Injunctions Against Vonage Affirmed on Appeal
September 26, 2007 4:41 PM
comment(s) - last by
Appeals court affirms injunctions ordered against Vonage in suit brought against it by Verizon
Verizon and Vonage have been duking it out in court for months now in a lawsuit that alleges that Vonage used five Verizon patents in the technology Vonage uses to connect VOIP calls. Vonage fervently denied that it used technology covered in Verizon patents.
Specifically, Vonage maintained that it used third party technology that was already a standard in the industry, yet that didn’t keep
Vonage still lost the initial volley of litigation
. A court found Vonage used Verizon technology in three of the five patents at the heart of the case in March of 2007.
Shortly after the original loss to Verizon,
Vonage issued a statement
saying it would appeal the decision if a stay of the
injunction handed down
against it was not given. The injunction that Vonage feared came true with a judge banning Vonage from signing up new customers, awarding Verizon the sum of $58 million dollars in damages and rights to a 5.5% royalty on future Vonage revenues.
After the initial injunction, Vonage received an
emergency stay of the injunction
from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Today the saga of Vonage versus Verizon continues after the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington upheld the injunction against Vonage.
reports that a third judge issued a dissenting opinion stating the entire ruling and award should have been affirmed. Vonage still maintains that the ruling won’t affect its business because the company stopped using Verizon technology even before the original patent case
Even with the work arounds in place Vonage will still pay approximately $40 million in damages to Verizon.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
9/27/2007 8:26:00 AM
I don't. Verizon has a competing VOIP service as part of its VIOS package. Verizon is completely in the right here.
9/27/2007 9:23:12 AM
I've been "voip'ing" on a dial up connection making international calls (no extra money for you greedy phone companies) with Microsoft NetMeeting in 98-99 by using microphone and speakers connected to a PC, which works on exactly the same principle as VOIP, only without fancy headset.
While I'm not sure about the exact nature of the patent in question, what I'm sure about is that both Verizon and Sprint sued Vonage for the sole reason of eliminating competition. Why would customer pay long distance fees when he can just buy flat rate plan with nationwide calling from one of the numerous VOIP providers such as Vonage? The only reason Comcast/Verizon introduced VOIP is because they were forced to by their competitors, had there not been Vonage you still would be stuck with POTS and astronomical long distance rates. It's sad to see small startups who truly push the industry to be forced to close by the big guys protecting their monopoly.
9/27/2007 12:43:42 PM
Exactly, it's all a money gain. What better way to make money than to hold a monopoly? It's interesting that the Communication companies here in America have such free reign of things while a Software company (micorsoft) is sued out the ass for doing essentially the same thing "supplying a product that works good enough for the majority of people and make sure that it is compatible enough for everyone to use but charge and arm and a leg, holding an effective monopoly over that given products market so that any other competitive company trying to offer something to it's consumer is so far behind that consumers don't want to switch."
Speaking of a monopoly....can a person or town sue/charge a company for having a monopoly in just a certain area, and not over the whole country?
"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
Relief for Vonage Allows New Customer Sign-Ups Again
April 9, 2007, 3:03 AM
Judge Imposes Injunction Blocking Vonage from New Signups
April 6, 2007, 12:52 PM
Vonage Responds to Verizon's Victory
March 27, 2007, 9:27 PM
Vonage Loses Patent Infringment Case to Verizon, Subscribers Sinking
March 24, 2007, 7:51 PM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information