Print 92 comment(s) - last by DeepBlue1975.. on Nov 20 at 4:03 PM

Apple pokes fun at Microsoft's Vista woes in its latest advertisements... again
Microsoft rolls along with SP1 updates

While Apple is using its latest round of TV commercials to further push the butcher knife into Windows Vista -- specifically, Microsoft's decision to extend the sales of Windows XP and allow users to downgrade Vista to Windows XP -- the boys in Redmond are hard at work on the first service pack for the operating system.

Microsoft released the Service Pack 1 (SP1) beta to a select group of testers in late September. The update cured many of the ailments that afflicted Windows Vista since its retail release on January 30.

"Improvements were also noticeable in resuming from Hibernation or Sleep on both my desktop PC and laptop running SP1," remarked Microsoft's Brandon LeBlanc in September. "I discovered copying files from one directory to another is a bit faster. And on my laptop - battery life seems to be improved since running SP1. I have also noticed that transferring files to my shares on my Windows Home Server are a bit faster than they were previously without SP1. Overall performance in accessing my mapped network shares is improved as well."

Yesterday, Microsoft released a new Release Candidate (RC) build (6001-17042-071107-1618) of SP1 to testers. The latest build weighs in at 434.84MB for the x86 version and 734.3MB for the x64 version.

Testers who already have the previous SP1 beta installed, however, will run into somewhat of a roadblock when it comes to the new RC build.

"Windows Vista SP1 does not support build-to-build upgrades," states Microsoft. "Therefore, if you have installed a previously release build on your machine, you have to uninstall this old build before installing the next build of Windows Vista SP1."

Windows Vista SP1 RC is currently available for download from the Microsoft Connect website for current SP1 testers.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By mankopi on 11/15/2007 9:27:10 PM , Rating: 3
I dont know why people rant about how horrible Vista is. I recently upgraded to Vista ultimate 64bit and I love every part of It. To me it is WAY better than XP. There are times I think all these people who complain about Vista may not have even tried it.

By SavagePotato on 11/15/2007 9:55:30 PM , Rating: 2
Thats because most of them havent. It's a case of drinking the kool aid and believing the fud, then adding some more fud to it.

Ever do one of those pass the information experiments in gradeschool? They used to do those all the time for fun in my days. You know where you form a circle and one person whispers a simple phrase in the next persons ear, then you wait till it gets to the other end of the circle and see how out to lunch it became.

That in a nutshell describes most anti Vista ranting. Something gets exagerated and twisted a hundred times over and pretty soon people are beleiving their own lies.

By ChronoReverse on 11/15/2007 10:23:35 PM , Rating: 2
At this point here (a year later) the support for Vista 64 is significantly better. I've moved to a dual-boot setup with Vista 64 recently and haven't found a reason I needed to go to a 32bit system so far. And even if I did, there's a good chance I could just use VPC2007.

By SavagePotato on 11/15/2007 10:33:30 PM , Rating: 2
I used Vista 64 at launch and drivers were poor, that should be qualified to Nvidia drivers were poor. Overall the performance of Vista 64 at launch had quite a few unacceptable hitches that 32 bit did not have.

Having switched back to 64 to support 4 gigs of ram, and used it for the last 6 months, I can honestly say from experience that 64 performs 100% as well as 32 bit for me at this point. The only problem left at this point is application compatibility. For me a non issue with any applications I've used.

By gochichi on 11/19/2007 9:45:58 PM , Rating: 2
I own Vista Ultimate 64-bit ... I installed it on a brand new 500GB hard drive leaving my Windows XP installation intact. I've only booted up Win XP a handful of times, and generally strongly prefer Windows Vista.

That having been said. I tried Vista. I also tried a MacBook Pro... and Macs truly are better than PCs. I purchased and returned two Vista laptops before purchasing the MacBook Pro.

Based on the fact that Mac OS X has WAY more "eye candy"... it's really not candy... it's very useful stuff, especially on a portable, and it doesn't tax the system. I'll tell you right now, Vista is junk, and it's not the amount of eye candy. The level of eye candy is so slim on Vista.

I run Ubuntu on my old PC, and it too has more eye candy... and I just can't believe how much peppier it is to Vista on my new PC. An older 512MB Athlon XP appears faster as far as the interface than my new dual-core 2GB machine... that's screwed up. Quit assuming that Vista nay-saying is based on ignorance. It's generally not. 100% Mac users would never comment on Vista, as a matter of fact they'd never be on a website like this.

"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki