backtop


Print 16 comment(s) - last by SilthDraeth.. on Oct 23 at 9:31 AM

Testimony from Jammie Thomas' case discredit the litany of figures quoted over the years

In continuing with the theme of insights gleaned from Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas, I bring you yet another wonderful little tidbit to drop from the mouth of Sony’s Head of Litigation, Jennifer Pariser: Sony – and likely the RIAA – doesn’t really know just how much money they’ve lost due to piracy.
 
In the same block of testimony where the Pariser disclosed that the RIAA’s lawsuit campaign is costing “millions” more than it earns, Thomas’ counsel pounced on the fact that the record industry was only seeking the punitive damages available in the Copyright Act. “What are your actual damages?” he asked.
 
Here we go. “We haven't stopped to calculate the amount of damages we've suffered due to downloading,” replied Pariser, who then added that, “that's not what's at issue here.” (Judge Michael Davis, who was overseeing the case, quickly remanded her to stay on topic.)
 
This statement runs counter to the numerous claims that the RIAA has made over the years regarding piracy and the industry’s actual suffering. One of the more recent claims, found under the “students doing reports” FAQ section of the RIAA’s web site, cites a conservative estimate of $300 million worth of losses. Another study, released by the Institute for Policy Innovation, quoted worldwide losses due to piracy at $12.5 billion USD and over 71,000 jobs.
 
Pariser could have easily cited either of those numbers as part of her explanation of ‘actual damages’ – unless, of course, the facts regarding that those figures are less than certain. Remember, she’s under oath here.
 
Over the years, there’s been a long tradition in debunking the dollar amounts that the RIAA has cited as money lost due to so-called piracy. People find all sorts of interesting explanations: lost CD sales are actually converted to music purchases at iTunes, lost CD sales are due to a decreased demand and rising prices, that piracy actually helps to promote the purchases of music, and so on and so forth. While I’m not going to argue that piracy doesn’t have some kind of effect, it does seem that if the industry wants to convince more government officials of its plight, at least it could get its figures straight.
 
When and if the music industry releases some honest-to-God figured that aren’t skewed, the big question then becomes one of trust: can we believe those numbers? Will we, the people, ever believe a word to come out of their mouths?


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Tom Milhauz on 10/22/2007 8:48:17 AM , Rating: 2
I remember a couple of years ago in the Czech republic, a CD cost like $20 and the average income was about $300 a month. They wondered why people aren't buying...


By SilthDraeth on 10/23/2007 9:31:01 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly. Lets say figuratively, thats $10 a day, (of course you do not work all 30 days), I can't afford 2 days pay on a CD. I do not make a lot for a stateside job in Southern California, but that would be the equivalent of me spending $300 on a CD.


“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads

Related Articles
















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki