UC Davis Discovers Inner Workings of China Firewall
September 17, 2007 1:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
Researchers helped provide a rare glimpse into how the great Chinese firewall really works
According to researchers from the University of New Mexico and University of California, Davis, the firewall used by the Chinese government to censor Internet material is not really as secure as the government wants users to believe. Researchers discovered that much objectionable content could still be viewed, especially if online traffic was high.
Instead of simply blocking all web sites that feature content on a banned subjects, the
Chinese government chooses to use a large dragnet
that looks for the use of banned words. If the Chinese system detects any banned words, reset commands are sent to the source and destination of the banned word. Researchers found that the "'resets' effectively break the connection" so results will not be returned.
This different type of filter ultimately encourages a certain level of self-censorship - since Chinese users know that selected words are taboo, the users may choose to avoid the topics altogether.
"Imagine you want to remove the history of the Wounded Knee massacre from the Library of Congress," said Jed Crandall, University of California, Davis assistant professor of computer science. "You could remove 'Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee' and a few other selected books, or you could remove every book in the entire library that contains the word 'massacre.'"
Both universities who took part in the study are now collaborating to work on ConceptDoppler, a tool that is able to give researchers a report if censorship in China changes.
Internet censorship in China runs rampant, with a number of popular web sites not available to traditional Internet users. The Flickr photo sharing web site successfully loads, but users are greeted with a screen without images. Several different popular online blogging services also cannot be used by Chinese users.
The Great Firewall of China web site allows users to test if a specific URL is blocked by the Chinese firewall.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 5:16:20 PM
How many people did the Maoist revolution kill? How many were killed during the Cultural revolution? How many were killed in Tiananmen Square?
And the Communist Party runs China. There are no opposition parties. Not because they are so happy and filled with the fulfilled joy of socialism. No because the government will not allow it. I don't know what you would call it but I call a government like that a doctorial regime.
Swedes, Swiss, Canadians and all of the rest of the neo-socialist democracies are fully free to change their governments and to travel, assemble and speak as they wish. Not the Chinese.
The status of China in the world today. Easy. The most dangerous regime in Asia. With over a billion oppressed citizens. Devoid of even the most basic human rights. No free speech, no free assembly, no right to self determination. Need I go on?
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 7:22:57 PM
Just to be clear socialism != communism. One is a form of government and the other is a economic system. In the US we often mistakenly use the two interchangably, but they are not the same thing.
China is not exactly Marxist communist country, but neither was the USSR. For that matter the US isn't exactly a Jeffersonian democracy.
In most western countries we talk about capitalism and socialism, but in every case its actually some blend in between the two.
One of my favorite quotes from JFK is that "Democracy may not be perfect, but we've never had to build a wall to keep our people in." He was talking about the Berlin wall in Germany, but I'd say it applies to China's firewall just as well.
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 10:43:49 PM
I assume you realize how little the "Communist Party" has in common with Communism at the moment. In case you haven't followed it at all recently, as far as rule it's effectively authoritarian, whereas most of its economic policies are closer to capitalistic than anything else. Hell, you don't even have to be a communist to join the party these days.
So yes, China's pretty fucked up. But that has little if anything to do with socialism in itself. As the European examples show rather well. But I think most of us knew that already.
"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs
Tim Berners-Lee Talks Free and Open Web on Its 25th Birthday
March 12, 2014, 9:33 AM
"Bitcoin COO" Explains Bitcoin to Conan O'Brien in Layman's Terms
March 11, 2014, 9:53 AM
Comcast Paying Millions to Congress to Solidify Time Warner Cable Acquisition
March 10, 2014, 8:25 PM
AT&T Cuts Price of 2GB Shared Data Plan, T-Mobile Ups Cost of Unlimited Option
March 10, 2014, 2:51 PM
Sprint Chairman Says Carrier Still Interested in T-Mobile Purchase
March 10, 2014, 2:11 PM
Vine Users No Longer Allowed to Post Pornographic Videos
March 7, 2014, 1:47 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Bitcoin King: Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès' History of Arrests, Firings
March 5, 2014, 9:05 AM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Apple Won't Let UK Sons Unlock Their Deceased Mother's iPad
March 6, 2014, 12:44 PM
Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014, 9:45 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information