is nothing new and its pretty sad that iPhone people are so stupid that they'll actually pay a premium to do it.


Wait.... What?
By Ryanman on 1/6/2009 9:11:34 AM , Rating: 3
Apple and AT&T might give their customers something they deserved months ago?

I think I just saw a pig fly past my window...




RE: Wait.... What?
By vapore0n on 1/6/2009 9:20:14 AM , Rating: 3
but only if you pay the premium.

Id just prefer to hack the iphone and have it thether rather than pay twice for the data plan.


RE: Wait.... What?
By Ryanman on 1/6/2009 9:23:46 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
but only if you pay the premium.


And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the punchline to the joke.


RE: Wait.... What?
By othercents on 1/6/2009 12:03:34 PM , Rating: 1
The new global terrorist Apple has it's first ally AT&T. Step 1 build a unique but useless telephone that everyone will want. Step 2 suck all the money they can out of their customers now that they are stuck with the phone and plan. Step 3 take over the world.

Other


iPhone Modem - Free!
By Aeros on 1/6/2009 11:33:58 PM , Rating: 2
I hope before people pay for this they do a little research...

http://www.iphonemodem.com/

Jailbreaking is necessary, but the benefits far outweigh the minimal risk/effort.

As far as "legit" goes... Well they should have made it an open device, so third party apps are fair game for me.




What is the $30 for?
By Gastrian on 1/7/2009 3:55:40 PM , Rating: 2
Is the $30 just for the data tariff or does it also unlock the iPhone for use as a modem?

In the UK our iPhone partner already offers Unlimited Data through G3 on their £45 ($67.23) tariff so will we get this modem facility for free or pay extra for it? If we have to pay for it then its a very ddgy decision as almost every 3G phone in the UK can be used as a modem for no cost other than the data.




BS
By Chaser on 1/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: BS
By DASQ on 1/6/2009 11:36:55 AM , Rating: 3
Did you say 'browser'?

Call me when I don't need 3rd party hacks to get working flash or java.


RE: BS
By Chaser on 1/6/2009 11:45:19 AM , Rating: 2
No thanks. You'd probably still figure out a way to complain.


RE: BS
By DASQ on 1/6/2009 1:12:50 PM , Rating: 2
You think I'm just whining about the browser/iPhone?

Count how many sites you visit on a given day that requires flash for content/navigation. Divide that number by the total number of sites you visit a day. Welcome to the % of the internet that is unavailable to the iPhone/iPod Touch.


RE: BS
By TomCorelis (blog) on 1/6/2009 2:39:04 PM , Rating: 2
Following your logic, I arrived at a figure of 0%.


RE: BS
By Veerappan on 1/6/2009 3:01:12 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. I spend most of my time at work using Opera 9.6 in Solaris on a sparc machine. Flash crashes both opera and firefox on this box, and I find that there's very few sites that cause me problems. Other than movie promo sites, the Snickers website (grr... can't redeem codes when I hit up the vending machine because their site is flash only), and a few others, I can get by without flash just fine.

I do agree that all of the youtube videos and other embedded movies that are placed in articles these days would be nice, but if I need to watch them my iPhone can play youtube movies which is something my work machine can't do.

I'm sorry, but I really couldn't care about Java in a web browser. Rarely do I need it, and usually when I do use it, the experience is underwhelming.


RE: BS
By DASQ on 1/6/2009 3:33:37 PM , Rating: 3
Then your need for flash is 0%.

Not the case for many people, however. I don't use flash that often, I'm just thinking about the greater portion of consumers.


RE: BS
By glennpratt on 1/6/2009 4:24:44 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sorry, but when java and flash become a requirement for a web browser, well the web has failed for me. Frankly, I don't want either on my phone. Waste of money, resources, battery power and a security hazard too. Count me out.

Application plugins are and should remain a niche on the web.


RE: BS
By Gastrian on 1/6/2009 12:12:09 PM , Rating: 1
And can you back up those claims of the iPhone being the best selling consumer phone? According to Gartner for the 3rd Quarter of 2008 Apple only had 12.9% of the smartphone which is considerably smaller than the non smartphone market.


RE: BS
RE: BS
By Gastrian on 1/7/2009 2:07:05 PM , Rating: 2
So not only are you basing "ever" on the American market only (which you didn't state in your post)but you are basing it on an article that doesn't even back you up.

quote:
Now the phone as achieved an even loftier accolade, dethroning Motorola's Razr as the best-selling phone in America for Q3 2008.

The new data, coming from NPD (the leading wireless research firm), represents the first time in 3 years that the best-selling Razr failed to top the list.


So based on your post "ever" is now a time period covering Q3 2008. Regardless that the Razr, not the iPhone was the best seller in Q2 2008, Q1 2008, Q4 2007, Q3 2007, Q2 2007, Q1 2007, Q4 2006, Q3 2006, Q2 2006, Q1 2006, Q4 2005, Q3 2005 and Q2 2005 the iPhone is "best selling consumer phone ever" because it topped the charts for one quarter. Whats worse is that someone rated you up based on that logic.


RE: BS
By Chaser on 1/7/2009 3:03:19 PM , Rating: 1
Get back to those flies you pull the wings off of. good god. get over it.


RE: BS
By Gastrian on 1/7/2009 3:25:46 PM , Rating: 2
Thank you for your insightful and well thought out riposte. I must conceed that my post based on fact and reading an article before linking it to back-up my claim falters in the sight of the magnitude of perfection that is your response. Bravo my dear sir, bravo.


RE: BS
By theapparition on 1/6/2009 12:14:17 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It's the most popular consumer phone ever, recently surpassing the Motorola razor in sales numbers.

Yeah, good job Apple finally surpassing the sales of a 6 year old design.


RE: BS
By Chaser on 1/6/2009 12:30:34 PM , Rating: 1
And your phone still doesn't. Congrats to you too.


RE: BS
By theapparition on 1/6/2009 1:38:16 PM , Rating: 2
Oh right, I forgot, I need the masses to tell me what to buy and use.

I could care less if my phone is a hit.


RE: BS
By Chaser on 1/6/2009 2:36:30 PM , Rating: 1
Only caring enough to be comparing designs and their lifespans apparently.


RE: BS
By Rodney McNaggerton on 1/6/2009 6:56:51 PM , Rating: 2
DT ya need to put this in perspective. If you got the phone as a modem feature for $30, you would still be forking over a lot more money than at sprint, if they offered a similar feature.
If we wanted to compare an AT&T plan to a sprint plan, with all the same features, we would find that the AT&T plan is already a lot more expensive, which is perhaps why the added features could be so inexpensive. For example:
For unlimited text, picture messages, video messages, tv, internet and unlimited talk time on AT&T it would cost
149.99 at AT&T while it would cost 99.99 at sprint. This ~$50 difference is what would allow that to be priced so low. That is all there is to my argument.

I don't want to get flamed so I'll explain how I calculated my numbers. I went with the AT&T Unlimited Talk plan($99.99) and added the data plan for the iphone($30) and the unlimited texting plan for the iphone($20). With the sprint plans I went with the Unlimited Everything plan (99.99) that gives you all the same features as the AT&T plan as well as internet at tv on your phone, so no wonder they would be able to offer the modem for only $30.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki