Print 58 comment(s) - last by johnsonx.. on Oct 24 at 2:30 PM

Employee rides down a baggage conveyor belt  (Source: AP)
NASA kept research data private to avoid a panic

If you're afraid of flying, this recent article compiled by the Associated Press probably won't relieve any of your pre-flight stress.

After conducting an $8.5 million safety project that revealed safety problems, NASA withheld the results to avoid upsetting air passengers.  The following safety issues take place more than the public is aware - bird strikes, near mid-air collisions and runway interference.  NASA interviewed more than 24,000 commercial and private pilots over a four-year span that started in 2000 - after finishing the interviews and stopping all research, NASA has spent the past year silent about data gathered.

NASA last week requested the main contractor delete all relevant information from its computers.  According to NASA, no collected data was severe enough to warrant contacting the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  

Publishing the data could have damaged the "public's confidence in airlines and affect airline profits," said Thomas Luedtke, senior NASA official.

"If the airlines aren't safe I want to know about it," said Rep. Brad Miller, R-N.C., chairman of the House Science and Technology investigations and oversight subcommittee.  "I would rather not feel a false sense of security because they don't tell us," he added.

The House Science and Technology committee will now reportedly launch an investigation, also warning NASA and its contractor to not delete any documents.

Due to the AP article published in the morning, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said the U.S. space agency will work to try and find a way some of the information can be published for everyone.  The information "should be widely available and subject to review and scrutiny," he said in an official NASA statement.

NASA Ames Research Center officials want to publish a public report before 2008.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: We paid for it.
By mdogs444 on 10/23/2007 11:50:02 AM , Rating: 2
I would argue that perhaps not releasing the report could be more costly in the long-term, if it means bad systems will remain in place and an otherwise avoidable crash will happen. Yeah. That would be bad for profits, no? Especially if it stems from a problem uncovered in this report.

You are making a guess that NASA is completely discarded the results and not going to use them for any good. All we know is the results are not being made public. It does not mean that NASA (or the govt) cannot (or will not) work with airlines authorities to build better solutions.

RE: We paid for it.
By Aeonic on 10/23/2007 12:37:09 PM , Rating: 2
Well, they're not going to the FAA with the report. They've apparently sat on it for a year. Maybe I'm a cynic, but I don't see them having a fireside chat with the CEO of USAir over it.

RE: We paid for it.
By mdogs444 on 10/23/2007 1:38:51 PM , Rating: 2
They may develop internally things to change for safety and present them to the FAA. Just because they dont make the physical report available doesnt mean there aren't alternative solutions.

"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki