Print 95 comment(s) - last by Laughing all t.. on Oct 23 at 6:43 PM

AMD "Barcelona" die shot  (Source: AMD)
AMD records a loss for the third straight quarter

Earlier this week, DailyTech reported that were things were looking rosy for the Intel folks in Santa Clara, California. The company reported that its profits were up 43 percent on revenues of $10.1 billion USD.

Today, it was AMD's turn to report its Q3 earnings results. AMD recorded revenue of $1.632 billion USD -- this represented an 18 percent increase from Q2 2007. However, AMD reported an operating loss of $226 million USD and a net loss of $396 million USD -- this compares to a $611 million USD net loss for Q1 and a $600 million USD net loss for Q2.

Part of AMD's losses during Q3 can be attributed to its acquisition of ATI Technologies in 2006. The company is still reeling from the purchase and recorded a $78 million USD charge as a result. The ATI-related charge involved costs related to integration and severance packages. Another $42 million USD charge was recorded in relation to Spansion.

On a more positive note, the introduction of ATI's Radeon HD 2000 series GPUs resulted in a 29 percent increase in graphics revenue to $252 million USD. AMD also noted that its Radeon HD 2000 series GPUs are now featured in desktop and notebook systems from Dell, HP, Lenovo and Toshiba.

During 2007, AMD has racked up enormous debt and experienced losses in every quarter. Former ATI president CEO Dave Orton left in July after successfully leading the charge to integrate the two tech companies. AMD also lost executive vice president and chief sales and marketing officer Henri Richard in late November. The following month, AMD vice president of worldwide sales Rick Hegberg packed his bags and headed for the door.

AMD still has room for improvement in the form of its new quad-core 65nm Barcelona architecture. The company launched its Barcelona-based Opteron server processors in early September with speeds up to 2.0GHz. 2.3GHz models are in the pipeline for Q4 2007.

Quad-core desktop Phenom 2.2GHz (Phenom 9500) and 2.4GHz (Phenom 9600) processors will launch late next month, while a 2.6GHz (Phenom 9700) processor will be ready for December. AMD will later tackle the high-end desktop market with the Phenom FX-82 during the first half of 2008.

AMD also threw a bit of a curve ball with the announcement of a triple-core Phenom processor family. The triple-core processors logically fit between AMD's dual-core and quad-core offerings and will bring "true multi-core technology to a broader audience," according to the company.

The next few months won't be easy for AMD, however. Although it has a new CPU architecture on tap, Intel is not standing still. Intel is always one step ahead of AMD when it comes to process technology and its 45nm Penryn-based Xeon processors will launch November 12, while its Penryn-based desktop processors should be available before the end of the year.

In addition, Intel will refresh its 45nm architecture in the summer of 2008 with Nehalem, while a 32nm refresh called Westmere will be in place for 2009.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I've been waiting
By psyph3r on 10/19/2007 11:34:09 AM , Rating: -1
For reviews I'm using an intel core 2, but For my gaming system, I'm still using my 3500+. I have 1200$ saved up for my next cpu(cpu only) purchase and it isn't going to intel . Most of my amd friends are in the same boat(screwed by 939 abandonment)...waiting for the barcelona/phenom. I'm positive their next cpu release will be very profitable. Whether or not they are faster, amd cpu's give me a tangible(but personal) difference in gaming quality that intel hasn't matched. I think it has everything to do with the Hyper Transport, but i haven't put my finger on it yet.

RE: I've been waiting
By sxr7171 on 10/19/2007 12:27:17 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah your choice of CPU manufacturer changes the "quality" of gaming. Just like I take better sh!ts when I wear certain brands of underwear.

RE: I've been waiting
By psyph3r on 10/19/07, Rating: 0
RE: I've been waiting
By Justin Case on 10/19/2007 11:49:05 PM , Rating: 2
Well, I'm not sure about gaming, but I can tell you that I generally prefer Intel systems for render nodes (faster performance) and AMD systems for workstations (more responsive for interactive tasks). With the P4 the difference was huge, it moved like a truck. Core / Core2 is much better, but Opteron systems still feel more responsive, even if their top speed is lower.

RE: I've been waiting
By Master Kenobi on 10/19/2007 2:36:34 PM , Rating: 3
I think your crazy actually. There is no advantage to AMD except in your head. Performance of AMD chips lags behind Intel by a fair margin.

Your "difference in gaming quality" likely has more to do with your choice of graphics card, memory, and motherboard than your CPU.

RE: I've been waiting
By psyph3r on 10/19/07, Rating: -1
RE: I've been waiting
By Accord99 on 10/19/2007 9:21:30 PM , Rating: 2
Has intel matched power consumption and clock rate vs performance?

The C2D is well ahead in both counts, the 4MB C2Ds match up well with 25% higher clocked A64s and use less power then a similar clocked A64.

RE: I've been waiting
By bangmal on 10/20/07, Rating: 0
RE: I've been waiting
By Strunf on 10/20/2007 8:43:47 PM , Rating: 3
Blame AMD not Intel for its 3 years old architecture...

RE: I've been waiting
By Accord99 on 10/21/2007 4:50:13 AM , Rating: 2
25% is how much faster an A64 X2 must be clocked to match the performance of a C2D in typical applications. The C2D in specialized code is much faster than 25% compared to the A64.

As for power, the superior power consumption of the C2D means its easier to keep cool and quiet, enables better battery life in notebooks or better components for the same thermal envelop.

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
Related Articles
Intel Quarterly Profit up 43 Percent
October 16, 2007, 9:39 PM
AMD Sheds Additional Phenom Details
October 15, 2007, 10:48 AM
Intel Shows Off 32nm Test Shuttle
September 18, 2007, 4:34 PM
Intel Sets Official "Penryn" Launch Date
September 18, 2007, 1:17 PM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki