A Good Radiohead for Business?
October 1, 2007 1:27 PM
comment(s) - last by
Radiohead to give away free download of new album
Major political alt-rockers Radiohead have a new album that is brewing a storm of interest due to its unique distribution model. The band will distribute the new album
independent of a major record label from their webpage.
Fans have two options for acquiring the new album. The first is a discbox set containing CDs, heavyweight 12” vinyls, supplementary artwork, extra tracks and booklets. This package costs 40 pounds, about $81.75 U.S., includes an on-line download, and is set to ship by December 3, 2007.
The real head-turner here is option number two: download the album at whatever price you choose. That’s right, customers are given the option to pay anywhere from zero to 99.99 GBP, the latter limited by the size of the price entry field.
The full length MP3 set will be available for download on October 10, 2007 using an activation code e-mailed to customers who choose to “purchase” the download. Customers purchasing the discbox will also be able to download the album on the tenth.
It is hard to say at this point whether this approach will prove to be a competitive business model, but it is certain to generate tremendous interest and accolades from Radiohead’s fans.
It is more difficult than one might think to argue against this model considering the nature of the Web 2.0 economy.
Many of the Internet’s most popular products, Google, Yahoo! Mail and Wikipedia, all give the majority of their content to users for free. Further more the barrier to piracy is so low that most content can be taken for free by anyone willing. Author Chris Anderson, “The Long Tail” is going to explore this topic in his next work, tentatively called “
Free: The Past and Future of a Radical Price
So what we have here is an outline of a business model for the “Brave Free World.” Embrace the fee-free zeitgeist of the web. Decriminalize the consumers who won’t pay for content. Maximize your profit by capturing the most wealthy few percentile of customers by maximizing their exposure to your core product.
In this case the core product is Radiohead, not the album. Giving away the album should greatly broaden its distribution and the exposure of wealthy consumers. They will capture the wealth of this upper crust through high value packages like the discbox, world tours, and who knows what other cool things that are worth paying for.
The only piece of the Web 2.0 business model that Radiohead’s plan is missing is embedded advertising. Given the band’s philosophies, I don’t think we will be seeing this anytime soon.
I know everyone is wondering, so I did some research and yes, entering zero for price really does work. This is not the worst thing that could happen to the band since I will pay for concert tickets to see the band, as I have before, and if the album knocks my socks off I will also pay for a hard copy of the CD.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/2/2007 2:23:24 PM
Radiohead offers new album online, allows consumers to decide price
A very successful touring band with over 10 million albums sold, all of which it owes entirely to the 'old' business model (representing those corporate interests against which their political music loved to rail), decides it can well-afford to experiment with a new business model that lets consumers decide whether to pay (or not) thanks to the millions of dollars and fame it already made on the 'old' business model, and in doing so, tells not-yet-known bands its too bad for them that they were born 10 years too late.
It is indeed a brilliant marketing plan. How do you get people to actually buy your music? You don't! Give the music away [ostensibly] for nothing, hitching your [marketing] wagon to a wave of anti-RIAA sentiment, and all the lemmings will want to reward you by paying $80 for a nifty merchandizing fan-pack.
Totally self-serving, devilishly manipulative, and completely contrary to the band's perceived 'altuistic' or 'common good' political pretenses, but brilliant.
Reminds me of when Justin Frankel decried AOL for being so profit-minded and that, as a new shareholder, he wanted AOL to be a more charitable corporate citizen...
Frankel got his $50 million from AOL, of course. lol!
i.e. "OK, I've got my $50 million, now I want the company to be kinder, gentler, and less profit minded."
I guess Frankel overlooked that AOL had already performed one of the most charitable gestures in corporate history - paying many times more for Nullsoft than it was worth (irrational exuberance being a sign of those times and all).
10/2/2007 2:59:18 PM
You need to keep in mind two things, though.
1.) A distribution method like this wouldn't have been possible 10 years ago. Even
Radiohead had wanted to do something like this, how would they go about it? Send you the CD for free and then ask you to send back some cash if you like it? No sir, that wouldn't work at all. Only with the recent boom of a digital distribution of music would this be possible.
2.) Radiohead isn't the first band to do this. One example that comes to mind is of the indie progressive metal band, the pax cecilia. They had a similar distribution method. You could download their album for free or give like a $10 donation, or you could order their CD for a slightly higher fee. Nobody made any fuss about this because, well, nobody has heard of the pax cecilia. In order for a distribution method like this to become accepted it'll take a well known name like Radiohead (that has presence in the market and an established fanbase) to push it forward.
Saying that this is Radiohead's way of saying sorry to new indies bands is just a little unfair, especially since I think this distribution method could be more profitable for bands than the old one.
"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
Latest By Andrew Campbell
Sony's Platinum MusicPass: Teaching An Old Model New Tricks
January 9, 2008, 2:27 PM
Fujitsu Fights CO2 Emissions
December 11, 2007, 10:24 AM
"Internet Dissent" Key Issue in U.S.-China Commission Results
November 16, 2007, 10:06 AM
"Electronic Jihad" November 11 Attack Fails to Materialize
November 13, 2007, 2:23 PM
HyperSpace: A New Hope (For Windows Users)
November 7, 2007, 9:36 AM
U.S. Marine Corps to Virtualize IT Infrastructure
October 31, 2007, 12:11 PM
iPhone Stokes 50% Increase in Google Mobile Maps
October 16, 2007, 2:29 PM
Arse Elektronika: Innovation Through Pornography
October 12, 2007, 5:18 AM
Google: $600 and Counting
October 10, 2007, 12:36 PM
Initial Thoughts of Joost 1.0
October 8, 2007, 10:39 AM
Newegg Legal Chief: "We don't Feed the Trolls"; Defeats Bell Lab Shell Comp.
May 17, 2013, 10:11 AM
Quick Note: EA Axing Online Pass
May 16, 2013, 10:59 AM
Google's Eric Schmidt: "Don't Be Evil" was Stupid
May 14, 2013, 11:00 AM
RIAA Acknowledges Digital Streams for Artist Awards
May 13, 2013, 7:17 AM
ESPN Looking to Pay Wireless Carriers for Customer Data Overages
May 10, 2013, 11:21 AM
YouTube Offering Paid Subscriptions for Individual Channels
May 10, 2013, 10:50 AM
Most Popular Articles
Report: Microsoft Eyes Return to "Dying" Windows 7 Path After Windows 8 Flop
May 13, 2013, 9:50 AM
Windows 8.1 Will Be Free; Microsoft Holds Onto Struggling ARM Variant
May 14, 2013, 2:57 PM
Bill Gates Gets Teary-Eyed While Discussing Steve Jobs, Shows Off Life-Saving Tech on 60 Minutes
May 13, 2013, 12:30 PM
Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates
May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM
Google's Eric Schmidt: "Don't Be Evil" was Stupid
May 14, 2013, 11:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
Elon Musk Willing to Spend More Money on Widening of 405 Freeway
Apr 26, 2013, 7:28 PM
New $100 Bill Due in October
Apr 24, 2013, 11:52 PM
Volkswagen Shows off iBeetle in Shanghai
Apr 22, 2013, 9:29 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information