backtop


Print 90 comment(s) - last by psyph3r.. on Aug 30 at 8:13 PM

Nintendo tops both handheld and home gaming market with DS, Wii

The Wii is officially more than just a gaming sensation. Nintendo’s latest console has captured the hearts, minds and dollars of not only gaming fans, but also the elderly, vacationers, the health-conscious and other casual markets.

Despite being released a year later than Microsoft’s current generation console offering, the Nintendo Wii has surpassed the Xbox 360 in total worldwide hardware sales, according to the latest data from VGchartz.com.

By the week ending August 23, VGchartz gathered that Nintendo had sold 10.57 million Wii consoles over lifetime, while Microsoft sold 10.51 million Xbox 360 consoles. In order to eclipse the Xbox 360 in less than a year since release, the Wii had outsold Microsoft’s game system by a margin of 2.3-to-1 worldwide.

A key factor in Wii’s quick pace in catching the Xbox 360 the acceptance of Nintendo’s console in Japan. The Wii sold 3.46 million units in Japan, while the Xbox 360 sold only 0.43 million in the same region.

While typical sales numbers from the game companies relate to shipments to retailers rather than sold-to-consumers, VGchartz claims that it tracks its data based on actual consumer sell-through figures.

The popularity of the Wii, along with the DS handheld, have helped Nintendo rocket past its competitors. The Wii was outselling the PS3 by a margin of 6-to-1 in June, helping Nintendo overtake Sony in market value. In fact, Nintendo’s recent success has put it ahead of both NTT and Honda, making it the fifth largest company in Japan.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Games?
By randomname on 8/24/2007 6:09:54 AM , Rating: 3
"The cell processor was specifically designed for the maximum possible computational efficiency, sacrificing the ability to use simple program code (by design!)."

I would say that the Cell was designed for maximal (parallel) floating point power, which is very good for scientific computation, or streaming media. However, for game code (excluding graphics and physics) which requires more integer power and serial processing performance, it is probably more of a miss. The reasons for this are mostly related to the original vision for the Cell. Originally it was supposed to handle the graphics on the PS3, after which Sony/Toshiba tried to develop their own GPU, and finally Sony brought in NVidia. (Of course, you will not get such an official account of the history of Cell/PS3 from Sony/Toshiba/IBM.)

From Dean Takahashi's ebook 'The Xbox 360 Uncloaked':
"But no one knew that inside Sony, something was going terribly wrong. Sony had created a new game system, dubbed GS Cube, with 16 Emotion Engine chips. It proved to be a technological dead end. In parallel, IBM fellow Jim Kahle had proposed Cell, a radically different computing architecture. Instead of a microprocessor and a graphics chip, the system for the PlayStation 3 was originally supposed to have two Cell microprocessors. One would handle the system while the second one would handle graphics. The game developers couldn’t make heads or tails of this non-traditional architecture. Sony scrapped that plan. Then it commissioned both Sony’s and Toshiba’s chip designers to create their own graphics chip. The graphics chip was going to be a screaming monster that relied totally on one kind of processing, dubbed fill rate, to handle the graphics. That was what Sony and Toshiba’s engineers knew how to create, based on their work on the PlayStation 2. But in the meantime, both ATI and Nvidia had pioneered the use of shaders, which were subprograms that added the nuance and texture to the surface of an object. This technique simplified the process of creating art for games. To create a new effect, the developer had to simply create a new shader. The Sony and Toshiba team were far behind on shader technology. Game developers once again objected to the solution that they were proposing. Sony had to cancel the graphics chip altogether. The console just wasn’t going to launch in 2005."


RE: Games?
By encryptkeeper on 8/24/2007 1:32:09 PM , Rating: 2
In parallel, IBM fellow Jim Kahle had proposed Cell, a radically different computing architecture. Instead of a microprocessor and a graphics chip, the system for the PlayStation 3 was originally supposed to have two Cell microprocessors. One would handle the system while the second one would handle graphics.

I can definitely see the idea behind this from a business standpoint. Creating twice as many Cell procs would cost probably the same in materials, but you would save money in the long run because you wouldn't have one facility that was creating Cell processors and one that was making graphics chips. That's why Intel fabs are so efficient, all the cores are the same except the quads. Some pass high stress tests and become core 2 duos, and some pass only low tests and become Celerons.


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki