backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 31 comment(s) - last by Targon.. on Sep 16 at 7:17 AM

Electronic Arts gives up on merging with competitor Take-Two Interactive

Electronic Arts has abandoned its bid to acquire Take-Two Interactive. For the past six months Electronic Arts has been attempting to acquire its competitor. In February, Electronic Arts put forward a formal offer to acquire Take-Two Interactive in an all-cash merger valued at approximately $2.0 billion at $26 per share. Take-Two rejected that offer and all subsequent offers claiming the bids undervalued the value of the company. In August, Electronic Arts and Take-Two signed a confidentiality agreement after agreeing to hold private talks about a potential deal.

In a press release on Sunday, Electronic Arts made their intention to abandon the deal clear:

While EA continues to have a high regard for Take-Two's creative teams and products, after careful consideration, including a management presentation and review of other due diligence materials provided by Take-Two Interactive Software Inc., EA has decided not to make a proposal to acquire Take-Two and has terminated discussions with Take-Two.

Take Two was unapologetic in their response stating the Electronic Arts offer as unsolicited and rejected by their stockholders:

Strauss Zelnick, Chairman of the Board of Take-Two, commented, "We remain focused on creating value for our stockholders and our consumers. This has been our goal since EA launched its conditional and unsolicited bid six months ago, a bid which was repeatedly rejected by our stockholders. As part of that commitment, we remain actively engaged in discussions with other parties in the context of our formal process to consider strategic alternatives.

Electronic Arts initial acquisition offer came just two months before the official launch of Grand Theft Auto 4, Take Two’s flagship game. The expected success of Grand Theft Auto 4 may have influenced Take Two’s decision to hold off on a merger in the hopes of a better deal.

Slower than expected sales of Grand Theft Auto 4, which launched on April 29, may have weakened Take Two’s bargaining position and played a role in Electronic Arts decision to abandon the acquisition. According to a CNN article, NPD rankings listed Grand Theft Auto 4 as the 46th best-selling game in August -- down from 45th place in July. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Awww...
By PlasmaBomb on 9/15/2008 7:47:22 AM , Rating: 1
Sucks to be EA ;)




RE: Awww...
By FITCamaro on 9/15/2008 8:03:50 AM , Rating: 5
Is good to be us. I for one would like to see at least one good developer not become part of EA. We've already lost BioWare to EA's black hole of a games making business.

I wonder if the EA management realizes just how much most gamers despise them or they just don't give a damn.


RE: Awww...
By MaulBall789 on 9/15/2008 8:25:20 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
I wonder if the EA management realizes just how much most gamers despise them or they just don't give a damn.


That would be the latter, they don't give a damn.


RE: Awww...
By Hiawa23 on 9/15/2008 8:39:09 AM , Rating: 4
I wonder if the EA management realizes just how much most gamers despise them or they just don't give a damn.

Like most companies, they don't give a damn what you think of them, & apparently most don't despise them cause last month, Madden sold 1mill copies on the X360, & another 500-600k on the PS3, & another 400k & some change on the PS2, so what you think of them matters not, just keep buying their games.

I, foreone, love all the EA racers & honestly I have no beef with EA as like any other dev/pub, there are some games I like from them & some I don't.

I am glad they did not buy Take 2 cause NBA 2k>>>>>>>>>>>>& gt;>>>Live every since the Dreamcast days & that's the only basketball game I buy.

If you can't beat the comp, you secure the NFL rights then attempt to buy them alltogether, that's just the way it goes, but I am glad this one failed. Competition is always better for the consumer.


RE: Awww...
By FITCamaro on 9/15/2008 9:38:37 AM , Rating: 2
Stupidity is no replacement for trust.


RE: Awww...
By Adonlude on 9/15/2008 2:48:48 PM , Rating: 2
Sucks to be a Take Two share holder. They just lost their wallets today!


RE: Awww...
By sprockkets on 9/15/2008 5:34:02 PM , Rating: 2
The share price went back down to its previous level before the merger speculation. No big deal in the long run.

Again, the bull---- that makes up the stock market. Business as usual.


RE: Awww...
By gyranthir on 9/15/2008 10:20:53 AM , Rating: 2
People bought Madden because there is no other choice.

It's "maddening" that there is no other option, because of the exclusive contract that the NFL has with EA.


RE: Awww...
By jRaskell on 9/15/2008 10:37:04 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Competition is always better for the consumer.


Perhaps you need a better understanding of just how EA is trying to eliminate that competition.


RE: Awww...
By omnicronx on 9/15/2008 11:10:42 AM , Rating: 3
Have you played Madden 09? That game is damn addictive. Most people do not hate EA! The ability to sell a sports game year after year shows this. Who cares about rights, if a game is bad people will not buy it, if EA does not sell a tons of the Madden franchise they will lose their sole rights next time around (that's a lot of incentive).

Although I personally agree that almost all sections of EA except for sports are lacking, I have to totally disagree with your statement that most gamers hate EA. Gaming has reached an all time high, with novice and inexperienced users diving into games like the Sims, (over and over). You can't just merely say that because the hard core gaming crowd generally does not like EA, that the majority of gamers do too, just don't care, as long as they are having fun.

Face it, EA games now curtail to casual gamers and sports, if you want storyline or you are a hardcore gamer, then EA is obviously not the company for you.


RE: Awww...
By Targon on 9/16/2008 7:17:34 AM , Rating: 2
There are several different parts of EA, and the publishing branch is the worst of the bunch. The way they manage the development teams is also why EA is a fairly horrible company.

They do NOT believe in making games for adults. I am NOT talking porn, I am talking about games with the target audience being adults. Picture a movie industry where the content never gets above a PG level.

It is also about watered down games that can work on both consoles as well as the PC, you get nothing that is really cutting edge because everything has to be aimed for the lowest common denominator. So, you get games which are limited to what the controllers of a game console, and anything that would push the limits of PC hardware will be cut way back because an Xbox 360 wouldn't be able to cut it.
Yes, from a business perspective they want to aim for the largest possible audience, but they still have made the game market feel like there is NOTHING for an adult that EA will ever publish.


RE: Awww...
By Samus on 9/16/2008 6:30:10 AM , Rating: 2
thank God.


RE: Awww...
By Polynikes on 9/15/2008 10:52:38 AM , Rating: 2
They don't care, they're laughing all the way to the bank. Most gamers (console gamers, primarily, cough) don't realize or care about EA's practices.


RE: Awww...
By Sulphademus on 9/15/2008 8:23:38 AM , Rating: 2
CHEERS! to competition!


RE: Awww...
By PlasmaBomb on 9/15/2008 6:18:30 PM , Rating: 2
Sarcasm seems to be lost on the interwebs :(


Ya sure bud
By Finnkc on 9/15/2008 1:37:27 PM , Rating: 4
quote:

1. Edited wikipedia in their favour.
2. Had amazon pull bad reviews of spore.
3. Destroys quality in games they buy from other studios games like simcity/c&c/spore/argueably battlefield, it needs a 1gb patch to be decent.
4. Their support for games is extremely poor compared with blizzard and valve.
5. EA has no talent to develop fun games that appeal to people over 5 years old so they buy people with talent and alienate them
6. Their sports franchises are merely copy/pastes of last years sports game


wow ...

1. Welcome to wikipedia ... it’s the internet get over it.

2. Amazon makes the call not EA get your facts in line. You think a bunch of EA goons just showed up and told them to pull comments? Amazon is a business and don’t want to be the ground zero of another childish retaliation protest. Bahhh Bahhh … sounds like sheep following the leader.

3. Yea DICE, BioWare, BlackBox, Mythic, and Criterion, all make junk games, how could I have been so stupid. Sorry but the EA you loved to hate 4 years ago is gone. And PC games that "need 1gb patches" to as you say "be good" are about 1/10th of the market and have been like this since patches could be downloaded. Show me a PC game made in the last 10 years that sold 1 Mill + that hasn’t had a patch?

4. Blizzard has one current game, (WoW) that makes more money a month then a small country, of course they are going to have top notch support. Valve makes one game every 2-5 years … EA makes 1-5 games a month. Do that math kid.

5. Is that a fact? So a company hires people with talent to make them a product? ... thanks, your insight is amazing, I am sure EA is taking notes. So explain to me again how they Alienate them after the fact?

6. What do you expect them to change? The rules of Hockey don't change from year to year. The teams don't change that much from year to year. The engine technology doesn't change over night nor does the hardware tech. So again what do you expect them to change? Maybe they should make NHL Adventure Island edition for morons like you.

All noise no substance … get use to a life of being unsubstantial.




RE: Ya sure bud
By TreeDude62 on 9/15/2008 2:09:25 PM , Rating: 1
1-5 games a month is a little bit of an exaggeration. But I see some of your point. However if EA cannot properly support the games they release, then they need to cut down the quantity and focus on quality.

Just because they release more games does justify the piss poor support they give. Not to mention all the DRM nonsense that is going on.

Also monopolizing the NFL rights is a shitty thing for any company to do. I don't play NFL games, but that is just wrong.


RE: Ya sure bud
By TreeDude62 on 9/15/2008 2:13:07 PM , Rating: 2
does *not* justify

Why do I always do that...


RE: Ya sure bud
By joemoedee on 9/15/2008 2:40:53 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Also monopolizing the NFL rights is a shitty thing for any company to do. I don't play NFL games, but that is just wrong.


Blame the NFL, not EA. They tendered the exclusive license, and EA won the bid. I was, and still am, a NFL2K guy. But, one must place blame appropriately.

TakeTwo has the exclusive MLB rights. (Although the rights do allow for first party games)

Yet, you never really read how lousy it is. (And that goes with EA's MVP series being arguably the best baseball franchise available at the time)

It's just trendy to hate the big boys. EA, MS, etc...

They make mistakes. They're not the greatest. But, they have put out many enjoyable games throughout the years and will continue to do so.


RE: Ya sure bud
By BigPeen on 9/15/2008 3:12:03 PM , Rating: 2
exactly, putting out a lot of games is no excuse for not supporting them. If you can put out a lot of games, than you should be able to support them. EA is gonna get whats coming to them. You can only put out buggy, underdeveloped, half baked, copy-cat games and charge premium prices for so long.


RE: Ya sure bud
By Maximilian on 9/15/08, Rating: 0
RE: Ya sure bud
By MarchTheMonth on 9/15/2008 3:40:23 PM , Rating: 2
#1 and #2 I agree with you on.

quote:
3. Yea DICE, BioWare, BlackBox, Mythic, and Criterion, all make junk games, how could I have been so stupid. Sorry but the EA you loved to hate 4 years ago is gone. And PC games that "need 1gb patches" to as you say "be good" are about 1/10th of the market and have been like this since patches could be downloaded. Show me a PC game made in the last 10 years that sold 1 Mill + that hasn’t had a patch?

Bioware is a recent acquisition, you cannot put that to the favor of EA (or disfavor) yet, until BioShock or something else with it's development time mostly under EA ownership. And the point he's trying to make is studios like Westwood, who had great games, and under EA ownership, because so-so sequels, or worse. The only game that comes to mind as a completely EA game that has completely succeeded on every front is The Sims (1 and 2), and to be fair, EA doesn't even get a lot of credit, as the The Sims creator (and now Spore creator) is given all the credit, not EA really.

quote:
4. Blizzard has one current game, (WoW) that makes more money a month then a small country, of course they are going to have top notch support. Valve makes one game every 2-5 years … EA makes 1-5 games a month. Do that math kid.


How is your memory? Starcraft is a gold mine in Korea. Warcraft 3 is still an incredibly popular game (partially in thanks to DOTA), and there's still enough interest in Diablo that they're making Diablo 3. "Current game" is relative, since yes, WoW is they're only game that they are actively developing post-release, but lest you forget that Starcraft 2 is right around the corner, Diablo 3 probably the year following, and they still have an unknown "next-gen mmo" in the works that they've said nothing about other than the project exists, in addition to their other 3 games that are still extremely strong games, especially considering their age.

#5 is really just flame bair (not your responce, the original #5)

quote:
6. What do you expect them to change? The rules of Hockey don't change from year to year. The teams don't change that much from year to year. The engine technology doesn't change over night nor does the hardware tech. So again what do you expect them to change? Maybe they should make NHL Adventure Island edition for morons like you.


What he was likely looking for is something like what ESPN football or 2k football was giving as far as new features, a different feel, and such. And instead of embracing other's (arguably better) design, they bought an exclusive contract with the NFL that basically has given gamers no choice in how they enjoy their game, only the roster really changes. The point the OP was probably trying to make is why the hell is someone paying $50-60 just for a roster update and a little extra flash, $50-60 on any other game would usually entail SIGNIFICANT changes. But no, with an exclusive contract, we instead have very little difference between the yearly update.


lame
By Finnkc on 9/15/2008 11:02:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
What a relief! The last thing we need is another developer assimilated into the EA collective. They gobble up all these developers and franchises, take away their creative control and grind them up into a mash of crap.


Get a clue.

wow ... being someone who works in the Games industry it is very apparent you don't know anything about EA. This is the reason people have all these stupid notions about what a company like EA is about. People with very little knowledge hiding behind their PC and posting stuff they know very little about.

EA takes very good care of it's studios and the people that work in them, so your witty Star Trek comment is just plain false. If you worked at an EA owned studio you would know this but, Burger King will have to do for you I guess. John R. has done great work for the company in the last 12 months, and yes EA has had some bad PR with some of it's franchises. Everyone knows this, thanks for the update from 2001 bud, no one cares. Are they perfect? Nope, not even close. Are they the evil empire everyone like you believes them to be? Nope, not even close.

EA doesn't care what you think, because what you think is uninformed and nonconstructive, so why should they care?




RE: lame
By joemoedee on 9/15/2008 11:53:21 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
wow ... being someone who works in the Games industry it is very apparent you don't know anything about EA. This is the reason people have all these stupid notions about what a company like EA is about. People with very little knowledge hiding behind their PC and posting stuff they know very little about.


I agree, even though I don't work in the games industry.

Gaming is way different than it was 10 years ago. Biggest difference... Budget.

Games nowadays have budgets equal to or more than Hollywood movie budgets. Smaller developers (Not ALL of them) have a much more difficult time than the large developers. So, if EA buys a small studio, bankrolls the project... we see good games come out from companies that wouldn't have been able to come to market without such backing.

Now I also agree EA has been known to phone it in (IE Madden on 6th gen systems since 06) but also they have put many great games in our hands that we may have otherwise not been given the chance to play.


RE: lame
By Maximilian on 9/15/2008 1:01:34 PM , Rating: 1
People who support EA are idiots, theres no dancing around the fact that EA sucks. Heres a list of why:

1. Edited wikipedia in their favour.
2. Had amazon pull bad reviews of spore.
3. Destroys quality in games they buy from other studios games like simcity/c&c/spore/argueably battlefield, it needs a 1gb patch to be decent.
4. Their support for games is extremely poor compared with blizzard and valve.
5. EA has no talent to develop fun games that appeal to people over 5 years old so they buy people with talent and alienate them
6. Their sports franchises are merely copy/pastes of last years sports game

Its great that they never got their dirty hands on taketwo. For the record some corporations DO care about the consumer and their opinion, if you think otherwise you are a tool and fail to realise corporations are slaves to US, the consumer and would be nothing without us.


RE: lame
By TreeDude62 on 9/15/2008 1:21:27 PM , Rating: 2
I could care less how they treat the companies they buy. I care how they treat their customers.

As a long time Battlefield player I can tell you they drop support for games as soon as they start on the next one. Battlefield Vietnam and Battlefield 2 both still have major bugs and they will never be fixed. Which is one of the reasons I never picked up 2142, I am not giving them any more of my money.

Valve on the other hand still does updates for their older games to this date. That is why I would much rather buy a Valve made game than EA.

Look at all the updates TF2 is still getting almost a year later. EA would never, EVER do anything like that.


RE: lame
By akugami on 9/15/2008 1:44:30 PM , Rating: 1
The only thing the public (and not the Madden crowd) cares about is the quality of the games. We have seen too many studios swallowed up by EA and then churn out sh*t. When it happens to one studio it may be a fluke but when it's going past three, it's a trend.

And just because a game is a million seller doesn't mean it's a quality game. Madden is a bad example due to the popularity of the NFL and Madden being an exclusive license. I, and others, have seen the innovative or at least games that were in the top five of their respective genre released from small studios. After EA acquired them we saw drivel.

Even when we get a game that is innovative or top ranking, EA has to screw over paying customers with DRM or they rush out the game at such an early stage hoping to just patch up any bugs.

Look at any game studio after it's second year of being assimilated by EA. This would roughly be the time period when any new game ideas were developed after being acquired by EA. A rehash takes about a year roughly to produce while original games (and hopefully quality games) usually take two to three years in the incubator. There are very few good games out of all these studios after it's acquisition by EA compared to before the acquisition. It's own CEO, John Riccitiello, admitted in an interview that their track record of nurturing studios they have acquired sucks.

As for EA workers being treated well...they are taken care of so well that they had to file suit for unpaid OT wages. And that's probably just the tip of the iceburg since where there's smoke there's fire.


GTA IV
By EntreHoras on 9/15/2008 8:57:55 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
Slower than expected sales of Grand Theft Auto 4

Who knew?
The last news I heard about sales of GTA IV were the opposite.




RE: GTA IV
By Sazar on 9/15/2008 7:21:44 PM , Rating: 2
I thought the same. I thought it was a record-breaking game. I expect big sales when the game is released on PC as well.


Whew!
By an0dize on 9/15/2008 8:38:40 AM , Rating: 2
What a relief! The last thing we need is another developer assimilated into the EA collective. They gobble up all these developers and franchises, take away their creative control and grind them up into a mash of crap.




RE: Whew!
By spuddyt on 9/15/2008 10:27:27 AM , Rating: 2
and then put securom with it


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini











botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki