backtop


Print 39 comment(s) - last by wallijonn.. on Dec 4 at 10:34 AM

Social networking giant Facebook deals with frustrated users who feel it violated their privacy

Many of Facebook's traditionally carefree users are not so happy these days.  The reason for much of their anger was due to Facebook's launch of new tracking software early last month, which loaded users up with an adware platform dubbed Beacon. 

The program tracked information on customer purchases outside of the site and at participating online retailers -- even if the user was logged off of his or her Facebook account.  The software was used to direct ads to the user when he or she was logged into Facebook, which while a bit invasive for some people's taste, seemed innocuous enough. 

Then came the reports that the Beacon platform was doing a bit more than it should have.  The software would post stories about user purchases in the users' news feeds.  Hopefully those CDs and movies you bought weren't a birthday gift (or hopefully your friend doesn't use Facebook) as it might have just been posted for all to see!  This was a typical sort of frustration that faced users, who felt betrayed by Facebook that the company was exposing their private information and purchase in an intrusive manner.

The move even began to generate political pressure, as many people wrote to their political leaders that Facebook was violating their consumer rights.

Facing mounting pressure, Facebook has now backed down halfway.  Now it is changing the service so that news feed still appear, but require a user to click "OK" before they will be posted to feed that the public can see.

Facebook reaffirmed its support of the Beacon platform as a whole, though, saying it felt that the software was respectful of user privacy.

Facebook is developing a bit of a big brother image with moves like this and a major recent investment from Microsoft.  Whether this effects its wild growth has yet to be seen.  Facebook also has faced negative press lately when it was subpoenaed by the New York state Attorney General over solicitation of minors on the site.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You can't have your cake and eat it....
By kilkennycat on 12/3/2007 11:00:31 AM , Rating: 5
Want to social-network and still enjoy privacy?. Then don't expose any personal information on social-networking sites. Especially any owned by Big Business. Get with your (real-life) friends and enjoy yourselves... just like you used to do.




By FITCamaro on 12/3/2007 12:20:44 PM , Rating: 4
What if I already ate my cake? Can I steal someone else's and then I'll have it and not eat it? Or I'll just make another cake and say its the original one so they'll think I didn't eat it.


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By drakanious on 12/3/2007 12:28:22 PM , Rating: 4
There is no cake!


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By Polynikes on 12/3/2007 12:50:56 PM , Rating: 5
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By Gnoad on 12/3/2007 1:01:47 PM , Rating: 2
Normally I just sigh and shake my head whenever a new catch phrase appears, but Portal was just such a good game that I fully approve this one and hope it doesn't get replaced anytime soon.


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By kilkennycat on 12/3/07, Rating: -1
By bodar on 12/3/2007 1:48:35 PM , Rating: 5
Guess it's a good thing he was referring to "The cake is a lie" then.


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By ajira99 on 12/3/2007 12:30:42 PM , Rating: 2
The cake is a lie!!! Oh, and I agree with the original poster.


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By JonnyDough on 12/3/07, Rating: 0
By spluurfg on 12/4/2007 12:02:50 AM , Rating: 3
Really? I would have figured stupid rich people would be the easiest targets.

Also from what I understand, it's one thing to profile people, but another entirely to surreptitiously mine information using adware that installs itself without informing you.

E.g. Google checkout profiles what stuff I buy and gives me some ads. Well, I guess I understood that they were going to know what stuff I purchased since I use them to process payments. Apple iPhone mining your credit card details and purchasing habits and sending it back to Mr. Jobs? Not as well understood, since I thought I was just using the internet on my phone...


RE: You can't have your cake and eat it....
By TomZ on 12/3/2007 12:56:45 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Want to social-network and still enjoy privacy?

Huh, how are the two related at all? You're getting caught up in the words and surface definitions.

If I decide to join a social network, that doesn't mean that I expect them to plunder my browsing history, purchase history, or anything else. If I join a social network, that only means that I want to share things like my made-up name and maybe some other selective facts about myself. It's not a carte blanche for the social network provider.


By darkfoon on 12/4/2007 3:06:55 AM , Rating: 2
I agree.
The information I provide to a social network is information that I am comfortable sharing with absolute strangers.
However, I am not alright with them installing software that seeks out information that I am NOT EXPLICITLY sharing with them. My browsing history is not something that I am posting in my Facebook notes, so I don't think they should have access to it.

I joined facebook because I enjoyed its clean interface over myspace's clutter and garish profiles. However, I am finding that facebook's recent conduct is giving me doubts...


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki