Apple May "Unintentionally" Kill Unlocked iPhones with Update
September 25, 2007 2:34 PM
comment(s) - last by
The iPhone update question ... unlocked users will probably want to click "Cancel" for lack of a "Hell, NO!" option.
(Source: Gizmodo, Brian Lam)
Apple warns users that their unlocked iPhones may not work after new software update
Apple recently announced that its new update will likely kill iPhones that have been unlocked to work on to networks other than AT&T, rendering them completely inoperable.
In a statement released by the company earlier this week, the company stated: "Apple has discovered that many of the unauthorized iPhone unlocking programs available on the Internet cause irreparable damage to the iPhone's software, which will likely result in the modified iPhone becoming permanently inoperable when a future Apple-supplied iPhone software update is installed."
This statement was immediately followed by Apple's announcement that unlocking the iPhone will result in a voided warranty.
"This has nothing to do with proactively disabling a phone that is unlocked or hacked," Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, said
in an interview with
The Associated Press
. "It's unfortunate that some of these programs have caused damage to the iPhone software, but Apple cannot be responsible for ... those consequences."
Last week Steve Jobs had
the unlocked iPhones, saying Apple would fight against them. "It's a constant cat and mouse game," he stated.
There are currently many free and paid unlocking programs,
John McLaughlin of
, a company out of Ireland that has developed unlocking software, thinks Apple's claim that unlocking software made harmful irreversible changes is fabricated.
"We have reviewed the source code of a number of these applications and to the best of our knowledge any changes made to the software can easily be reversed," McLaughlin said in an e-mail. "After unlocking the iPhone, minimal effort is required to get it in to its previously locked state."
Apple has sold over 1 million iPhones
There is no word on how many unlocked iPhones are "in the wild," operating on T-Mobile's compatible network or other compatible networks worldwide.
The update's includes the software that will allow the iPhone to access iTunes wirelessly and the Starbucks promotional software, among other updates.
Apple's move may be illegal
according to legal experts
. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act forbids manufacturers from voiding the warranty of a product unless they can prove that the user damaged the product. Whether Apple's moves are legal depends on whether they can prove in court (as they likely will) that the unlocking software caused irreversible damage to the iPhone's software or hardware.
Many iPhone users will likely find this development alarming. The solution is simply not to update their iPhones, but many will be displeased that they cannot get the same priveleges as other users -- such as WiFi iTunes. The legality of the move is debatable, but Apple seems firmly resolved to try to stamp out unlocked iPhones.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Apple FUD
9/25/2007 4:34:49 PM
BTW, I'm not referring to the disabling of Iphones that have been unlocked. They're fully in their rights to do so, just like Sony with the PSP. What I'm commenting on is the blame-shifting, claiming people are breaking the IPhone by unlocking it. It's BULL #$@#$@, and yet they're all holy and claming to be blameless in the matter.
I can just see steve jobs in a white robe and a halo over his head.
RE: Apple FUD
9/25/2007 6:10:40 PM
Actually, no, they are not in their rights. Once something is bought by a consumer, to suddenly 'brick' that thing with an update (and I believe that if it happens it will have been INTENTIONAL) is destruction of private property, and they are not within their rights to do that, not in the least.
RE: Apple FUD
9/25/2007 8:20:34 PM
i'd understand if they'd disable the phone features (after all they make big money on those contract fees), but to brick the whole thing is kinda heavy. there is no way that that would be an unintentional side-effect of a little update.
i'm glad i'm not an apple customer.
“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Free iPhone Unlocking Software Released Into The Wild
September 11, 2007, 8:32 PM
iPhone Tops One Million Mark
September 10, 2007, 11:24 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information