backtop


Print 74 comment(s) - last by elpresidente20.. on Oct 16 at 2:34 AM


The XEL-1 OLED TV sports vivid color and contrast.  (Source: Sony Japan)

The XEL-1 OLED TV's razor thin profile.  (Source: Sony Japan)
Sony introduced the world's first OLED TV, which is quite a looker, carries a high price tag, and is only available in Japan

At 3 millimeters thin, Sony’s XEL-1 OLED TV seems to float on the air.  The almost paper-thin display hovers ethereally mounted on a beam, which is juxtaposed onto a thick pedestal base, which sharply contrasts the screens thickness.  The design of the device is very similar to the "Anglepoise" Mac and very modern in design.

The 11-inch XEL-1 brings a lot of innovation to the table at a relatively high price.  The unit, set to go on sale December 1 in Japan only, was unveiled on Sony Japan's website over the weekend. 

The device will cost ¥200,000, or around $1,744 USD -- about twice the price of a 40" LCD TV in Japan.

Overall (base included) the device has measurements of 287×253×140mm and weighs in at 2 kilograms (4.4 pounds).  It sports a 1080p input resolution, though the screen resolution only measures 960 x 540, so it downscales the image to fit the screen.

One of its more impressive features is a sharp
1,000,000:1 contrast ratio and the 45W power consumption.  According to Sony, this represents a 40 percent power reduction over conventional LCD monitors.

Sony touts the device as a display revolution.  They claim that the device has very fast response times -- up to 1,000 times faster than LCD displays -- though no test information was presented to support these claims.

The XEL-1 also boasts superior color and brightness.  The brightness is due to the OLEDs' natural electroluminescence as well as reflected light, which reflects off of "micro-cavities" within the OLED.  The end result, according to Sony, is a much brighter TV without the need for backlights.  The color is also superior and more natural according to Sony.  They explain that with flexible brightness, it is easier to reproduce the full spectrum of colors than in a device which can only be backlit or dark.

In the past, OLED displays have been crippled due to a relatively short lifespan compared to LCDs.  The XEL-1 seems to have this covered, with a declared 30,000 hour lifespan (roughly the equivalent of watching TV eight hours a day for ten years).  An average LCD lifespan is 50,000 hours, so while slightly lower, the XEL-1 isn't that far behind.

The device features some nice extras in terms of ports as well.  It has an integrated digital TV tuner for Japan, USB, LAN interface, one HDMI port, headphones plug and S-Force sound.

Despite its attractive features, Sony plans to limit its initial production to 2,000 units a month.  In contrast, its LCD TV business sells over 10 million TVs a year.

There is no word from Sony, however, on if and when the display will cross the ocean and reach the U.S. Given that Sony is heralding the XEL-1 as the start of a new sector of its TV business, it is safe to say its OLED displays will soon be coming to the U.S.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ghosting?
By Rotkiv on 10/2/2007 11:15:52 AM , Rating: 2
I am no expert, but would ghosting be a problem?(is it related to response time?)




RE: Ghosting?
By Rovemelt on 10/2/2007 12:06:32 PM , Rating: 3
I was wondering the same thing. I imagine that an OLED pixel turning on/off must happen almost instantaneously compared to how fast we can visually process the event. I imagine the screen must refresh as fast as the electronics that drive the screen.

Anyone know anything else about this?


RE: Ghosting?
By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 10/2/2007 12:50:53 PM , Rating: 1
I think you mean what used to be called "submarining" named after the tendency of a mouse to disappear when dragged across old laptop screens, only to reappear in the new location after a few seconds. Ghosting refers to echos in the video signal, like I have on one of my monitors due to signal bouncing off the pin ends of the extension cables. ANYWAY... this is what the press release says on response times:

5.High animated picture efficiency: It reproduces also the quick movement of sport and the like smoothlyOrganic EL because on & off of the light which comes out of organic layer can be controlled instantaneously, is superior in response efficiency. By the organic EL drive circuit of new development, the image where the movement of sport and the like is quick smooth, it is possible at the same time to express naturally. (Thanks for the translation, Google =)

The claim that it is superior in response efficiency leads me to believe that it is superior to LCD or other mainstream technologies, so ghosting, or submarining, shouldn't be an issue.


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki