Print 61 comment(s) - last by boredg.. on Nov 14 at 2:27 AM

TIME has picked its winner for the most revolutionary invention of the year and its not a cancer drug, its the iPhone.

Every year, TIME magazine picks a person of the year and an invention of the year.  This year it went for a democratic process for the invention of the year via web-based voting.

The results will likely be controversial.  The invention of the year is the...iPhone.  While 2007, may be known to many DailyTech readers as the year of iBrick, TIME writer Lev Grossman glosses over the negatives and lavishes praise upon the iPhone.

"Yes, there's been a lot of hype written about the iPhone, and a lot of guff too.  So much so that it seems weird to add more, after Danny Fanboy and Bobby McBlogger have had their day. But when that day is over, Apple's iPhone is still the best thing invented this year," states Grossman.

Grossman is eager to overlook Apple's less favorable press, which is not even explicitly mentioned in his article -- iBricking, iFires, environmental concerns, and class action lawsuits.  Instead he focuses on why he thinks the iPhone is the most revolutionary thing invented in 2007.

His first reason is that "It is pretty".  That is literally his first reason, no you did not read wrong.  Grossman argues that beauty is something that is frequently lost in the field of electronics.  He describes the iPhones functions saying, "An example: look at what happens when you put the iPhone into ‘airplane’ mode (i.e., no cell service, WiFi, etc.). A tiny little orange airplane zooms into the menu bar!  Cute, you might say. But cute little touches like that are part of what makes the iPhone usable in a world of useless gadgets."

The second reason Grossman gives is because it is "touchy-feely."  Grossman states that Apple did not invent or even reinvent the touch screen, but rather knew what to do with it.  To some extent few can argue this point with him -- even Apple's harshest critics would mostly agree the fully touch driven interface is at least somewhat original.

Grossman goes on to state that the iPhone will make other phones better.  It will do so by encouraging phones to adopt AT&T/Apple-esque contracts.  Grossman skips over any negatives to the consumer and enthusiastically hails these contracts as providing the hardware developer (in this case Apple) with unprecedented freedom, which he feels leads to great products (like the iPhone).

Grossman also argues that it is a platform that will be built upon.  He points to the applications already running on it, such as Google Maps.  He also points out that third party applications will be coming in 2008, as reported by DailyTech.  He fails to mention, though, that if you currently try to fill your iPhone with third party applications and you update your firmware update, you will be the owner of a new iBrick.

Finally Grossman points out that the iPhone is only the first of many phones to come.  The iPhone, having sold 1.4 million units during Apple's recent quarter, has had sufficient success to warrant hardware refreshes akin to the iPod.  Grossman points out, accurately, how far the iPod has evolved from its early clunky ancestors.

So there you have it -- your TIME invention of the year is neither a new medical treatment nor a new space engine or plane -- the invention of the year is Apple's controversial iPhone.  Will the public agree with TIME's pick?  Will Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs be TIME's man of the year?  Will they even care?  The answers are still up in the air.  However the real debate lies among the technophiles and the consumers, who ultimately decide whether the iPhone is the most revolutionary invention of 2008, or just a closed-system replete with draconian restraints.  The future success of the iPhone rests on their decision.

(For those interested, one of the cooler runners-up was WowWee's remote control FlyTech Dragonfly, weighing it at about 1 oz. and as the world's first commercially available ornithopter.  It is available for only a scant $50 USD and features a flight time of 6 minutes on a 20 min charge)

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Perspective
By Lightning III on 11/6/2007 12:52:30 PM , Rating: 0
how magnanumus of you, will you say the same when they name Al Gore the person of the year

RE: Perspective
By TomZ on 11/6/2007 2:26:45 PM , Rating: 1
Even the thought makes me feel sick to my stomach.

I think that in just a few years, Gore will be recognized as the charlatan that he is, once more of the research and debate comes out.

RE: Perspective
By Master Kenobi on 11/6/2007 2:56:09 PM , Rating: 3
No. When that happens he will claim that his public awareness and preventative measures taken around the globe have averted a crisis of epic proportions. He will win the Nobel Prize again that year.

RE: Perspective
By Lightning III on 11/6/07, Rating: 0
RE: Perspective
By TomZ on 11/6/2007 5:12:27 PM , Rating: 2
It's really got nothing to do with being "pollution loving" - it's because Gore uses FUD as a tool to further his environmental goals. To "asherites" (or others interested in the truth) FUD is bad, but hey, if you're okay with it, go ahead and follow his preachings. But accept that you will have to accept the label of "gorite" in return.

RE: Perspective
By SavagePotato on 11/6/2007 6:43:26 PM , Rating: 2
I hope being a gorite doesn't involve similar behaviors to being a gorean, but with 100% more al Gore.

If you wanted to get sick to your stomach, think on that comparison for a while.

RE: Perspective
By Hacp on 11/9/2007 11:53:21 PM , Rating: 2
What is the neo-conservative movement? It is a movement that emphasizes outliers, misinformation, and pseudo-science in order to "debate" about scientific issues that are harmful to the interest of the wealthy and powerful.
One example would be Bush's claim that further research was needed when confronted with Global Warming. Yet, he didn't look back on his precious missile defense system even when a majority of scientists claimed that further technological breakthroughs needed to be made in order to even begin thinking about a missile defense system.

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki