UC Davis Discovers Inner Workings of China Firewall
September 17, 2007 1:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
Researchers helped provide a rare glimpse into how the great Chinese firewall really works
According to researchers from the University of New Mexico and University of California, Davis, the firewall used by the Chinese government to censor Internet material is not really as secure as the government wants users to believe. Researchers discovered that much objectionable content could still be viewed, especially if online traffic was high.
Instead of simply blocking all web sites that feature content on a banned subjects, the
Chinese government chooses to use a large dragnet
that looks for the use of banned words. If the Chinese system detects any banned words, reset commands are sent to the source and destination of the banned word. Researchers found that the "'resets' effectively break the connection" so results will not be returned.
This different type of filter ultimately encourages a certain level of self-censorship - since Chinese users know that selected words are taboo, the users may choose to avoid the topics altogether.
"Imagine you want to remove the history of the Wounded Knee massacre from the Library of Congress," said Jed Crandall, University of California, Davis assistant professor of computer science. "You could remove 'Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee' and a few other selected books, or you could remove every book in the entire library that contains the word 'massacre.'"
Both universities who took part in the study are now collaborating to work on ConceptDoppler, a tool that is able to give researchers a report if censorship in China changes.
Internet censorship in China runs rampant, with a number of popular web sites not available to traditional Internet users. The Flickr photo sharing web site successfully loads, but users are greeted with a screen without images. Several different popular online blogging services also cannot be used by Chinese users.
The Great Firewall of China web site allows users to test if a specific URL is blocked by the Chinese firewall.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 5:16:20 PM
How many people did the Maoist revolution kill? How many were killed during the Cultural revolution? How many were killed in Tiananmen Square?
And the Communist Party runs China. There are no opposition parties. Not because they are so happy and filled with the fulfilled joy of socialism. No because the government will not allow it. I don't know what you would call it but I call a government like that a doctorial regime.
Swedes, Swiss, Canadians and all of the rest of the neo-socialist democracies are fully free to change their governments and to travel, assemble and speak as they wish. Not the Chinese.
The status of China in the world today. Easy. The most dangerous regime in Asia. With over a billion oppressed citizens. Devoid of even the most basic human rights. No free speech, no free assembly, no right to self determination. Need I go on?
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 7:22:57 PM
Just to be clear socialism != communism. One is a form of government and the other is a economic system. In the US we often mistakenly use the two interchangably, but they are not the same thing.
China is not exactly Marxist communist country, but neither was the USSR. For that matter the US isn't exactly a Jeffersonian democracy.
In most western countries we talk about capitalism and socialism, but in every case its actually some blend in between the two.
One of my favorite quotes from JFK is that "Democracy may not be perfect, but we've never had to build a wall to keep our people in." He was talking about the Berlin wall in Germany, but I'd say it applies to China's firewall just as well.
RE: Freedom of speech
9/17/2007 10:43:49 PM
I assume you realize how little the "Communist Party" has in common with Communism at the moment. In case you haven't followed it at all recently, as far as rule it's effectively authoritarian, whereas most of its economic policies are closer to capitalistic than anything else. Hell, you don't even have to be a communist to join the party these days.
So yes, China's pretty fucked up. But that has little if anything to do with socialism in itself. As the European examples show rather well. But I think most of us knew that already.
"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Most Popular Articles
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
Jumbo Joust: iPad Pro vs. Surface Pro 3 vs. Surface Pro 4
November 11, 2015, 1:00 AM
BlackBerry Priv is an Amazing Android So Secure You May Never Hear of It
November 2, 2015, 2:46 PM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information