backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by gochichi.. on Nov 11 at 9:11 PM


Microsoft credits Vista and Halo 3 for strong fiscal Q1 2008 performance
Microsoft sees its fastest Q1 since 1999

We've heard from three major tech companies regarding third quarter performance over the past two weeks. Intel and Apple were both up, while AMD reported its third straight quarter of losses.

Today, it's Microsoft's turn and its results for fiscal Q1 2008 were quite impressive. The Redmond, Washington-based company recorded operating income of $5.92 billion USD and net income of $4.2 billion USD on revenues of $13.76 billion USD. Microsoft's revenue for Q1 represented a 27 percent increase from fiscal Q1 2007 and marks its best fiscal Q1 performance since 1999.

"This fiscal year is off to an outstanding start with the fastest revenue growth of any first quarter since 1999," said Microsoft CFO Chris Liddell. "Operating income growth of over 30% also reflects our ability to translate revenue into profits while making strategic investments for the future."

Not surprisingly, Microsoft also attributed a good portion of its growth to the success of Windows Vista which launched in late November 2006 for OEMs and late January 2007 for consumers.

"Customer demand for Windows Vista this quarter continued to build with double-digit growth in multi-year agreements by businesses and with the vast majority of consumers purchasing premium editions," said Kevin Johnson, remarked Microsoft Platform and Services Division at Microsoft President Kevin Johnson.

On a division-specific basis, Microsoft's Client, Server and Tools, Business, Online Service and Entertainment and Devices divisions reported Q1 2008 revenue growth of 25 percent, 16 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent and 91 percent respectively compared to fiscal Q1 2007.

The big jump in the Entertainment and Devices division can be attributed to none other than Halo 3. Halo 3 generated $170 million USD within a 24-hour period and raked in over $300 million USD during its opening week.

The release of Halo 3 also allowed Microsoft's Xbox 360 to outsell Nintendo's Wii console for the first time during the month of September. The company managed to move 527,000 Xbox 360s during September compared to 501,000 Wiis. This marks a dramatic improvement from the Xbox 360's August numbers of 276,000 units -- itself a big jump from July's tally of 170,000 units.

Halo 3's release was so profound that Hollywood blamed that lackluster box office debut of The Heartbreak Kid on Master Chief's third adventure.

Halo 3's financial impact was also enough to lift Microsoft's Entertainment and Devices division from a loss of $142 million USD during fiscal Q1 2007 to a $165 million USD profit.

Thanks to Microsoft's strong fiscal Q1 2008 performance, it's raising its outlook for fiscal 2008 performance. Its revenue forecasts are being adjusted from the $57.3 billion USD to $59.2 billion USD range. Operating income forecasts are also being raised to $23.5 billion USD from $22.45 billion USD.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Customer Demand?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 10/26/2007 11:07:26 AM , Rating: 0
quote:
I bought a new laptop 3 weeks ago. Vista of course in installed. It is fine and all but what a resource hog.

How about turning down the settings if you can't handle it? Nothing forces you to use aero.

quote:
Oh and then I found out that if I installed XP on it it would void my warranty and would just plain not work anyway.

No. You would void software support by your PC manufacturer, but the hardware is still under warranty. Nice try though.

quote:
This thing has a C2 Duo T7200 w/2 GB's ram and runs Corel X at the same speed as my 3 year old 3.2 P4 with 1 GB ram.

That Core 2 Duo chip is also running at 2.0 or 2.16 GHz, which is much slower than your old P4. Also note that your old P4 was using hyperthreading so it could execute 2 threads at once if indeed Corel X is multi-threaded. RAM isn't doing to help something like Corel or Photoshop run faster, its raw processor speed. A P4 desktop processor 3.2GHz is faster than a 2.0 or 2.16 GHz processor. I think your placing blame on the OS when you have changed the hardware platform its running on. Your also using a slower 667Mhz system bus when your P4 chip used an 800MHz system bus. If you want to gripe about Vista running an application slower I'm all ears, but don't change the hardware platform it runs on giving us NO Base to test with. Frankly I think your swapping a desktop for a laptop comes with its own performance hits.


RE: Customer Demand?
By GreenyMP on 10/26/2007 11:38:40 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
A P4 desktop processor 3.2GHz is faster than a 2.0 or 2.16 GHz processor.

Completely true if when you say faster you mean faster at pushing operations through the pipeline. But what you infer is that the P4 at 3.2GHz will out-perform the Core 2 Duo at 2GHz. And that is just not true.

You could probably find one benchmark of some random application that shows the P4 3.2 outperforming the Core 2 Duo at 2GHz. But for the most part the Core 2 Duo will have a 20-30% performance advantage.

The rest of your argument is sound. Bus speeds, memory speeds, and graphics processors on laptops will typically eat up a 20-30% performance advantage in a hurry.


RE: Customer Demand?
By afkrotch on 10/28/2007 10:42:52 PM , Rating: 2
I think you missed part of his post or something, if you think it's sound.

His stupid arguement about the P4's hyperthreading. Sure HT is great an all, but a single core P4 with HT isn't going to work better than dual cores.

Anyways, some benches.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc... (has the Athlon X2 3800+ beating a bunch of Pentium Ds)

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
(has the mobile Core Duo matching the desktop Athlon X2 3800+)

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc... (has the mobile Core 2 Duo beating the mobile Core Duo)

So far what all those tests show is....

Mobile Core 2 Duo > Mobile Core Duo = Desktop Athlon 64 X2 3800+ > Pentium D

I couldn't find a benchmark showing the Pentium D being better than the regular Pentiums, but I don't think I really need to bother doing that.


RE: Customer Demand?
By yost007 on 10/26/2007 11:55:40 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
No. You would void software support by your PC manufacturer, but the hardware is still under warranty. Nice try though


Thats what a tech told me anyway when I called them to ask about installing XP. I thought it was odd that he would tell me that. Maybe it was a misunderstanding but it was hard to understand him anyway due to the heavy Indian accent. What was I trying to do anyway?

quote:
That Core 2 Duo chip is also running at 2.0 or 2.16 GHz, which is much slower than your old P4.


I was just expecting it to be on par with my old machine. When I benchmarked the 2 machines with SisSoft the laptop processor beat my old P4 by more than 240%. I was actually shocked by this score. But I did not buy this to replace my desktop. I just needed a new toy for when I am away from home.


RE: Customer Demand?
By Setsunayaki on 10/28/2007 5:24:45 PM , Rating: 1
The thing about the whole issue is coercion.

In this house we have 12 computers....At one point we tested Vista out and we hated it. We have all been using windows XP.

I walk through computer science labs and research centers. I know we just all read that Microsoft is doing well...The reality is that companies will lie in their records and pay off other companies to lie.

The reality is that at times I work fixing computers from those who ask me to fix them for money. In the last 6 months the only place I have actually seen a copy of Windows Vista are in stores like Microcenter. Everywhere else...I see XP.....

Halo is what helped microsoft this time around....Customers smartened up and DEMANDED OEMs to sell comps with XP. This is the first time a new OS is released and people demand the old version to the point that Microsoft tried to Phaze out XP and failed miserably.

quote:
That Core 2 Duo chip is also running at 2.0 or 2.16 GHz, which is much slower than your old P4.


A processor's raw performance is based on Integer and Floating Point Performance values. You have ALU and FPU performance...

You also have a second core helping you out. The Core 2 processors truly beat out anything than Intel has...I mean...they had to.....and had no choice in delivering a better product for if they did not make something better than Pentium 4s, AMD would be still selling their athlon 64s like hotcakes...


RE: Customer Demand?
By SavagePotato on 10/29/2007 9:39:42 AM , Rating: 2
Yes I realy think Microsoft has completely fabricated their financial results for the quarter. Since im pretty sure that would constitute fraud I can totaly see why they would just make up some number to make Vista look better.

Or maybe you are talking nonsense and haven't got a clue.

Take your pick on which is more likely.

The reason companies like dell started offering XP again is indeed due to consumer demand, but it has nothing to do with being smart. It has everything to do with being afraid of change and buying into false press.

I'm not sure where you work but I work for a very small isp and also do computer repair, and I see tons of vista systems, in a fairly small population center I might add.

Funny story, there was a customer that purchased a toshiba laptop a couple months back. He came back just livid about vista, claiming it was the most horrible thing ever. I forwarded him to the sales manager and sugguested he exhange for an XP laptop if he wasn't happy and never gave it another thought. The other day the guy came back in for something and turns out he ended up keeping vista, his response was now that he's spent some time with it he realised it is in fact quite good, and loves the Vista system.

That situation is what 99% of Vista dislike situations boil down to. "It's different and I feel stupid cause I don't know how to use it so XP is better, beacause I know how to use it and that makes me feel intelligent". People do not like having their lack of knowlege exposed changing things around tends to do that, and that makes them upset.


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki