backtop


Print 40 comment(s) - last by HighWing.. on Oct 22 at 1:31 PM

Who says Apple Inc. doesn't have a heart?

Apple Inc. CEO, Steve Jobs posted a letter on Apple's website that left some happy and others scratching their heads. "Let me just say it: We want native third party applications on the iPhone, and we plan to have an SDK in developers’ hands in February," Jobs stated in the letter.

This announcement seems in stark contrast to previous Apple policy, including its firmware update v1.1.1, which turns iPhones and iPod Touches with unauthorized third party applications into "iBricks" and in standard phones locks the file system from users installing third party applications.  This update has led to two pending class action lawsuits.

Others may note that February seems like a long time away and wonder at why the SDK will take so long to be released.  Jobs said that the reason for the delay is to make sure the iPhone and iPod Touch are protected against malware and viruses.  The devices are far more vulnerable to virus than most people think according to Jobs.

"Since the iPhone is the most advanced phone ever, it will be a highly visible target," Jobs continued. He went on to say that the months of patience will be rewarded by He said that the months of patience will be rewarded by "Many years of great third party applications running on safe and reliable iPhones."

There are a broad array of third party programs for the iPhone and iPod Touch that do everything from instant messaging to phone unlocking.

Third party developers are greeting the news with guarded optimism.  One third party developer, based out of Denver said "I'm thrilled.  I hope it is exactly as they say, full third-party development."

Apple Inc., originally Apple Computer, has had a long history of trying to keep technology proprietary and avoid licensing its designs or allowing third party development.  Many see this as a major reason why it originally fell from dominance in the personal computer market to a small market share.

Apple made no indication, unfortunately for some, that it was going to make any effort to "unbrick" iPhones and iPod Touches that had unauthorized third party apps and had been made into paperweights by the v1.1.1 firmware update.  It did not announce any programs to unfreeze these phones or to provide warranty service for them.

Apple's position appears to be that until developers adopt the official SDK, which will arrive in February, using their applications violates the iPod Touch and iPhone warranties, as they see it as a form of "modification."

Apple has also not stated whether future version of the firmware will retract the change, or whether they will continue to brick iDevices with unauthorized third party applications.

Apple is remaining firm on its stance about unlocking: Unlock your iPhone and update, and you phone will be dead.  If you don't like it, they say, buy a new iPhone and don't unlock it.

Apple will begin selling unlocked iPhones -- but currently in France only, as French law mandates them to.

Despite some people's concerns, many feel this move is a step in the right direction by Apple and demonstrates a degree of learning from their past mistakes.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: End of Days
By GaryJohnson on 10/19/2007 12:47:11 PM , Rating: 2
Yes exactly, but that does include malicious software disguised as something benign like freeware bust-a-move games or tip calculators. This is probably what you'd have to be concerned about with the iPhone as well.

There are other potential points of entry for bad code on windows mobile, like java midlets. I'm not sure exactly how malicious you can be with a midlet though.


RE: End of Days
By kelmon on 10/19/2007 1:15:16 PM , Rating: 2
Some people are going to hate this but I'm very much in favour of it. Rumor (yeah, OK...) has it that both Apple and Nokia are looking to provide central repositories of "blessed" applications that users can install from. The benefit of this is that all applications will have been vetted as being OK, both from a functional and security perspective. The downside of this is that developers won't be able to release applications that Apple doesn't like, either because they are bad applications or perhaps do something that is contrary to Apple's business model (definitely into iffy territory there). It very much depends on how heavy-handed Apple would be as to how well this would work, plus how quickly they can vet applications submitted to them before making them available to Joe Public. It remains to be seen whether this will happen (no doubt the arrival of the SDK will answer that) but there is a lot to be said for only downloading applications from a trusted source.


RE: End of Days
By TomZ on 10/19/2007 1:44:47 PM , Rating: 2
I think this is realistically the only way you can secure the platform - by having third-party apps certified in the way you describe.

That doesn't exclude, however, the possibility that Apple will allow non-certified apps to executed. In this case, the device might give some extra security warnings compared to certified apps.


RE: End of Days
By kelmon on 10/20/2007 6:08:40 AM , Rating: 2
I think that this is what is coming in Leopard and therefore probably already exists in the iPhone - digital signatures for applications. I guess the theory is that if you download an application that has been appropriately signed then you can feel safer about running it but if the application doesn't have such a signature (or a bad one) then it's a case of "buyer beware" and it's your own choice to take the risk or not.

I do wonder, however, what level of confidence can be assigned to a signed application. What will it take to get a signature and can they be spoofed? Again, I'm sure we'll be hearing much more about this towards the start of 2008.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki