backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by jlewis223.. on Oct 10 at 2:52 PM

Intel's Extreme Edition "Yorkfield" processor will launch on November 12; sub-3.0 GHz variants will launch in the first half of January 2008

Intel’s latest roadmap reveals upcoming additions to its desktop processor lineup. Unfortunately, anybody awaiting a straightforward naming convention will need to hold out a bit longer as the processor numbers for desktop Yorkfield and Wolfdale chips complicate the naming situation even further.

The launch of an Extreme Edition version of a chip before mainstream offerings follows Intel’s modus operandi, and as such the rest of the Penryn family will not be seen until the first half of January 2008. The company ambiguously names January 2nd through 20th as the slated launch date for the processors, though companies generally tend to time launch events with trade shows.  The 2008 International Consumer Electronics Show starts on January 7, 2008.

Yorkfield Quad-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB

Model
Core
Frequency
TDP
L2 Cache
Launch Price

QX96503.0 GHz 130W
12MB
$999

Q9950
2.83 GHz 95W
12MB
$530
Q9450
2.66 GHz 95W
12MB
$316
Q9300
2.50 GHz 95W
6MB
$266

The first of the new desktop processors, the quad-core Yorkfield-based QX9650, will be released on November 12 at an expected price of $999. The operating frequency of Intel's highest end 45nm quad-core at launch will be 3.0 GHz.

Desktop Penryn processors will not launch with the 1600 MHz front-side bus.  Intel's halo enthusiast Skulltrail V8 platform uses 1600 MHz workstation processors on a server-class motherboard and chipset.

The Intel Q9550, Q9450 and Q9300 will be the first of the mainstream Yorkfield offerings. At $266, the 45nm 2.50 GHz Q9300 replaces the 65nm 2.4 GHz Q6600.

Wolfdale Dual-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB

Model
Core
Frequency
TDP
L2 Cache
Launch Price

E85003.16 GHz 65W6MB
$266

E84003.00 GHz 65W6MB
$183
E8200
2.66 GHz 65W6MB
N/A


Intel guidance also suggests an intermediate SKU between E8400 and E8200, aptly named the E8300. This processor will eventually replace the 2.83 GHz dual-core processor previously named E8200.  Since the E8300 and E8200 specifications are not set in stone, neither is the final pricing.  Intel's lowest price-point for dual-core 65nm is $163, and it's safe to wager that the E8300 or E8200 will also carry the same pricing.

Before Intel's media-blitz on November 12, the company will silently launch the 65nm 2.4 GHz dual-core E4600 Conroe processor on October 21, 2007.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Q6600 vs Q9300?
By jlewis223 on 10/10/2007 2:52:42 PM , Rating: 2
Hello all. I'm fairly new to overclocking, but it seems that the Q6600 could potentially overclock better than the new Q9300 or the Q9450. While the 45nm chips have better thermal dissapation, because of thier higher 333mhz bus speed, they have lower multipliers than the Q6600, or the Q6700, so you would have to push the bus speed of your MB much higher just to get the same OC with the new chips.

Example:

Q6600 = 266mhz x 9 multiplier
Q6700 = 266mhz x 10 multiplier

Q9300 = 333mhz x 7.5 multiplier ( can you do half step multipliers? )
Q9450 = 333mhz x 8 multiplier

So let's look at getting 3ghz out of a Q6600 vs a Q9450.

Q6600 would have to be a FSB of 333mhz x 9mul. to get 3.0ghz
Q9450 would have to be a FSB of 375mhz x 8mul. to get 3.0ghz

So while the 45nm CPU may run much cooler, alowing for a higher overclock, the poor little northbridge chip on the MB would have to be pushed much higher to get decent overclocks due to the chips lower multipliers. Please, if I am missing something here, feel free to add. As I said I am relatively new to the OC thing, and am trying to figure out if I buy a Q6600 now, or wait for the 45nm stuff.

Thanks!




"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki