"Plaintiff here must present at least some facts to
show the plausibility of their allegations of copyright infringement against
other than the bare conclusory statement that on “information and belief”
defendant has downloaded, distributed and/or made available for distribution to
the public copyrighted works, plaintiffs have presented no facts that would
indicate this allegation is anything more than speculation.
complaint is simply a boilerplate listing of the elements of copyright
infringement without any facts pertaining specifically to the instant
therefore finds that the complaint fails to sufficiently state a claim upon
which relief can be granted and entry of default judgment is not
quote: If conditions are similar, I don't see how other judges can make a different decision. Won't I just cite what happend here, which constitutes basically lack of evidence?