A Good Radiohead for Business?
October 1, 2007 1:27 PM
comment(s) - last by
Radiohead to give away free download of new album
Major political alt-rockers Radiohead have a new album that is brewing a storm of interest due to its unique distribution model. The band will distribute the new album
independent of a major record label from their webpage.
Fans have two options for acquiring the new album. The first is a discbox set containing CDs, heavyweight 12” vinyls, supplementary artwork, extra tracks and booklets. This package costs 40 pounds, about $81.75 U.S., includes an on-line download, and is set to ship by December 3, 2007.
The real head-turner here is option number two: download the album at whatever price you choose. That’s right, customers are given the option to pay anywhere from zero to 99.99 GBP, the latter limited by the size of the price entry field.
The full length MP3 set will be available for download on October 10, 2007 using an activation code e-mailed to customers who choose to “purchase” the download. Customers purchasing the discbox will also be able to download the album on the tenth.
It is hard to say at this point whether this approach will prove to be a competitive business model, but it is certain to generate tremendous interest and accolades from Radiohead’s fans.
It is more difficult than one might think to argue against this model considering the nature of the Web 2.0 economy.
Many of the Internet’s most popular products, Google, Yahoo! Mail and Wikipedia, all give the majority of their content to users for free. Further more the barrier to piracy is so low that most content can be taken for free by anyone willing. Author Chris Anderson, “The Long Tail” is going to explore this topic in his next work, tentatively called “
Free: The Past and Future of a Radical Price
So what we have here is an outline of a business model for the “Brave Free World.” Embrace the fee-free zeitgeist of the web. Decriminalize the consumers who won’t pay for content. Maximize your profit by capturing the most wealthy few percentile of customers by maximizing their exposure to your core product.
In this case the core product is Radiohead, not the album. Giving away the album should greatly broaden its distribution and the exposure of wealthy consumers. They will capture the wealth of this upper crust through high value packages like the discbox, world tours, and who knows what other cool things that are worth paying for.
The only piece of the Web 2.0 business model that Radiohead’s plan is missing is embedded advertising. Given the band’s philosophies, I don’t think we will be seeing this anytime soon.
I know everyone is wondering, so I did some research and yes, entering zero for price really does work. This is not the worst thing that could happen to the band since I will pay for concert tickets to see the band, as I have before, and if the album knocks my socks off I will also pay for a hard copy of the CD.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/5/2007 12:47:27 PM
money is made from touring and merch, period.
Some bands don't like to tour. Portishead comes to mind as one of those. They're also heavily produced. Yet I also consider them to be quite unique, not to mention talented. I don't think that the business model should change so drastically that groups like these cannot maintain some profitability for their efforts.
Sure, I don't like Britney much either - but you have to admit, she looked pretty good in red PVC. In any case, it's not for you or eye to judge for anyone but ourselves. The artists or the rights purchasers ought to be able to maintain rights over their art.
I'm curious, would you consider the likes of JK Rowling to also be required to do tours in order to make a living with the novel itself at the mercy of counterfeiters? Or how about movie actors and their entourage have their movies act as merely a front to their Broadway performances? How about the rights of models to their images? Should the rights over the images have no protection at all so that models and their agencies can only make money from live appearances where there's a cover charge? Why is it that most people in these forums seem to think that only musicians shouldn't be afforded protection over their copyrights? Maybe drug companies shouldn't have their drugs protected if someone can synthesize the same medication, and the pharmaceuticals should have to do lecture circuits in order to earn a wage. By the way, I've seen Stallone's small yacht (I seem to recall it had only 3 floors with capacity of around 200). Well, it seemed small compared to the pharmaceutical owners boat (although I can't remember the bugger's name). Those government protected and regulated drug lords make a pretty penny I tell you.
I might not like the RIAA very much, but they're nonetheless doing something very important: letting Americans know that they can no longer steal artists' work.
Culture, society, the law need to work together to protect the distribution rights of artists in a fair way that gives control over the sale entirely to the rights holder while maintaining fair rights usage to the individual who purchases a legitimate copy. Regardless of whether or not the artist wishes to tour, they should have access to whatever business model they want and have people who want their music decide whether or not the price they're asking is worth paying for the pleasure that the music brings to them.
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
Latest By Andrew Campbell
Sony's Platinum MusicPass: Teaching An Old Model New Tricks
January 9, 2008, 2:27 PM
Fujitsu Fights CO2 Emissions
December 11, 2007, 10:24 AM
"Internet Dissent" Key Issue in U.S.-China Commission Results
November 16, 2007, 10:06 AM
"Electronic Jihad" November 11 Attack Fails to Materialize
November 13, 2007, 2:23 PM
HyperSpace: A New Hope (For Windows Users)
November 7, 2007, 9:36 AM
U.S. Marine Corps to Virtualize IT Infrastructure
October 31, 2007, 12:11 PM
iPhone Stokes 50% Increase in Google Mobile Maps
October 16, 2007, 2:29 PM
Arse Elektronika: Innovation Through Pornography
October 12, 2007, 5:18 AM
Google: $600 and Counting
October 10, 2007, 12:36 PM
Initial Thoughts of Joost 1.0
October 8, 2007, 10:39 AM
Facebook Will Force Android, iOS Users to Use Messenger App This Week
July 29, 2014, 11:26 AM
Amazon Launches 3D Printing Store
July 28, 2014, 1:00 PM
Google to Announce $1 Billion Twitch Purchase
July 25, 2014, 12:33 PM
Quick Note: European Central Bank Hacked, Personal Information Stolen
July 24, 2014, 5:20 PM
EU Privacy Watchdogs Meet with Google Over "Right to be Forgotten" Requests
July 24, 2014, 12:29 PM
Report: New UK Broadband Users Give Porn Filters the Shaft
July 23, 2014, 11:49 AM
Most Popular Articles
Kindle Fire Phone Review Roundup -- A Solid "Meh"
July 23, 2014, 2:09 PM
Ford Details ’15 F-150’s 325hp, 2.7L EcoBoost V6; Demonstrates 732-lb Weight Loss
July 22, 2014, 6:55 PM
Windows 9 Will Merge Windows, Windows Phone, Windows RT in 2015
July 23, 2014, 3:33 PM
Comcast Memo: Harassing Customers During Retention Calls Actually IS Our Policy
July 22, 2014, 5:19 PM
Sony's Xperia Z3 Gets Detailed in Leaked Photos
July 25, 2014, 2:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information