Apple Locks New iPods to iTunes
September 16, 2007 2:19 PM
comment(s) - last by
New code added to iTunes database file prevents iPods from being used with any program other than iTunes.
Less than two weeks ago
its entire iPod lineup along with introducing a new iPod model, the iPod touch. The product line update consisted of new features and designs for Apple’s iPod brand. The update, though, shouldn’t be taken entirely at face value; Apple also managed to
some code that locks the new iPods to only work with iTunes.
Apple has locked out other digital content management software by adding “SHA1 hashes” to the beginning of the iTunesDB file, the database file which keeps track of digital content stored on the iPods. The enhanced code locks the iTunes database to one specific iPod and also prevents any modifications to it. If an attempt is made to either change the database file to a different iPod or to modify the file, the iPod reports “0 songs” are stored on the device. What this means is that essentially only iTunes can add or delete content from the iPod.
The most plausible reason for locking then new iPods to iTunes is that Apple is becoming conscious of the growing threat that other music services are offering. Since many music labels are
, it is now easier than ever for music services like Rhapsody to load non-DRM music directly to iPods through its own player; meaning iTunes is taken out of the picture as the digital content handler for iPods.
Locking iPods to iTunes effectively inhibits other media players from handling content for iPods. This move also prevents other music services from truly competing with the iTunes store and maintains Apple’s dominance.
Apple has been very aggressive in the past to ensure that nothing changes the relationship between iPods and iTunes. Three years ago RealNetworks attempted to create an alliance between Apple and RealNetwork that would allow Real to license Apple’s Fairplay DRM technology so that it could sell files compatible with iPods.
Real’s ambitions turned out to be a failure when its talks with Apple failed, and so the company decided to simply reverse engineer Apple's FairPlay to create Harmony technology, which allowed music sold via RealNetworks to work on Apple’s iPods along with a plethora of other portable devices.
Apple nearly immediately issued a scathing response, and stated that Real’s move violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Apple also issued a firmware update to its iPods which blocked iPod access to Harmony files. At the time Apple said it was “stunned” by RealNetwork’s moves and accused it of using "tactics and ethics of a hacker."
Do you have an iPod but run Linux? Tough luck says Apple. Windows users who prefer to use other management tools, such as Winamp, will also need to use iTunes exclusively for now as well.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
9/16/2007 10:40:19 PM
For me iTunes is the perfect solution to organize my music collection. I started using it even without having an iPod. Once I got to know the software better I wanted a music player that is well integrated with it so I decided to buy an iPod later. In the same time I've never purchased anything from iTunes music store but I usually buy CDs and grab them.
I have a lot of experience with other solutions too but iTunes proved to be the most convenient so far. Although I can understand if someone doesn't like it as much as I do, I just don't get the hatred some people express against it.
Come on, it is just one of the solutions on the market. If you don't like it, use another one. Don't like the iPod and the attached infrastructure? Do you know any better? Go ahead and buy something else.
9/16/2007 11:07:46 PM
That definitely wants to make me check out Itunes because managing an expansive music collection can be cumbersome. Though, I have to say Windows Explorer pretty much gives me all the control I need.
As for you're curiosity as to why people seem to hate Itunes so much. I can't speak for everyone and every situation, but I believe, and especially in this case, it's the fact that you are being told you HAVE to use it. Again, people want a true plug and play PMP experience. Also, people want devices that support a broad array of codecs and media types. Electronics should not force one to use a proprietary file format, program, or company. They should work with everything they can with in reason to "enhance the product experience," or some marketing bullshit like that.
Archos products seem to do this more and more.
"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch
Apple Announces New iPods
September 5, 2007, 2:38 PM
iTunes Now Offering DRM-Free Music Tracks for $1.29
May 30, 2007, 12:12 PM
Google plans ultra-fast wireless Internet for Research Triangle Park, N.C.
August 12, 2016, 6:30 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Most Popular Articles
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information