Print 64 comment(s) - last by johnsonx.. on Nov 5 at 4:04 PM

A view of the new contacts manager.  (Source:
GMail 2.0 is coming soon to your friendly local internet.

Google announced some news at its Analysts Day, which may excite some -- it will be releasing a completely rewritten, optimized and improved version of GMail.  The version's goal is reportedly to raise customer satisfaction to 70 percent. 

Such a high satisfaction rate, particularly for a free email service would be very impressive.  Many internet services, including the internet service itself enjoy woefully low satisfaction and general customer antipathy.

GMail has been driven by aging Java-script which will now be brought up to speed. The new version dubbed "GMail 2.0" has two main goals:  faster service and better contact management.

Initial testers reported the test version felt noticeably faster and more responsive, particularly in contacts management.  They report a new contacts screen, as well as that the chat can now not be hidden (at least in the trial version).

Another improvements is that contact pictures can be transferred directly from Google's Picasa web albums, all server-side, to reduce bandwidth and processing expenses on the user side.

Google recently made headlines when it switched to the superior IMAP protocol, an unexpected move for a free internet service, as reported at DailyTech.  IMAP support should be almost completely rolled out to GMail users by now.

Expect to see GMail 2.0 rolled out sometime this year or early next year.  The update is recognizable by a "newer version" option appearing in the upper right hand links in the mail window.  Be sure to comment if you received this update, as Google has not announced a hard date for the rollout.

Google currently features over 4 GB of storage per account, which makes it one of the most generous providers in terms of storage space.

Google has been breaking ground with many new initiatives, including its Google News, the Google Lunar Challenge and the Unity Project -- a trans-Atlantic cableline.  It did recently get its heart broken by Facebook, when it got rejected for Microsoft.  However, it is unconcerned as it has a deal with and several other networks, and hoards of loyal GMail users, who will soon be enjoying an improved version of their favorite email service.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By drebo on 10/31/2007 10:31:52 AM , Rating: 5
I don't know if you've ever used Gmail before, but the interface is superb. It's more polished and functional than most commercial stand-alone email clients. I would definitely say to try it before you knock it. It's a great service, and the fact that it's free just makes it all the better.

When you subscribe to any free service, you're not required to receive a perfect experience. You get what you pay for. GMail, however, is as near to a perfect email service as you could ask for.

By howtochooseausername on 10/31/2007 10:38:46 AM , Rating: 5
I don't know if you've ever used Gmail before, but the interface is superb.

Gotta agree there. GMail's interface is extremely useful. I love how conversations are automatically threaded. And its easy to find any message quickly.

I would love to use GMail for my work.

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By baseball43v3r on 10/31/2007 1:34:29 PM , Rating: 2
I would love to use GMail for my work.

you can use gmail for work, i'm not sure the specifics but my old high school has an agreement with using gmail where we kept our email address but got the goolge interface and the storage capacity from google. i'm not sure where this is at but look throuight the google corporate part (yes this is a free service if i remember correctly) hope that helps

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By sandytheguy on 10/31/2007 2:29:40 PM , Rating: 5
The service is called "Google Apps" now. It allows you to use gmail with your own domain name.

By johnsonx on 11/5/2007 3:57:09 PM , Rating: 2
I have a customer using GMail (vis Google Apps) for two of his domains. It seems to work fine, and is easy to setup.

Personally I think GMail blows compared to having a real mail server; I don't think I could live with it. But the customer seems happy with it, so who am I to argue?

By Spyvie on 10/31/2007 10:44:09 AM , Rating: 2
I tell ever user who'll listen that Gmail is the best email they can get.

Even if they had to pay a small monthly fee, it would still be the best...

I guess I'm a fanboy... a GTard!

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By Murst on 10/31/2007 12:14:49 PM , Rating: 2
I currently use gmail as my main email, although if I had to start over, I'd probably be using hotmail instead (but its too much of a pain to switch emails). I consider both web uis to be awesome.

The thing that really started to bug me about gmail is their "label" system for emails. The labels are nice by themselves, but I would really prefer to place mail in folders. The big problem with labels I guess is that you can't move mail away from your main inbox. Each time you look at the inbox, you have to see all of your mail.

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By llamaboy on 10/31/2007 12:57:19 PM , Rating: 5
Actually .. you don't always have to see everything.

Gmail supports a feature called 'archive' which simply sets a flag on the email hiding it from the initial Inbox view.

So I have my filers apply labels and flip the archive flag, which effectively turns the labels into folders. For example:

Matches: from:(Netflix *)
Do this: Skip Inbox, Apply label "Netflix"

This applys my "Netflix" label, and archives the email so I only see it when I look at the Netflix label and it never even graces my "inbox".

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By Murst on 10/31/2007 2:50:12 PM , Rating: 4
Man, you guys rock. Archive is exactly what I needed. :)

Inbox is so much cleaner now.

By Vim on 11/1/2007 6:30:48 AM , Rating: 2
Wait what? They finally allowed to properly move emails from Archive to Archive? Instead of just labelling em? Honestly, that was the only thing I found wrong with Gmail, other than that, I love it...

By carl0ski on 10/31/2007 6:06:38 PM , Rating: 2
just be careful that you actually put a label on you email before you archive it.

God forbid you may need to use the powerful search to find it again

By Maskarat on 10/31/2007 1:01:54 PM , Rating: 2
Just archive your mail .. and it will vanish from your inbox! It will go inside your archives.

That way you will keep a clean inbox!

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By lumbergeek on 10/31/2007 1:10:26 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. I use my Hotmail account as my primary e-mail just because I've had it forever (!), the spam filter works EXACTLY as I expect it to, configured they way I have it, and folder organization is excellent. Yes, I have a Gmail account, but it's a secondary. Now if Google had Gmail (or even existed - it did not) when I got my first webmail account, maybe I'd be more of a Gmailman. Oh, and for those who complain about the perpetual Beta status at Google, my Google Earth (love it!) does not have a beta tag anymore.

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By gramboh on 10/31/2007 4:27:51 PM , Rating: 5
Hotmail is so slow compared to Gmail in terms of load time and responsiveness, even with my highspeed work connection (100+mbit WAN). GMail feels almost like a local client. Also Hotmail is so damn ugly especially with those horrible banner ads, I can't stand it. Does it still append all your emails with some blurb at the bottom?

By drunkenmastermind on 10/31/2007 6:40:46 PM , Rating: 3
I totally agree that those ad are awful and the reason I dislike hotmail. Gmail is a clean experience for me. All I remember about hotmail is constant deleting to recover space.

RE: Wait...I thought it was still beta....
By 16nm on 10/31/2007 2:27:21 PM , Rating: 3
... and the fact that it's free just makes it all the better.

I understand your point, but I want to clarify that it is not really free. Everytime you give money to a company that advertises on Google, you are paying for the services that Google offers. Companies budget for these advertising costs and their pricing that YOU pay is affected. You do pay Google, just not directly. If you are not happy with any of these many no-cost-to-user services then you should feel free to demand better. Don't think they are free and accept poor service because of it.

By rdeegvainl on 11/1/2007 3:17:47 AM , Rating: 2
That is like saying I paid what's his face down the road's salary, and bought his new Ipod. That is just being part of the economy. Sure in the vaguest sense we do pay for it. But they aren't getting the money from us so we don't really pay for it.
They might be paying for it with money that was once yours, but, if you parted with it to some company, they have free reign over it, and whatever it goes to pay for, is not paid for by you.
And in the same vague viewpoint that it is, it would be paid for by your employer, since they gave you the money, and if your self employed then it comes from your customers, and eventually it goes all the way back to the government who prints the currency. But really it's all about existing in an economy and Gmail being free.

By Nik00117 on 10/31/2007 4:44:03 PM , Rating: 2
I gotta agree, everyone even complete morons who don't even know what a CPU are have seen my gmail account and they just want it. Everything is just nice and easy to get too.

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki