AMD Tri-core Processor Details for 2008 and 2009
December 4, 2007 2:56 AM
comment(s) - last by
AMD has something for everyone with its new tri-core processors, but quite a lot is still marked "tentative"
AMD picked up big headlines
the day before Intel's Fall Developer Forum
with the announcement of its upcoming tri-core processors.
AMD's original release did not specify if this tri-core processor, code named
, would be a totally new processor or merely a stripped-down version of
. The answer, it appears, is both.
In an embargoed corporate roadmap forwarded to
, details of these new triple-core oddities came to light.
The first triple-core processor,
, is essentially a core-disabled version of the
quad-core processor. It includes a full
package, including the 2MB of shared L3 cache, with one core disabled.
, which will eventually herald the AMD Phenom 8000-product name, is scheduled to launch in February 2008 with mass availability in March. AMD representatives, speaking on conditions of anonymity, confirmed the initial 2.4 GHz Phenom 8700 and 2.3 GHz Phenom 8600 tri-core processors will launch with a 95W thermal envelope.
In late 2008, AMD will shift almost all of its 65nm quad-core offerings to 45nm. AMD will then follow up these initial quad-core offerings with 45nm dual-core and triple-core processors in 2009.
The first of these 45nm tri-core processors, codenamed
, will launch with DDR2 and DDR3 support. However, AMD guidance also details that
will ship with two different varieties: one with a shared L3 cache, another without. All 45nm quad-core AMD processors incorporate shared L3 cache, with
the exception of the
AMD guidance goes on to state that all mainstream Phenom quad-core processors, both with shared L3 cache (
) and without (
), shipped in 2009 will feature DDR3 exclusively.
, on the other hand, will feature a mix of DDR2 and DDR3 support.
Unfortunately the answers for tri-core only raise further questions. While
has a unique codename, it seems to be a combination of cut-down
quad-core processors. The logical conclusion would be that
is merely excess or defective
processors from the 2008 launch.
Yet AMD's roadmap goes on to detail one more chip:
which has always been described by AMD as a dual-core version of
, will make its debut with variable shared L3 cache and a mix of DDR2 and DDR3 support. Could it be that
is a core-disabled version of
, which is already likely a core-disabled version of
One AMD representative declined to comment on these 45nm processors, stating that 2009 processor launches and specifications are still "tentitive."
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Three cores?
12/4/2007 8:56:46 AM
That is not a correct assessment of how things work when it comes to additional cores. A big factor is how the cores talk to each other, and how well the cache is used between the cores. In the case of cores and multi-threaded applications, the more cores you have will allow for a better distribution of program threads between the cores.
When it comes to memory or other components, there are technical reasons why you see increases that follow the binary increments, but in this case, you just have an extra core that the OS can assign threads to.
The real problem that AMD needs to address is getting clock speeds up, since single-threaded applications will still run on only one core, and a 2.4GHz Phenom quad-core will probably run a single-threaded application slower than a 2.8GHz Athlon 64 X2(depending on what other applications are running at the same time).
RE: Three cores?
12/4/2007 9:11:17 AM
Can we expect similar real world performance from a tri-core?
Unless your running multiple programs at once, the computer would not be able to take advantage of all 4 cores, with the same L3 Cache as a 4 core, and most programs designed to run on two cores (if that), couldn't a chip like this run with little to no noticeable difference?
Especially in current gen games, there most likely would be no difference in a similarly clocked tri/quad core chip. We'll see when they get some reviews done.
All the benefit of the technology, larger cache, lower price. I would buy it! Hell if you guys don't want it, that will only drive the price down more. Cheaper for me!
In the meantime, AMD has now become the largest manufacturer of paper and ink....
"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch
AMD "Spider" Crawls Up the Water Spout
November 18, 2007, 3:16 AM
AMD Adds Triple-Core Processors to Roadmap
September 17, 2007, 2:45 PM
AMD Reveals Phenom Model Numbers
July 28, 2007, 12:19 AM
AMD Second-Generation "Stars" Plans Unveiled
July 2, 2007, 2:07 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information