backtop


Print 69 comment(s) - last by jlewis223.. on Oct 10 at 2:52 PM

Intel's Extreme Edition "Yorkfield" processor will launch on November 12; sub-3.0 GHz variants will launch in the first half of January 2008

Intel’s latest roadmap reveals upcoming additions to its desktop processor lineup. Unfortunately, anybody awaiting a straightforward naming convention will need to hold out a bit longer as the processor numbers for desktop Yorkfield and Wolfdale chips complicate the naming situation even further.

The launch of an Extreme Edition version of a chip before mainstream offerings follows Intel’s modus operandi, and as such the rest of the Penryn family will not be seen until the first half of January 2008. The company ambiguously names January 2nd through 20th as the slated launch date for the processors, though companies generally tend to time launch events with trade shows.  The 2008 International Consumer Electronics Show starts on January 7, 2008.

Yorkfield Quad-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB

Model
Core
Frequency
TDP
L2 Cache
Launch Price

QX96503.0 GHz 130W
12MB
$999

Q9950
2.83 GHz 95W
12MB
$530
Q9450
2.66 GHz 95W
12MB
$316
Q9300
2.50 GHz 95W
6MB
$266

The first of the new desktop processors, the quad-core Yorkfield-based QX9650, will be released on November 12 at an expected price of $999. The operating frequency of Intel's highest end 45nm quad-core at launch will be 3.0 GHz.

Desktop Penryn processors will not launch with the 1600 MHz front-side bus.  Intel's halo enthusiast Skulltrail V8 platform uses 1600 MHz workstation processors on a server-class motherboard and chipset.

The Intel Q9550, Q9450 and Q9300 will be the first of the mainstream Yorkfield offerings. At $266, the 45nm 2.50 GHz Q9300 replaces the 65nm 2.4 GHz Q6600.

Wolfdale Dual-Core Desktop - 1333 MHz FSB

Model
Core
Frequency
TDP
L2 Cache
Launch Price

E85003.16 GHz 65W6MB
$266

E84003.00 GHz 65W6MB
$183
E8200
2.66 GHz 65W6MB
N/A


Intel guidance also suggests an intermediate SKU between E8400 and E8200, aptly named the E8300. This processor will eventually replace the 2.83 GHz dual-core processor previously named E8200.  Since the E8300 and E8200 specifications are not set in stone, neither is the final pricing.  Intel's lowest price-point for dual-core 65nm is $163, and it's safe to wager that the E8300 or E8200 will also carry the same pricing.

Before Intel's media-blitz on November 12, the company will silently launch the 65nm 2.4 GHz dual-core E4600 Conroe processor on October 21, 2007.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: AMD is only sixTEEN months or so behind Intel
By casket on 9/28/2007 8:37:09 AM , Rating: -1
Intel has taped out on the 32nm... it's coming next August.

Amd has not yet taped out on 45nm...
they are falling farther and farther behind...
1.5 years behind, it looks like.

Intel is on it's second generation quad-core... and AMD hasn't launched their first gen quad-core yet (opteron doesn't count).




By dwo on 9/28/2007 9:50:03 AM , Rating: 5
Nope intel has taped out a test wafer full of some logic circuitry and SRAM cells.

Penryn which is a core shrink of Conroe with some advancements but Nehalem which is the newly reworked core will start off at 45nm and then move to 32nm in 2009. This is otherwise known as intels "tick tock" strategy.

here is the link to prove it. http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070918-inte...


By retrospooty on 9/28/2007 9:59:30 AM , Rating: 2
dwo is right... Nahalem will be on 45nm, not 32. 32nm for Intel is scheduled for Nahalem's successor in 2009.

As far as behind, you can't count manufacturing process anyhow. Intel has alway been 1 generation ahead of AMD. Even when Athlon 64 was kicking P4's but, AMD was 1 generation behind on manufacturing process, due to a superior designed chip.


By retrospooty on 9/28/2007 10:02:49 AM , Rating: 2
/edit, Tha A64 .13 (130nm) micron was faster than the P4 .09 (90nm) due to a superior designed chip.

We need to wait and see the next rev BArcelona and how it benches against Penryn to see how far behind AMD is. Likely pretty close.


RE: AMD is only sixTEEN months or so behind Intel
By dwo on 9/28/2007 10:10:33 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry I guess i worded my post a little wrong nehalem will never be a 32nm part. I believe the first 32nm part is slated to be Sandybridge.


By imperator3733 on 9/28/2007 11:16:57 AM , Rating: 2
No, the first 32nm part is Westmere, which is a shrink of Nehalem. It's comparable to Penryn.


By System48 on 9/28/2007 11:17:27 AM , Rating: 3
Everytime I read Sandybridge I always think of sandy britches.


"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki