Doomsday for Samsung in U.S., Jury Rules it Slavishly Infringed Apple's Patents
Brandon Hill & Jason Mick
August 24, 2012 5:56 PM
Samsung is ordered to pay $1.05B USD in damages; virtually all of Samsung's products likely to be banned in the U.S.
In a shockingly short amount of time, it was revealed this afternoon that the jury has reached a verdict in the Apple vs. Samsung case  in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
. Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Kwon Oh-hyun
given one last chance earlier this week to reach a settlement
before the matter was put into the hands of the jury, but those efforts failed.
Deliberations for the case began on Wednesday, and given how impressively complex the case has been with regards to design patent infringement claims and counter claims, this is quite surprising that the jury was able to reach a verdict in such a relatively short amount of time. The jury reported that it reached its verdict at 2:35 p.m. PST on Friday.
Apple, Inc. (
) is asking $2.5 billion in damages from Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and over 700 issued had to be resolved by the jury in this tangled web spun in the countroom for the past month by lawyers from both sides.
Samsung and Apple are the
phonemakers in America, with Apple posting several times the profit of Samsung, and Samsung outselling Apple
in present quarterly unit sales.
Apple in April 2011 sued Samsung
for "slavishly copying"
its smartphones and tablets.
with a countersuit later that month, and the conflict quickly escalated to courts worldwide.
Apple iPhone 4S
A Netherlands ruling
found Apple innocent and Samsung guilty, but only led to a brief ban on a handful of Apple products; a
ruling in South Korea
this week found both companies guilty and again only led to a handful of product bans. A German ruling instituted the stiffest ban -- a complete sales prohibition on Samsung's
. However, Samsung has been able to
circumvent that design-based ruling
via redesigning its tablet's shell.
Steve Jobs who masterminded the lawsuit against Samsung,
calling for "thermonuclear" war
with Samsung and its fellow Android phonemakers,
resigned exactly one year ago today
died shortly thereafter
II. The Verdict
Samsung has been found guilt of violating the '301 ("bounce patent"; all devices),
U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915
("pinch to zoom"; almost all devices),
U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381
(all devices), and '163 ("double tap to zoom"; some devices, but not others) technology patents for most of its smartphone and tablet devices.
The '915 patent covers pinch to zoom. Pinch to zoom was first dreamt up decades ago by Myron Krueger and the University of Toronto developed and published papers on virtually equivalent technology
almost 25 years prior
to Apple producing its
first multi-touch device
(the iPhone), but Apple claims to have "invented" pinch-to-zoom as it appeared to be the first to do it in the context of a capacitive multi-touch screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S II was one of many Samsung products found to have infringed on Apple patents.
The '301 patent is the so-called "bounce" or "rubber-band" patent, that covers a
-- essentially an animation that mimics naturally occurring phenomena, such as a spring. Apple has been granted exclusive rights by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
to animate this class of phenomena, oft observed visually in nature.
More surprisingly the jury found Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's
U.S. Design Patent No. D618,677
, which Apple's attorney's argued in testimony give it exclusive rights to produce rectangular smartphones with rounded edges.
The jury found that the Galaxy S (and its various branded names) infringed on both Apple patents, but Samsung's new Galaxy S II smartphone (and its various branded names) only violated the '677 patent.
Samsung did get a small reprieve, being found innocent of similar claims regarding Apple's iPad design patent --
U.S. Design Patent D504,889
. None of Samsung's tablets were found to infringe on the '889 patent.
Nearly all the infringement was dubbed willful and that Samsung should have known, which is very bad news for Samsung.
"It's a celebration!" The jury awarded Apple $1.05B in damages.
The jury also ruled that Samsung had not successfully argued any of Apple's patents -- including the design ones -- were invalid.
Samsung, according to the jury, "diluted" Apple's trade dress with the sweeping infringements they found it guilty of.
The jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1,051,855,000 USD ($1.05B USD).
The jury found Apple innocent of infringing on Samsung's
U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711
, '893, '460, and '516 patents. Samsung was found innocent of antitrust violations for litigating with its 3G and 4G standards patents, but it was barred from future litigation ("patent exhaustion")
: This is not as bad as it could have been, especially considering that Samsung was found guilty on most counts and that Apple wanted $2.5B USD. Worldwide, Samsung
makes close to $4B USD
in profit per quarter off its smartphones --so this is between a third to a quarter of Samsung's quartery profit. Severe, certainly, but not enough to remove Samsung from the market.)
III. What's Next
The damages aren't really the worst part of this for Samsung.
The very bad part is that it will now find virtually all of its smartphones banned from sale in the U.S., pending software and design modifications. This could literally cost it several times the damages in lost sales.
Judge Lucy Koh
has yet to deliver a final ruling, which will likely include product bans, but that should come in a matter of days. One thing's for sure -- Samsung is going to appeal this, but it's likely to lose billions in the meantime.
The Galaxy S III
merely because it was too fresh to be banned, but Apple could use the jury's sweeping ruling as leverage to push for a speedy ban on that device to by the
U.S. International Trade Commission
Apple has done it -- it's quite literally dealt a death blow to the biggest Android phonemaker's U.S. sales.
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
South Korean Court: Both Apple and Samsung are Guilty
August 24, 2012, 3:14 PM
Samsung CEO to Call Apple's Cook for One Last Settlement Chance
August 20, 2012, 4:11 PM
Android, iOS Continue Smartphone Assault During Q2
August 8, 2012, 9:00 AM
Samsung Accused of Destroying Evidence, EU Bans Galaxy Tab 7.7
July 26, 2012, 3:17 PM
Apple iPhones Outsold by Samsung 2-to-1 in Q2, Profit Suffers
July 24, 2012, 5:30 PM
Are You in the Market for Earphones?
March 24, 2017, 7:35 AM
Samsung Galaxy S8, Rumored Launch Date!
March 18, 2017, 6:45 AM
How about Leica Cameras
March 13, 2017, 6:30 AM
Nokia has ditched this camera technology in its new smartphones
March 7, 2017, 8:45 AM
A Baseball Cap With Camera
March 3, 2017, 7:00 AM
Nokia 3310 with longer battery life
February 28, 2017, 7:05 AM
Most Popular Articles
Intel Optane SSd DC P4800X – Super Fast 3D Storage
March 20, 2017, 7:35 AM
Comparison – Samsung Galaxy TabPro S Vs Microsoft Surface Pro 4
March 21, 2017, 7:40 AM
Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming G1 – Intel Thunderbolt 3 Certified Motherboard
March 9, 2017, 6:25 AM
Samsung Galaxy S8, Rumored Launch Date!
March 18, 2017, 6:45 AM
Huawei P8 Lite 2017 – Android 7 Nougat Smartphone with Octa-Core Processor
March 8, 2017, 7:03 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Are you thinking of performance and speed? Intel claims:
Mar 25, 2017, 7:45 AM
Apple buys an automation app called Workflow. The deal was completed today and brings the app along with its developers.
Mar 23, 2017, 7:35 AM
Apple Announces new color for iPhones and iPads
Mar 22, 2017, 7:45 AM
Instagram: You Can Now Save Live Videos For Later
Mar 21, 2017, 7:49 AM
Samsung Galaxy S8 to Get New Color Scheme
Mar 20, 2017, 7:45 AM
What else to worry about?
Mar 17, 2017, 6:45 AM
Icon of the Day: Intel/ NVIDIA or Mobileye
Mar 16, 2017, 6:15 AM
JUST IN - Twitter Hijacked : High-Profile Account Accesses
Mar 15, 2017, 7:07 AM
Mar 14, 2017, 7:30 AM
News and Tips
Mar 13, 2017, 6:30 AM
iPhone 8 – May Not Get Curved Screen
Mar 11, 2017, 8:00 AM
California paves way to self-driving car tests without humans
Mar 11, 2017, 7:18 AM
Smart Machines V hackers
Mar 10, 2017, 7:00 AM
Uber Can Resume Autonomous Car Testing in California
Mar 9, 2017, 6:50 AM
Mar 8, 2017, 7:09 AM
Mar 7, 2017, 8:45 AM
World news 3-6
Mar 6, 2017, 5:40 AM
Mar 4, 2017, 7:40 AM
Mixed News of the Day
Mar 4, 2017, 6:32 AM
Jaguar Land Rover invests in ride-sharing
Mar 3, 2017, 7:00 AM
Mixed News of The World:
Mar 2, 2017, 7:02 AM
World New 3-1
Mar 1, 2017, 6:30 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2017 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information