backtop


Print 16 comment(s) - last by murphyslabrat.. on Nov 7 at 4:47 PM

Intel's Classmate and the OLPC XO notebook fight it out in the market place despite partnership

When the One Laptop per Child Foundation first proposed the $100 laptop aimed at developing nations, it wasn’t long before Intel came along with its own super low cost laptop aimed at the same demographic called the Classmate PC.

For a while, the OLPC XO laptop and the Classmate from Intel were bitter rivals. That rivalry ended when the OLPC allowed Intel to sit on its board of directors and Intel invested cash into the project. What seems strange is that while Intel and the OLPC Foundation are now partners to some extent, the XO and Classmate laptops still fight it out in the marketplace.

BBC News reported recently that Uruguay purchased 100,000 XO Laptops and optioned an additional 300,000 XO laptops.  Many wondered if the production delays for the XO laptop would make it possible for the OLPC Foundation to fill the 100,000 XO order for Uruguay.

Yesterday, Reuters reported that Libya had purchased 150,000 of Intel’s Classmate notebooks powered by Microsoft Windows. Just a few weeks ago Libya had agreed to buy one million XO Laptops for the OLPC Foundation meaning in the closing hours of the XO deal Intel managed to steal the show.

Intel declined to comment on the price of the Classmate notebooks purchased by Libya, but did say it had not subsidized the cost of the machines. The Classmate notebook was first said to be priced at $250.

Reuters also reported that Libya has agreed to purchase the Classmate notebook rather than the XO laptop.

It remains to be seen if the new ASUS Eee PC notebook can also compete in this worldwide market for ultra-low cost notebook computers. ASUS promised versions of the Eee PC at $199 retail, even though the first units to hit the market here in the U.S. are priced at a much higher $399.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hmm
By jtemplin on 11/2/2007 9:31:34 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
some children stay in school through age 26 or maybe longer

...
I will be about this age when I get my PhD in neuroscience. If I went to say UPitt, they offer the following financial aid for doctoral students:

quote:
The stipend is $24,000 for the 2007-08 academic year. In addition, tuition costs are remitted, an individual health insurance program is provided and paid by the center, and matriculating students receive a one-time educational allowance of $2,000.


Hmm seems that by BEING a student, I will be supporting myself. For many PhD students, you are getting PAID to learn and earn your degree.

Education is the gold standard in our society now. Sure for some students, being kept "under the wing" for an extended amount of time may delay development of independence in some ways. However, there are plenty of undergrads paying their own way, working at night etc. Your darn right its an example at the extreme. Your subjective distinction as to the beginning of adulthood is rediculous, and should acknowledge the role of education in our society.

It is far more mature in my opinion to be increasing your knowledge and in turn your ability to generate income in the long term, than to be working for short term benefits. Young people who demonstrate a willingness to sacrifice small short term benefits for larger long term goals (read: delayed gratification), have a much better prospect in their life for achievement and success.

Perhaps you should reconsider what it means to be an adult, by contemporary standards, instead of comparing to the middle ages. I haven't borne arms lately, nor any children, but I can tell you that every day that I put into studying abstract things that seemingly have no bearing on my day to day subsistence, will bring me a better and brighter future. In my book, that is responsibility, and a hallmark of adulthood.


RE: Hmm
By murphyslabrat on 11/7/2007 4:47:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Your darn right its an example at the extreme. Your subjective distinction as to the beginning of adulthood is rediculous, and should acknowledge the role of education in our society.

No, I am talking about the kids who work 10-20 hours a week and take 6 or fewer credits. I know several people at my school are doing that. Then you have those who wait till they're 20, or later, to start school. Then you have those kids who want to be lawyers or doctors on the sole merit of pay scale, and leech off of their parents till they get their first job. You have those kids who flop between programs for 8 years, because they dislike every program that they try. And that is just Higher education.

quote:
However, there are plenty of undergrads paying their own way, working at night etc.

No argument there, as that is what my brother and I are doing, along with several friends. My point is not that everyone is a lazy idiot, just most people (because if I said "everyone," then that would include me ^^j)

quote:
I will be about this age when I get my PhD in neuroscience.

The grievance I have is not with people trying to get an advanced degree, but with kids choosing a career because it pays well, then barely scraping by in classes because they didn't crack the textbook.

quote:
Perhaps you should reconsider what it means to be an adult, by contemporary standards, instead of comparing to the middle ages.

My point was not that adulthood comes by joining the militia, but that the level and age of expected responsibility has changed dramatically. That the visible majority of kids remain kids well into their 20's


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki