backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by tential.. on Jan 1 at 4:02 AM


My Interest Cards
Smart TVs to take center stage at CES 2013,

LG is on the verge of unveiling a new line of smart TVs at CES 2013. The company is prepared to unveil its CINEMA 3-D Smart TV line at the show. The TV series will offer easier content access and sharing along with an updated Magic Remote and simplified user interface.
 
Highlights of the new TV series will include an 84” Ultra HD TV and a 55” OLED TV.

One of the key features of the redesigned user interface from LG are My Interest Cards. These are folders were users can place apps and other content they enjoy to help organize their favorite things. LG has also redesigned and fine-tuned the Magic Remote. The remote has a pointer function, navigation wheel supports gestures, and supports voice-recognition. The Voice Mate software used for voice-recognition has been updated and is able to recognize the natural flow of speech.

The TVs will also support new connectivity options including WiDi and Miracast. The TVs will also support Tag On that immediately connects two devices for fast media sharing. That means users with smartphones supporting the technology will be able to hold the device against the NFC sticker on the Smart TV to transfer content.

“LG always strives to provide the most engaging, most convenient user experience to consumers all over the globe,” said Havis Kwon, President and CEO of the LG Home Entertainment Company. “We have been singularly uncompromising, both in developing and improving the LG Smart TV platform. As a result, we are confident the UX our 2013 models will shatter all expectations and demonstrate that LG has moved the medium of Smart TV forward.”


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Spoiler
By spread on 12/31/2012 10:51:05 AM , Rating: 1
The new TVs are going to have an awful interface, poor app selection and be very clumsy to use. If you want the remote to use the smart TV features that will be extra money please.




RE: Spoiler
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 12/31/2012 10:55:41 AM , Rating: 4
Do any of you guys here actually use "Smart TV" functionality? I think my TV has Netflix built in, but since I use Amazon Prime, it just goes to waste anyway.


RE: Spoiler
By GreenEnvt on 12/31/2012 11:22:27 AM , Rating: 2
We just started using one for Skype at work. One of our smaller conference rooms we put a Samsung smarttv and webcam into. It has much more professional video conferencing equipment (lifesize) in it already, but it doesn't work with Skype which is what many of our employees want to use to communicate with field staff.

Seems to work well so far.


RE: Spoiler
By n0b0dykn0ws on 12/31/2012 11:30:26 AM , Rating: 2
I tried Amazon Instant Video (Prime subscriber) with my Panasonic TC-P50S30, and it was ridiculously slow and clumsy.

The load times were horrible, then once loaded it was hard to search for anything.

With my PS3 and HTPC I haven't touched it again.

n0b0dykn0ws


RE: Spoiler
By imaheadcase on 12/31/2012 12:01:17 PM , Rating: 2
Most people I know just stream content they want from another PC. Be in media PC, home server, or just whatever content on a extra drive. Legal? maybe not. Easier to use than most other offerings? double yep.


RE: Spoiler
By V-Money on 12/31/2012 4:06:06 PM , Rating: 2
I have a Samsung with the smart tv functionality. I used to use it before I got a PS3, but now I just use the PS3 for all my streaming needs. It works, its a little slower than the PS3 but not so much that I would never use it. I just found using the PS3 is easier because for some reason if I use the "smart tv" I can't change the screen ratio, which since I have a plasma I try to use as much of the screen as possible (I don't watch tv or play games on the tv, so all I watch is netflix and amazon prime).

It also helps that the tv links up with the PS3 automatically so I an use the tv remote to control the PS3. In fact it was funny because I had to get a charging cable for the ps3 controller recently since I hadn't used the actual controller in almost a year and it was completely dead (I switched back to PC gaming after the Steam deals from last christmas, since then I still have dozens of games I haven't finished playing yet. Steam is awesome).


RE: Spoiler
By conejo99 on 12/31/2012 4:10:07 PM , Rating: 2
I have two LG models both about 2 years old. The smart TV functionality is so bad that I bought a couple WD TV Lives to use for Netflix.


RE: Spoiler
By GulWestfale on 12/31/2012 9:52:21 PM , Rating: 2
my father in germany bought a samsung smart TV a couple of years ago. he has never even hooked it up to the internet, since he has no idea what it does or how it works. he just bought it because they told him it's the best in the store.

i think most people who buy smart TVs are like my father: they know very little about technology, have too much money, and are easily impressed by buzzwords. the rest of us will continue hooking our xbox/PS3/tablet to our TVs and be happy.


RE: Spoiler
By tential on 1/1/2013 4:02:03 AM , Rating: 2
I agree. My TV has some smart TV features as well. They've never been used.

When I bought my TV I was sure to ask around and I was recommended to get the model without the smart TV features to save money. I read reviews about the slow interfaces, etc. In the end, I use my Xbox 360 to hook up to Amazon Prime, HBOGO, and ESPN (if I wanna watch sports on my xbox 360, you can watch 2 sports at the same time too). I also have my PC hooked up to watch movies stored on that. All of this is much more efficient than using the interface on the TV, which I've found from using my TVs at home that they were horrible and rarely worked well.

Smart TV is a "Your tv CAN do this", but the real question is does it actually do it well? They may tell you yes, but we all know the real answer is no, it can't actually do it well. And if you don't have one device that can't do all the functionality of your Smart TV, hooked up to your TV, you probably don't use your TV all that much anyway IMO.


This comment will get voted down but...
By aurareturn on 12/31/12, Rating: 0
RE: This comment will get voted down but...
By StevoLincolnite on 12/31/2012 11:33:08 AM , Rating: 2
You make it sound like other companies are incapable of innovating besides Apple, which simply is not true.

Smart TV's are new, the markets will decide what stays and goes, innovation will occur whether Apple existed or not.


RE: This comment will get voted down but...
By aurareturn on 12/31/2012 11:47:28 AM , Rating: 1
Not saying other companies cannot innovate. They can build a better product but it might still not drag an industry along like the way Apple can.

Apple basically invented the modern smartphone. They invented a whole new market with tablets and there are talks of them replacing the laptop.

I'm looking at Apple to lead the TV revolution.


By Cheesew1z69 on 12/31/2012 11:57:58 AM , Rating: 2
they "invented" nothing....


RE: This comment will get voted down but...
By menting on 12/31/2012 12:36:47 PM , Rating: 3
Apple did not "invent" the modern smartphone. They kicked off the smartphone revolution, but they did not invent it by far.

What Apple has going for them right now is a rabid following of followers, so if they come out with a iTV, they will sell millions regardless of quality. Just look at the iPad Mini as an example. So they might be able to help along the 4k or 8k TV adaption, but it will have nothing to do with their ability to innovate.


RE: This comment will get voted down but...
By Flunk on 12/31/2012 12:40:16 PM , Rating: 2
You could possibly argue that the Newton was the precursor to all modern smartphones. But that goes equally well for the Blackberry. Since smartphones are the convergence of several different classes of device (PDA,phone,music player).

Apple does deserve some credit for the iPhone design, a lot of other devices owe a lot of their design language to the iPhone. As for it being the first smartphone ever, that's patently untrue.


RE: This comment will get voted down but...
By aurareturn on 12/31/2012 12:59:05 PM , Rating: 2
There you nerds go.

Newton was not the precursor to all modern smartphones. It's the big bang that created all the necessary ingredients for the smartphone.

The hate for Apple is strong here but stop denying that they DID invent the modern smartphone. The smartphone wouldn't even not be what it is today without the iPhone 2G.


By momorere on 12/31/2012 1:15:06 PM , Rating: 3
LOLZ is all I have to say. You silly Macolytes and your belief that crApple invented all things technological. I guess your beloved iPhone somehow being released in 2007 pre-dates all other prior smartphones, especially The Simon for 1992. This site even breaks down who actually invented what. Take notice how crApple uses all things in the iPhone.

http://mmcneil.com/2012/01/who-really-invented-the...

I personally couldn't care less about smartphones but I'm just sick and tired of everyone acting as if crApple invented everything. My phone can't even use the internet and has a 1.2mp camera.


By TakinYourPoints on 12/31/2012 9:23:09 PM , Rating: 3
Most other companies are incapable of executing as well, big difference.

Inventing a tech and implementing it well are two different things.


Seriously???
By mutatio on 1/1/2013 2:57:54 AM , Rating: 2
So the innovation for Samsung is to be able to walk your smartphone up to the TV, touch it to the NFC badge, and then be able to transfer content? Does anyone else see how brain-dead this idea is? "Yes, I as a consumer want my smartphone, made by the same manufacturer, to be able to transfer data once I get off the couch and walk across the room to make something happen between the devices." I believe remote controls were invented to negate the whole getting up to monkey with the TV scenario. This is right up there with their superbowl ad claiming that the next great thing was the return of the stylus. Idiots.




Seriously???
By mutatio on 1/1/2013 3:01:01 AM , Rating: 2
So the innovation for the set is to be able to walk your smartphone up to the TV, touch it to the NFC badge, and then be able to transfer content? Does anyone else see how brain-dead this idea is? "Yes, I as a consumer want my smartphone to be able to transfer data once I get off the couch and walk across the room to make something happen between the devices." I believe remote controls were invented to negate the whole getting up to monkey with the TV scenario. Idiots.




"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki