Print 52 comment(s) - last by sinsubtitulos.. on Oct 12 at 4:22 PM

ioDrive Storage device  (Source: Fusion-io)
ioDATA drive promises vastly superior enterprise level read and write performance at a hefty price

Most computer users want faster hard drives to aide in faster boot times and application loading. Solid state drives (SSDs) promised to improve our load times and they did to some degree.

If a measly 64GB solid state drive just doesn’t cut it for your needs, Fusion-io has a new 640GB flash based hard drive that slips into a PCI-Express x4 slot. Fusion-io promises some very swift speeds from the drive in the neighborhood of 600 Mbytes/sec sustained write speed (4000Mbytes/sec random) and 800 Mbytes/sec sustained read (8,000 Mbytes/sec random).

The ioDrive has no moving parts to increase the lifespan and reduce the risk of failure. If more capacity is needed scaling is possible by adding more ioDrive cards to the system. The sustained data transfer rates that Fusion-io promises (PDF) are vastly superior to other enterprise level storage devices on the market such as Ultra SCSI and SAS storage devices.

Supported operating systems include Linux Red Hat AS4.0, Windows Vista and Windows XP. The catch to go along with all of the performance the ioDrive promises is that the 640GB version costs a massive $19,000 USD. Gizmodo is reporting that when the 640GB drive is released in Q1 2008 80GB, 160GB, and 320GB versions will also be available.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: untitled
By scrapsma54 on 10/10/2007 9:30:46 AM , Rating: 0
It's flash memory, so eventually too many R/W will burn out cells one by one as the drive is filled, but that isn't to bad considering the time it takes. But 640GB should last. The question is how much cpu usage does using x4 pci-e chop off? Either way I don't think $20G is worth the benefit over a $200 640GB raid 0. Don't you think? Only DJ's have the kind of money and time for this kind of stuff. This brings us back to the $20G Optimus keyboard.

RE: untitled
By TomZ on 10/10/2007 9:37:35 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, that's right, since flash is typically only good for 1 million cycles minimum. LOL.

RE: untitled
By ksherman on 10/10/2007 10:25:01 AM , Rating: 2
Whats more, the controllers on the memory monitor which blocks have been written to the most and intelligently write to the memory evenly, thus the life of the flash memory really is quite long, probably even more reliable and longer lasting than a mechanical magnetic hard drive.

RE: untitled
By Dactyl on 10/10/2007 3:50:13 PM , Rating: 2
By the time your drive dies (actually, it will simply shrink in size as portions of it go bad) . . . you will be able to buy a flash drive bigger than a TB for under $1,000.

HDDs, on the other hand, can seize up and die at any moment.

RE: untitled
By Parhel on 10/10/2007 4:58:53 PM , Rating: 2
What happens if it shrinks too much and can no longer fit in the PCI slot because it's too small? Huh? What then?

RE: untitled
By leexgx on 10/10/2007 6:03:09 PM , Rating: 1
you jokeing ?

any way if done right it take Upto 8 years before some Blocks on the flash start to die and what should happen in windows you see that the Total space will start to go smaller dono if Norm SSD disks do this (the 32/64GB ones)

one other thing should be Noted Defraging is point less
as well as all parts of the disk have the same speed Fragmented or not as the access time is 0.2ms min,max and typical per i think 1000 I/O's (mite be even more then that)
on flash it allso more likey damage it when useing defrag as it has to move data around can make the drive fail sooner

Speed if done right Sata 150/300 will be the liming factor for data speed on SSD drives, PCI-e on the other had can have 256MB/s just on PCI-e 1x so an 2x PCI-E can have 512MB/s (allso rember its Full duplex on PCI-e so its 256mb send /256mb recive total 512mb)

Static is more likey to tost one fo these things before thay fail

RE: untitled
By leexgx on 10/10/2007 6:17:40 PM , Rating: 2
heh it uses PCI-E 4x so its got 1GB/s both ways

booting with this puppy you be limted to the probing stages of Bios/windows/linux when starting up

but £10,000 for it seems an little extream but one day it will replace Spinning disks (about time to taken them to long or Payed Not to make them)

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
Related Articles
SanDisk Announces 64GB SSDs
June 4, 2007, 7:08 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki