Obama Administration Gives Apple its Blessing to Ban Older Samsung Products
October 9, 2013 2:15 PM
Obama administration had denied a similar ban on Apple products for Samsung
According to the
U.S. International Trade Commission
(ITC), the highest trade-specific court in the U.S., both Apple, Inc. (
) and Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) are guilty of violating patent law with their smartphones.
I. Apple Scores with the International Trade Commission
Apple was found to have
refused to pay even a small fee
to license Samsung standards patents, which Samsung openly offered. Samsung was found to have
violated non-standards patents
that Apple had no obligation to license. To the ITC, both Samsung and Apple appeared to be guilty, and hence it ordered preliminary injunctions banning some products from both companies.
After Steven P. Jobs, late Apple cofounder and CEO,
served personally as the digital campaign manager
for Obama in early 2011, the Obama administration had no trouble giving Apple its blessing to ban multiple products from Samsung, just weeks after it committed to the rare decision to overturn a similar ban on older Apple devices.
Obama's trade appointee shot down a ban on iPhones and iPads, despite a preliminary finding of patent infringement by the ITC. [Image Source: Sodahead]
In September Samsung wrote to the President asking him to treat it like he treated Apple,
The world is watching how Samsung is treated by the United States in this ‘smartphone war’ and the administration has a significant interest in avoiding the perception of favoritism and protectionism toward U.S. companies.
But the plea for equal treatment fell on deaf ears. Late Tuesday, U.S. Trade Ambassador/Representative Michael B. G. Froman, appointed by President Barack Obama to monitor trade court decisions and other matters, announced the decision to allow Apple's ban of Samsung. He
The nationality of the companies involved played no role in the review process.
After carefully weighing policy considerations, including the impact on consumers and competition, advice from agencies, and information from interested parties. I have decided to allow the Commission's determination in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof, Investigation No. 337-TA-796, to become final.
II. What's Banned?
And with that, the following devices are now banned from shipment into the U.S., enforced by the
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Samsung smartphones (6)
Galaxy S 4G
Samsung tablets (2)
the original Galaxy Tab
the new Galaxy Tab 10.1
This is the second major ban
of Android devices by Apple to be ordered by the ITC and enforced by the CBP; the first was of HTC Corp.'s (
) smartphones in 2012. That ban helped to cripple HTC, sending it into a
sales and financial free-fall
The ITC ban on Samsung devices comes based on the violation of two patents -- one of which covers a headphone jack, and another which details capacitive multi-touch. The latter patent is
U.S. Patent No. 7,912,501
"Audio I/O headset plug and plug detection circuitry" (often referred to as the '501 patent in shorthand), while the second is the
"Steve Jobs' multi-touch" patent
U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949
"Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics" (the '949 patent) -- which has some claims which are currently in the process of being invalidated.
The final ruling comes from a three judge ITC panel that reviewed
a previous decision
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Thomas Pender
III. Is Apple Above the Law?
In many ways the Obama administration's decision not to overrule the legal experts at the ITC in the case of the ban on Samsung devices is not at all atypical. Rather it is the decision to overrule the ban on Apple devices that is extraordinarily atypical.
The pro-Apple decision marked the first time since 1987 that a U.S. trade representative had overruled an ITC preliminary injunction. And many argue that the decision sets a dangerous precedent as the ITC had found that Apple engaged in a rare and rather audacious kind of corporate misbehavior.
In the technology industry companies cooperate to develop standards, which are then patented by those who worked on them. Those patents are governed under so called fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, which require companies to offer licensing at a low rate to anyone who wants them, a policy that is supposed to prevent a barrier to market entry.
In practice FRAND licensing rates in today's hyper-litigious atmosphere are exceptionally low -- as little as
1/10,000th of a non-FRAND patent
. The overarching message set by today's intellectual property system is that it's better
to cooperate, as you're wasting your time on essentially worthless intellectual property.
Apple could have paid fractions of a penny per device to license Samsung's patents, but it chose to instead give itself a five fingered discount. [Image Source: SomanyMP3s]
What is quite extraordinary is that Apple had a virtually sure-fire ban on Samsung's devices as its patents were vague, broad, and most importantly had no FRAND commitments. It could have made the win entirely one-sided if it simply offered to license Samsung's FRAND patents, which Samsung willingly offered to spur licensing talks.
But rather than pay fractions of a penny per iPhone and iPad to avoid a potential ban like virtually every other company has, Apple refused to license Samsung's IP. Hence the ITC ruled that Apple had committed the very unusual offense of reverse holdup, allowing Samsung to ban older iPhones and iPads with FRAND IP.
The last time the President's appointees overturned an ITC ban (1987) computers looked like this. [Image Source: Bowie Songs]
The Obama administration's ruling seemingly greenlights the abuse of FRAND IP via refusal to pay licensing fees, as it willfully ignored the ITC's findings of reverse holdup.
Samsung is now left to shuffle its product lineup. A representative said that her company was "disappointed", adding, "It will serve only to reduce competition and limit choice for the American consumer."
That may be true, but it is reasonably clear that Samsung violated the law, as arbitrary and unfair as that law may be. What is much more troubling and extraordinary is that the Obama administration committed to a "veto" of a court decision the likes of which had not been done in over 25 years, and in doing so effectively ruled that Apple was above the law.
Fly on the Wall
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
HTC Admits it Has a Communication Problem, Eyes Windows Phone Escape Route
October 8, 2013, 1:19 PM
USPTO Moves "Steve Jobs" Multitouch Patent a Step Away from the Trash Can
December 10, 2012, 10:26 AM
ITC Judge Says Samsung Violated Four Apple Patents
October 25, 2012, 8:39 PM
Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
August 24, 2012, 5:56 PM
Apple's Samsung Tablet Ban Upheld, HTC Phone Ban is Rejected
July 3, 2012, 6:45 PM
Xiaomi Mi 6 - Flash Sale on April 28 in China
April 26, 2017, 7:45 AM
Apple Watch NikeLab Limited Edition unveiled.
April 22, 2017, 6:20 AM
What is the Apple’s iPhone 8 specifications and release date?
April 14, 2017, 5:43 AM
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 tablet with Hexa –Core SoC, Android Marshmallow
April 6, 2017, 6:40 AM
Vivo launches V5 Plus IPL edition smartphone
April 4, 2017, 11:10 AM
Samsung S8 and S8 Plus: On Sale April 21 at Major Wireless Dealers
March 30, 2017, 7:35 AM
Most Popular Articles
Surface Pro 5 Rumors - New Release Date and Price
April 22, 2017, 6:45 AM
SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 580 8GD5 – Great Value for the Money
April 20, 2017, 7:47 AM
Apple Watch NikeLab Limited Edition unveiled.
April 22, 2017, 6:20 AM
Dell Inspiron 17 7000 – A Premium Laptop featuring 7th Gen Intel Core i7 in a 2-in-1 Frame.
April 19, 2017, 7:45 AM
Meet the Smartphone with four cameras - Alcatel Flashphone
April 5, 2017, 11:20 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Google Co-Founder, Sergey Brin has an Airship
Apr 26, 2017, 6:43 AM
Samsung Galaxy S8 and S8 Plus – Lots of Glass that Breaks Easily
Apr 25, 2017, 7:20 AM
Samsung Galaxy S8 – Warning for Pet Owners
Apr 24, 2017, 5:59 AM
Sound Bars and the Costs?
Apr 23, 2017, 6:30 AM
Link your Brain to Your Computer – In Four Years…Maybe
Apr 22, 2017, 7:03 AM
Google Home can now identify users by their voice.
Apr 21, 2017, 7:15 AM
Amazon Lex – Now Available for Developers.
Apr 20, 2017, 6:58 AM
You can now use Instagram offline on your Android Smartphone
Apr 19, 2017, 8:00 AM
Now you can livestream to YouTube from your mobile device.
Apr 18, 2017, 8:05 AM
Google Home – Is It a Spy Device?
Apr 17, 2017, 7:30 AM
Apple added to self –driving test permit list
Apr 15, 2017, 6:21 AM
Project Scorpio – Coming on June 11
Apr 14, 2017, 6:20 AM
Looks Like Samsung Has Been Forgiven.
Apr 13, 2017, 6:50 AM
United Airlines - Blasted on China’s Social Network and the Stock Market
Apr 12, 2017, 6:50 AM
Amazon's Third-Party Sellers Hacked
Apr 11, 2017, 6:25 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro5 Details Revealed
Apr 9, 2017, 6:41 AM
Own An Android Phone? Then you could be hacked over Wi-FI
Apr 7, 2017, 6:47 AM
Apple confirms iOS 10.3 bug and its effect on iCloud Services
Apr 6, 2017, 6:30 AM
Apple Rolls Out New Version of Apple Music
Apr 5, 2017, 10:35 AM
Apple in the News
Apr 4, 2017, 9:03 AM
Apple iPhones Will Soon Feature Graphics Chips Designed BY Apple
Apr 3, 2017, 6:23 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2017 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information