Intel Preps 45nm Quad-core Desktop Launch
September 28, 2007 4:44 AM
comment(s) - last by
Intel's Extreme Edition "Yorkfield" processor will launch on November 12; sub-3.0 GHz variants will launch in the first half of January 2008
Intel’s latest roadmap reveals upcoming additions to its desktop processor lineup. Unfortunately, anybody awaiting a straightforward naming convention will need to hold out a bit longer as the processor numbers for desktop
chips complicate the naming situation even further.
The launch of an Extreme Edition version of a chip before mainstream offerings follows Intel’s
, and as such the rest of the
family will not be seen until the first half of January 2008. The company ambiguously names January 2nd through 20th as the slated launch date for the processors, though companies generally tend to time launch events with trade shows. The 2008 International Consumer Electronics Show starts on January 7, 2008.
Quad-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB
The first of the new desktop processors, the quad-core
-based QX9650, will be released on November 12 at an expected price of $999. The operating frequency of Intel's highest end 45nm quad-core at launch will be 3.0 GHz.
processors will not launch with the 1600 MHz front-side bus. Intel's halo
enthusiast Skulltrail V8 platform
uses 1600 MHz workstation processors on a server-class motherboard and chipset.
The Intel Q9550, Q9450 and Q9300 will be the first of the mainstream
offerings. At $266, the 45nm 2.50 GHz Q9300 replaces the 65nm 2.4 GHz Q6600.
Dual-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB
Intel guidance also suggests an intermediate SKU between E8400 and E8200, aptly named the E8300. This processor will eventually replace the 2.83 GHz dual-core processor previously named E8200. Since the E8300 and E8200 specifications are not set in stone, neither is the final pricing. Intel's lowest price-point for dual-core 65nm is $163, and it's safe to wager that the E8300 or E8200 will also carry the same pricing.
Before Intel's media-blitz on November 12, the company will silently launch the 65nm 2.4 GHz dual-core E4600
processor on October 21, 2007.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: AMD is only six months or so behind Intel
9/28/2007 9:45:32 AM
While multi-threaded applications are still few and far between, there is more of a use for dual and quad core processors than many people realize.
There are two factors, the speed of individual applications, and then you have system performance. Even if most applications are single threaded, a multi-core processor will allow the different applications to run on different cores.
So, your anti-virus might sit on one core, other background applications might be spread out on other cores, and the main application you want to run will then have a larger percentage of whatever core it may run on(if it is single-threaded). In the past, with only a single processor core, your anti-virus, background applications, and the main program you want to run were all forced to share the same core. This might leave you with only 80 percent of the CPU resources for the program you really want to run. With dual-core, this might get bumped up to 90 percent available(with a single-threaded program), or higher.
Going to Windows Vista adds a LOT more to what goes on in the background, so everything seems a little slower. So, quad-core would more than balance out the increased operating system demands on the CPU.
If we were in an age of lean and mean operating systems that didn't do much behind the scenes, then dual and quad core processors would be overkill for most people. As time goes on though, it seems that we NEED the extra cores just to handle all the excess garbage that Microsoft puts into their operating systems.
It also takes roughly four to six years for a modern application to be designed from scratch. As a result, the move to multi-threaded application design even if it started when the Athlon 64 X2 and Pentium D first were released would only start showing up at around this time. Most applications are based on previous work as well when it comes to game engines and updated versions of software. So, did Office 2007 start as an all new project, or was it based on Office 2003, which was based on 2001, etc. Since so much of the new versions are based on single-threaded applications from years ago, there is a great chance that the new versions are also only single-threaded.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
Intel Details "Skulltrail" Enthusiasts Platform
April 17, 2007, 12:50 AM
AMD, Zen Processor might power the upcoming Apple MacBook Pro
September 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 - Battery Issue Fixed
August 30, 2016, 6:30 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Best Router for Your Home Network (Under $200.00)
August 6, 2016, 9:51 PM
Most Popular Articles
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Are farm children less likely to have allergies and asthma in adulthood?
Sep 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
MH 17 shot down by missile 'brought from Russia' into Ukraine's rebel territory
Sep 29, 2016, 5:00 PM
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information