backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 12 comment(s) - last by smitty3268.. on Sep 25 at 11:42 PM

Steve Jobs will be grilled by the SEC

Surprise, surprise.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) subpoenaed Apple's Steve Jobs.  Jobs will be required to deliver a deposition regarding the SEC’s stock-options backdating case against former Apple General Counsel, Nancy Heinen.  Giving a deposition does not directly incriminate Jobs himself, rather is a recorded  testimony given under oath in a court for future use in trial.   

The company was officially cleared of any wrongdoing by the SEC in April, however, individual civil cases were brought against Heinen as well as former Chief Financial Officer, Fred Anderson.  Quick to settle out of court, Anderson agreed to pay a $150,000 fine and forfeit $3.5 million in profits gained from the options in question.

Last year it seemed possible Jobs would face legal problems after it was revealed that he received 7.5 million shares of unauthorized back-dated options in 2001.  The options originally appeared to have been approved in the now infamous October 2001 board meeting that in reality never took place.  Jobs however was given the support of Apple’s board of directors and ultimately cleared by what the company called an “independent investigation” of “outside directors.”

The SEC now appears to agree with Apple concerning Jobs and is instead focused on his long time associate Nancy Heinen.  Heinen’s work with Jobs as company general counsel had spanned over a decade and two businesses.  She is accused of having falsified record of the October meeting and later manipulating company records to cover her actions.  

Although Apple's stock was down it still outperformed the NASDAQ on a day dominated by headlines involving the backdating scandal.  Perhaps it is that investors are beginning to feel Apple’s CEO may be finally steering clear of the stock-options hazard. 

In a recent Bloomberg interview, SEC lawyer Jahan Rasai stated it is uncommon for the SEC to add executives to an investigation this far developed.  Steve Jobs is wildly popular amongst Apple investors and rumors of his departure due to this scandal have been credited with fueling volatility in this high beta stock over the past fiscal year. 


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Something Smells Bad
By TomZ on 9/24/2007 2:10:59 PM , Rating: 2
Doesn't it seem odd that Jobs' assistant took the fall, even though Jobs himself financially benefitted from the transaction? Why would she, an attorney herself, take a risk like that for Jobs' benefit? It just doesn't make sense - something smells bad with this situation.

And what a big surprise that Apple's board cleared Jobs of any involvement. After all, they are really impartial, LOL.




RE: Something Smells Bad
By James Holden on 9/24/2007 2:17:39 PM , Rating: 2
I'd take a 7-figure check from Steve to do 6 months in white-collar prison any day.


RE: Something Smells Bad
By TheGreek on 9/24/07, Rating: 0
RE: Something Smells Bad
By 16nm on 9/24/2007 3:24:17 PM , Rating: 2
Being an attorney, would she not also lose her ability to practice law? There are lots of good attorneys with more than 1,000,000 dollars that they earned *legally*. Not that this proves anything. It's just interesting.


RE: Something Smells Bad
By Eris23007 on 9/24/2007 6:04:53 PM , Rating: 2
I hear they have conjugal visits there! We should BE so luck!
<pause>
But... are you sure this crime wouldn't instead lead to Federal "pound-me-in-the-ass" prison?


RE: Something Smells Bad
By Eris23007 on 9/24/2007 6:07:06 PM , Rating: 2
"Hey, Peter-man.... watch out for your cornhole, buddy."

F**kin-A, man.

/I'd still probably take the $$$
//That should be "lucky"... -1 for missed error :-(
///Office Space FTW!


RE: Something Smells Bad
By Andrew Campbell (blog) on 9/24/2007 3:56:08 PM , Rating: 3
I should make it clear that Jobs did not directly benefit from the back-dated options in question. He forfeited them in March 2003 and their place the b.o.d. granted him five million shares of restricted stock. The shares were valued at $646.6 million at the time.


RE: Something Smells Bad
By TomZ on 9/24/2007 5:18:41 PM , Rating: 2
Thanks, that's helpful to know. I hadn't heard that information before.


RE: Something Smells Bad
By rdeegvainl on 9/24/2007 7:00:17 PM , Rating: 2
DEAR LORD, i have no clue how this stock options and backdating thing works, or what the deal with all this is, is there anyone who can simplify it, or is it gonna be confusing and convoluted no matter what?


RE: Something Smells Bad
By smitty3268 on 9/24/2007 11:25:54 PM , Rating: 2
Backdating means you are retroactively given the stock at the best possible time, even though it wasn't actually when it was given to you.

So say someone is given a certain amount of stock - say $1,000,000 worth. Each share is worth $100, so that works out to 10,000 shares. Wait a couple years and the value is up 20%, and you've got 1,200,000 in 10,000 shares. So what's backdating? Today I say, I actually got those shares 3 months earlier than I really did. Back then the stock was lower, so $1,000,000 / $50 per share = 20,000 shares. So today I actually have $2,400,000 in my 20,000 shares.


RE: Something Smells Bad
By rdeegvainl on 9/25/2007 6:57:42 AM , Rating: 2
So it's like being given a certain dollar amount and then given a time frame from the past to choose your price. Where do these stocks come from, they just create them? or do they have a stockpile (forgive the pun) or do they force people to sell stock?


RE: Something Smells Bad
By smitty3268 on 9/25/2007 11:42:44 PM , Rating: 2
I really don't know that much about the subject, but I think stock options are just newly created. Since the amount created is very little compared to the total amount already on the market it doesn't affect share prices.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

















botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki