backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 81 comment(s) - last by snyper256.. on Aug 30 at 12:56 PM

Dawn raid posts music blogger behind bars

27-year-old Kevin Cogill of Culver City, California made quite a stir last June, when he posted leaked copies of nine tracks from Guns ‘n’ Roses’ upcoming album, “Chinese Democracy,” to his music blog Antiquiet for streaming. His actions earned him an investigation by the F.B.I., however, which eventually arrested Cogill in his home Wednesday, on suspicion of violating federal copyright laws.

The leak, posted June 18, quickly crashed Antiquiet’s servers and was taken down soon after – but not before attracting the attention of publications like Rolling Stone, TIME, and Wired, as well as radio stations on Sirius and Sky News UK. Cogill, who also writes under the name Kevin Skwerl, described a seemingly amicable-but-creepy series of encounters with F.B.I. agents – whom he says he fully cooperated with – before his arrest at 6:59 Wednesday morning.

Cogill appeared for arraignment at a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles later in the day, and his bail was set at $5,000. Antiquiet writer Britney Bernstein noted that bail was initially set to be $50,000, before his defense lawyer talked it down and reportedly scolded the court for allowing Cogill to be “accosted by five F.B.I. agents” instead of being ordered to appearing by a summons.

While he is not sure who had an F.B.I. investigation opened against him, Cogill said he was contacted by frontman Axl Rose’s lawyer before the investigation began.

The Family Entertainment and Copyright Act (FECA), signed into law in 2005, spilled a handful of copyright-infringing activities – of which pre-release leaking is one – over from civil courts, into criminal ones. First time offenders can face up to three years in prison. Cogill’s arrest is the third such prerelease-related arrest nationwide that resulted from FECA.

FECA also includes provisions to stop camcording, or the practice of videotaping movies while they play in a theater. Its provisions reflect a worldwide initiative on behalf of content owners to crack down on prerelease leakers of all kinds, and the last few years have seen a surge of arrests both inside the country and out.

Kathy Leodler, the RIAA’s director of investigations for its regional office in Los Angeles, hinted that more are on the way:

“The arrest of Kevin Cogill is great for the recording industry related to our online investigations,” she said. “We are very pleased with the F.B.I.'s interest and the U.S. attorney's office's aggressiveness in pursuing this investigation. We think we'll see more and more of these pre-release cases.”

Digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation says the law is being misapplied, however: legislators were targeting “commercial pirates selling ‘Harry Potter,’ not this guy in Culver City,” said staff attorney Corynne McSherry.

Writing in Antiquiet, Cogill says he expected arrest to come at any time.

“I’ve been asked if my legal troubles are over. The answer is that they haven’t begun. I’ve only been questioned thus far. Any day now, I could get served with papers,” he said in a post dated June 29. “All I can do in the meantime is hope for the best, and get back to business as usual.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What a waste...
By Proteusza on 8/28/2008 8:14:39 AM , Rating: 5
Q: How many highly trained and skilled FBI agents does it take to arrest a man who released music early, when up till now he has cooperated fully with the investigation?

A: Ask the RIAA how many they think it should take.

Its pretty sad to see that the government and law enforcement are towing the corporate line so faithfully.

But maybe I didnt know how serious a crime releasing music early. Had he just broken into Axl's house and stolen it manually he would have got lighter treatment.




RE: What a waste...
By Oxygenthief on 8/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: What a waste...
By nvalhalla on 8/28/2008 8:35:31 AM , Rating: 3
He didn't say he didn't know it was a crime, just not how serious. If you stole someones checkbook and wrote bad checks all over town (a terrible analogy), you would also probably get a lighter sentence. Hell the bank I was working at got robbed a while back and the guy was sentenced yesterday to 5 years. For armed robbery!


RE: What a waste...
By Oxygenthief on 8/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: What a waste...
By ebakke on 8/28/2008 9:23:07 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
...what do you guys think?
I think your rant went on for too long.


RE: What a waste...
By BarkHumbug on 8/28/2008 9:43:05 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
I also believe that someone committing armed robery should have their hands chopped off and sentanced to 20 years in prison. And since all our prisons are over crowded as is I say we execute all the violent offenders, whack off the willies of all the sex offenders, and remove the hands of all thieves (to include rich Enron CEO types). For all the others just brand their crime onto their forehead.


Sounds like what the Talibans were doing and look where it got them.


RE: What a waste...
By murphyslabrat on 8/28/2008 10:52:22 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Sounds like what the Talibans were doing and look where it got them.

Cutting off rapist's and molester's, *ahem*, "willies" isn't what got the Taliban where it is. That would be an extreme and violently defensive isolationist standpoint, along with their flagrant disregard for human-rights.

Should such permanent repercussions be allowed in the US? I don't know. Do I agree with this form of punishment? Hell, yes.


RE: What a waste...
By Oxygenthief on 8/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: What a waste...
By MrSmurf on 8/28/2008 2:06:04 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think the Bush administration can spell Taliban.


RE: What a waste...
By wvh on 8/28/2008 10:45:29 AM , Rating: 5
... coming from an oxygenthief... :-P


RE: What a waste...
By Oxygenthief on 8/29/08, Rating: 0
RE: What a waste...
By maverick85wd on 8/28/2008 3:40:56 PM , Rating: 3
First of all, reference this great DT article on the usage of analogies for priacy:

http://www.dailytech.com/Enough+with+the+Cheesy+Pi...

Second, you are completely missing the point. This guy committed a civil crime. For that, he should probably be made to think long and hard about what he did, maybe put on probation for 6 months, perhaps a little community service. The only reason for that is because he pre-released music. I'm all for music downloading for personal use, but that really is a little crappy. Instead, he was arrested by FIVE FBI AGENTS! And now he may face up to three years in prison. For sharing music.

Sorry man, but get the hell out of town. He does not deserve to go to jail... if for no other reason than I personally don't think my tax dollars are being well used to keep this dangerous music streamer in prison for three years. And the use of federal resources (especially ones as costly as FBI agents) should never be used in the interest of a private organization (like the RIAA).


RE: What a waste...
By mmntech on 8/28/2008 9:43:30 AM , Rating: 3
The justice system has some problems. The irony is how unbalanced the punishment is. There were a couple of high profile cases here where two men were downloading and making thousands of child pornography images and videos available on P2P servers. At its very core, the crime shares a lot in common with piracy in terms of how it's obtained and distributed. Sentences for these two crimes were 18 months and 20 months, where as a typical sentence for piracy is 60 months, three times as much. Of course we know child pornography is a much more serious crime that piracy. Why are the punishments for piracy so much more extreme? Piracy is a financial crime. It doesn't cause physical or life long emotional harm to someone. Downloading or distributing songs is being put on the same levels as serious indictable crimes where as the real criminals who are doing real harm are basically getting off scot free. I'm not condoning piracy but it is sickening that it's treated as a more serious crime than child abuse.


RE: What a waste...
By AnnihilatorX on 8/28/2008 10:05:37 AM , Rating: 3
I don't disagree with most of what you said, but you have a fallancy in your logic.

The fact that those men you mentioned were sharing their pirated child abuse images and videos are actually hurting the real criminals behind the child abuse, since they get less income.


RE: What a waste...
By JustTom on 8/28/2008 10:21:06 AM , Rating: 2
I would really like a citation for these sentences. The federal minimum sentence for distributing child pornography is 5 years. From the DOJ website.

" Individuals arrested and charged in connection with this initiative are, of course, presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The maximum federal sentence for the distribution of child pornography is 20 years in prison. The PROTECT Act, enacted on April 30, 2003, also created a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison for this crime. If an individual committed a prior sex abuse offense, the mandatory minimum is 15 years in prison and the statutory maximum is 40 years."

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/May/04_crm_331.ht...

It is possible the convictions you speak of are prior to the change in the law or the convictions were in a state court. But it is not valid to compare federal sentencing to state sentencing since they have differing guidelines.

The sentences imposed on the federal level for distributing child pornography are much more severe than typical sentences for content piracy. There is no justification in saying that the legal system puts content piracy on an equal footing as distribution of child pornography either in sentencing or resources allocated.


RE: What a waste...
By weskurtz0081 on 8/28/2008 9:47:35 AM , Rating: 2
Oxygenthief,

Interesting analogy, but I must say, it's not the same as stealing someones check book. This guy may have cost them some sales, but it was money that they DIDN'T currently have. Stealing someones check book and buying stuff would be stealing..... money they did have.


RE: What a waste...
By bhieb on 8/28/2008 10:01:16 AM , Rating: 2
Ok so say he breaks into your mail and steals your paychecks (you haven't cashed em yet)... that one better?


RE: What a waste...
By Zandros on 8/28/2008 10:10:27 AM , Rating: 2
No. It's more like you doing voluntary work, and your boss might be thinking about giving you something nice for christmas as a reward, and then this guy comes and talks him out of it.


RE: What a waste...
By napalmjack on 8/28/08, Rating: 0