AMD Tri-core Processor Details for 2008 and 2009
December 4, 2007 2:56 AM
comment(s) - last by
AMD has something for everyone with its new tri-core processors, but quite a lot is still marked "tentative"
AMD picked up big headlines
the day before Intel's Fall Developer Forum
with the announcement of its upcoming tri-core processors.
AMD's original release did not specify if this tri-core processor, code named
, would be a totally new processor or merely a stripped-down version of
. The answer, it appears, is both.
In an embargoed corporate roadmap forwarded to
, details of these new triple-core oddities came to light.
The first triple-core processor,
, is essentially a core-disabled version of the
quad-core processor. It includes a full
package, including the 2MB of shared L3 cache, with one core disabled.
, which will eventually herald the AMD Phenom 8000-product name, is scheduled to launch in February 2008 with mass availability in March. AMD representatives, speaking on conditions of anonymity, confirmed the initial 2.4 GHz Phenom 8700 and 2.3 GHz Phenom 8600 tri-core processors will launch with a 95W thermal envelope.
In late 2008, AMD will shift almost all of its 65nm quad-core offerings to 45nm. AMD will then follow up these initial quad-core offerings with 45nm dual-core and triple-core processors in 2009.
The first of these 45nm tri-core processors, codenamed
, will launch with DDR2 and DDR3 support. However, AMD guidance also details that
will ship with two different varieties: one with a shared L3 cache, another without. All 45nm quad-core AMD processors incorporate shared L3 cache, with
the exception of the
AMD guidance goes on to state that all mainstream Phenom quad-core processors, both with shared L3 cache (
) and without (
), shipped in 2009 will feature DDR3 exclusively.
, on the other hand, will feature a mix of DDR2 and DDR3 support.
Unfortunately the answers for tri-core only raise further questions. While
has a unique codename, it seems to be a combination of cut-down
quad-core processors. The logical conclusion would be that
is merely excess or defective
processors from the 2008 launch.
Yet AMD's roadmap goes on to detail one more chip:
which has always been described by AMD as a dual-core version of
, will make its debut with variable shared L3 cache and a mix of DDR2 and DDR3 support. Could it be that
is a core-disabled version of
, which is already likely a core-disabled version of
One AMD representative declined to comment on these 45nm processors, stating that 2009 processor launches and specifications are still "tentitive."
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
This is ridiculous
12/4/2007 10:08:40 AM
Talk about a confusing roadmap.
4-Core's supporting DDR3/DDR2
4-Core's only supporting DDR3
4-Core's with Zero L3 Cache supporting only DDR3
3-Core's with all the above
2-Core's with all the above
Where is the market demand for all these options?
Mostly no L3 cache? These processors already perform weakly, and you are taking the L3 away? They must believe that the L3 is why the things are not scaling well. Remember K6-3 ? Here we are again.
AMD Tri-Core == Joke!
A 2.4GHz Quad barely competes against its own Athlon 6400+ Dual. How can disabling one of the cores make this even a viable choice? Can anyone say E6850 at 3GHz would wipe the floor with it? Not to mention all the 45nm Penryn Duals coming soon.
AMD fanboys: No one is saying that it isn't a good idea for AMD to try and sell those quad-cores with one defective core. The point is, AMD made this huge announcement about how it is some kind of great technological innovation. One that their competitors have no answer for.
It would be like GM selling you a Corvette with only 7 pistons firing in their V8 engines and calling it "the next great innovation from GM, the V7 engine".
RE: This is ridiculous
12/4/2007 11:24:13 AM
lol. Though I might disagree that the Barc performs as well as a K8, which it does not, I do agree the market for a tri-core will be limited to none.
AMD have seem to take a production centric approach rather than a customer centric approach to marketing. Something most have not seen since the Industrial revolution.
I guess there is more than one way to lose money.
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA
AMD "Spider" Crawls Up the Water Spout
November 18, 2007, 3:16 AM
AMD Adds Triple-Core Processors to Roadmap
September 17, 2007, 2:45 PM
AMD Reveals Phenom Model Numbers
July 28, 2007, 12:19 AM
AMD Second-Generation "Stars" Plans Unveiled
July 2, 2007, 2:07 PM
3/7/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 7, 2014, 10:19 AM
Quick Note: OCZ Z-Drive 4500 PCIe SSD Gets Official
March 4, 2014, 9:53 AM
3/4/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 4, 2014, 8:45 AM
2/27/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 27, 2014, 11:54 AM
2/26/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 26, 2014, 10:28 AM
AVADirect Unleashes High-End Supermicro, Tyan GPU Servers
February 7, 2014, 12:35 PM
Most Popular Articles
Mt. Gox Bitcoin CEO Can't Stifle Grin as he Bows in Apology for Bankruptcy
February 28, 2014, 5:00 PM
Facebook Kills Popular Messenger App for PCs
March 1, 2014, 4:01 PM
Report: Microsoft Considering Offering Free “Windows 8.1 with Bing”
February 28, 2014, 10:21 AM
Two More Microsoft Executives Leaving the Company
March 3, 2014, 4:38 PM
USAF Moves Forward With Long Range Bomber Program Despite Budget Crunch
March 4, 2014, 9:44 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information