Print 42 comment(s) - last by djcameron.. on Nov 1 at 3:57 PM

Boeing HALE  (Source: Boeing)
Ford provides propulsion for Boeing's latest UAV

Boeing is pushing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to the next level with the help of Ford Motor Company. The company today announced that its High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) UAV has successfully completed simulated testing.

The HALE uses a prototype hydrogen engine developed by Ford. According to the Boeing press release, the hydrogen engine is based on the Duratec 23 four-cylinder gasoline engine used in the Focus, Fusion and Escape. In this particular application, however, the engine not only runs on hydrogen, but also uses multi-stage turbocharging.

"This test demonstrates the technical readiness of the hydrogen engine system and confirms the capability breakthrough in flight endurance and altitude that could be realized by a variety of military and commercial customers," said Darryl Davis of Boeing's Advanced Precision Engagement and Mobility Systems.

"This test could help convince potential customers that hydrogen-powered aircraft are viable in the near-term," continued Boeing Advanced Systems President George Muellner. "This is a substantial step toward providing the persistent intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities our customers desire."

The test simulated four days of sustained flight -- three of which were simulated at 65,000 feet. Production versions of the HALE will be designed to stay aloft for a week and can carry up to one ton of cargo.

The military is increasingly looking to unmanned vehicles – both on land and in the air – to put human soldiers out of harm’s way. This latest development from Boeing and Ford could usher in a new era of next-generation UAVs with the stamina and payload capacity to really make a difference in the skies above the battlefield.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Glad to see...
By rtrski on 10/24/2007 5:26:35 PM , Rating: 2
With defense contract rules, they may have been required to. There's only so much of your own military production you want outsourced beyond national borders, regardless of whether the recipient company is based in a currently friendly country. Things do have a tendancy to change, and many development/procurement cycles can last decades.

I'm not trying to minimize Ford in any way, or join the whole us-vs-them innovation debate. Simply pointing out that there may have been a different reason for the selection than the technical 'best' worldwide.

RE: Glad to see...
By Polynikes on 10/24/2007 9:29:16 PM , Rating: 2
I think you're right. A foreign company, or a foreign subsidiary of a domestic company, isn't quite as trustworthy as a domestic company's domestic offices doing important military contracting. In some cases I think it is definitely in our best interest to keep some military and space projects "in-house."

RE: Glad to see...
By SigmaHyperion on 10/25/2007 10:16:07 AM , Rating: 2
Well, FWIW, the particular Ford motor they are using, the Duratec23, isn't even made in the US at all. It's made in Mexico.

RE: Glad to see...
By fictisiousname on 10/25/2007 11:03:46 AM , Rating: 2

Could it be that Boeing is using this particular motor as both comapanies can leverage costs and research off each other?

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki