Print 75 comment(s) - last by JumpingJack.. on Dec 7 at 2:41 AM

AMD memo leaked to DailyTech shows Phenom availability

AMD and Intel have historically traded the title of the best performing CPUs. Recently, however, the battle has been largely one-sided with Intel taking the volume and performance crown.

AMD hopes to change that with the release of its new Phenom processors. MSI was the first mainboard manufacturer to announce an RD790 mainboard, the K9A2 Platinum, for the quad-core and tri-core Phenom's. Mainboards from ASUS and Gigabyte based on RD790 were announced in October and also support Phenom quad-core processors.

More details of the AMD platform launch that included the Phenom, the RD790 chipset and the RV670 graphics processor surfaced early in November. DailyTech reported early in November 2007 on the pricing structure of the Phenom processors ranging from about $280 to $330 USD. 

An AMD internal memos hows the AMD Phenom 9700, 2.4 GHz processor is slated for mid-December availability. Allocation for the Phenom 9600 running at 2.3GHz has been pushed back to a Q1 2008 date.

The Tech Report, in an interview with AMD's desktop product marketing manager Michael Saucier, confirmed an erratum for all Phenom processors that will cause the system to hang due to an L3 cache miss.  The Tech Report claims this fix will degrade performance as much at 10%.

The mainboard favored by AMD, the MSI K9A2 Platinum is impossible to get currently since it is out of stock. MSI confirmed to DailyTech that this board will start shipping again next week, and that the board itself is not with any defect, but just in high demand and low availability.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: kinda..
By Clauzii on 12/4/2007 9:24:03 PM , Rating: 2
I would include the Pentium also.

A k6 200MHz was also upto 40% slower than the Pentium 200 MHz when doing FPU operations!

RE: kinda..
By Martimus on 12/5/2007 12:47:12 PM , Rating: 2
The way I remember it, the Intel chip was only better at MMX optimized applications, but AMD had better performance on just about anything else clock-for-clock. Of course, P2 came out soon after, and AMD didn't have an answer for it. Heck, Cyrix had some pretty powerful chips at the time, if they were at all reliable then they may have had the best value. Of course they were just known for being nothing but problems.

RE: kinda..
By Clauzii on 12/6/2007 1:11:17 PM , Rating: 2
No - I mean FPU..

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki