Let the Good Times Roll: 7 More Years of No Internet Tax
October 26, 2007 1:59 PM
comment(s) - last by
Congress and the House decided once more to not tax the Internet!
The U.S. Congress and Senate once again agreed to a bipartisan resolution that extends the Internet tax moratorium.
The highly debated issue saw strong support for keeping the Internet tax free from both those in the industry and from grass roots movements. ISPs strongly opposed any sort of taxation as it would hurt their revenues by driving away customers. Users, who joined movements such as the "Don't Tax Our Web Coalition," did not want to be taxed either, as taxation would likely mean higher service charges.
A tax moratorium was originally instituted in 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act. It was extended twice already, in 2001 and 2004, but has not been permanently passed into law.
The house and senate disagreed on the exact length to ban taxation. The House passed a resolution calling for a four year ban. The Senate wanted a seven year ban. Both legislative bodies saw strong bipartisan support for some kind of ban, though.
Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) was enthusiastic about the tax moratorium. He elaborated:
"The Internet has provided a powerful economic boost to our nation,and has become an important everyday tool for millions of Americans. By keeping Internet access tax-free and affordable,Congress can encourage Internet use for distance learning,telemedicine, commerce and other important services."
Sadly, the internet is not entirely tax free. The IRS is
pushing a proposal
as part of this year's budget proposal to track user income made on sites such as eBay. They plan to use this information to adjust people's income accordingly.
The proposal for extension of the 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act will now go to a panel composed of House and Senate members which will iron out the differences between the House and Senate's passed proposals and submit a single proposal to the President.
Should the Internet be tax free? The answer according to the public seems to be overwhelming yes. However, your income from private Internet sales soon will be taxable.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/27/2007 12:22:34 AM
The answer is so easy...
Allow editing of any post as long as there are NO VOTES and NO REPLIES on it yet. As soon as somebody votes on or replies to a post, it's set in stone.
I still wonder what would be wrong with that system.
10/29/2007 8:28:19 AM
What's wrong with it? It would require more work to implement! ;)
10/29/2007 11:16:39 AM
You write a post, it's posted and the page isn't refreshing again to show new replies or ratings. You then proceed to edit the post only to find that by the time you have, you have wasted your time because there was a reply or rating in the interim. That could become a frustrating problem that encourages people to misuse the system by making many short posts.
(Usually?) the timing wouldn't be so short but during peak usage hours or with lengthly posts, it would tend to bias the posting system in favor of those writing short one-liners and penalizing those who put forth the effort to write longer posts with significant content and these are the very posts often needing rewording for clarity or to provide sources. That could easily take longer than it takes for someone to hit a reply link and proceed to comment on the original post.
IMO, a fixed time limit regardless of votes or replies would be better, or at least an editing system that locks out replies to a post for that same fixed time limit if the poster making the edit has clicked the edit link.
For example, poster #1 makes a post and has 5 minutes to edit. Let people rate it without that locking out editing as the rating doesn't really matter. Suppose poster #1 waits 2 minutes then decides to edit. If someone had already replied before the edit link was clicked, the page refreshes to show the new content and the post can't be edited. If the edit link was clicked before someone else clicked a reply link, replies are locked out for the remainder of the (5 minutes in this example so 3 minutes remaining) editing period. The key being to lock out the reply for the fixed editing period so long as the edit link is clicked before someone else clicks the reply link.
I feel we should completely do away with the preview window and just do that instead. Then again, does it really matter? If someone spells lose as "loose" we can figure out what was meant, it is more distracting to have someone try to correct or have some spelling Nazi come along and complain than to just keep the conversation moving.
When you talk to someone in real life and they slightly mispronounce something, do you try to force the conversation to come to a stop so you can insist they (re)pronounce a word exactly the way you want them to? No, that would be ridiculous unless you're their grammar school teacher, it would be considered quite rude to do it in real life and here it is the same. If perfection in a posting system is that important, it's a matter of ego, not a matter of unpaid leisure time comments about a news article. I now proceed to post this, having not reread it in the preview. It brings to mind another improvement, that the text box needs to be larger and not a fixed font size. It's annoying to need to move closer to my nice big monitor because of limitations in the primary posting interface. There is over 70% empty white and grey space on the page and the very content being written is tiny? Severe flaw in the UI.
"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
IRS Wants to Tax Online Sales
May 8, 2007, 9:30 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information