backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 24 comment(s) - last by BryceCanyon.. on Mar 3 at 2:03 PM


Terrafugia Transition Personal Air Vehicle
Meet George Jetson

Most of us think of practical flying cars as something of science fiction or at least something that is many years down the road from now. Well, if 28 year old MIT student Carl Dietrich has anything to say about it, dreams of a modern day flying car may be within reach by the year 2009. Dietrich’s design for a Personal Air Vehicle won the prestigious $30,000 Lemelson-MIT Student Prize.

Dietrich along with Samuel Schweighart and Anna Mracek invision a vehicle that would be able to cruise at 120 MPH at an altitude of between 3,500 to 8,000 feet.

The Transition would weigh 1,320 pounds, feature a 100-horsepower engine, stand 6 1/2 feet tall, and be 80 inches wide. ''If you can fit a Cadillac Escalade in your garage, you can fit this," said Dietrich. Schweighart, an MIT graduate who now works at Draper Laboratory in Cambridge, adds that the Transition will be best understood as a ''drivable airplane." Their hope is that it will fit into the new FAA category of light sport aircraft and would take off from airports rather than lifting off from a driveway or roadway.

Can these three succeed where other designs like the Moller Skycar have failed in providing a marketable flying car? The plane would take off from traditional airports instead of performing vertical lift-off from your driveway or work parking lot so FAA certification shouldn't be too much of a problem for the design. But there are still more hurdles to overcome and the team has three years to work them out if their 2009 production date holds firm.

More here.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

File this one under "jet packs" ;-)
By Enoch2001 on 2/17/2006 12:07:41 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The Transition is a Personal Air Vehicle (PAV) designed to make general aviation more practical for personal transportation.


Pffftt - tell the FAA that. Seriously, would anyone want just anyone flying around in this? Takes a helluva lot of training and practice to be a safe pilot, and the "friendly skies" are congested enough as it is.

Like the skycars of the 60's this is a flawed concept that will always be relugated to be toys for the rich.





RE: File this one under "jet packs" ;-)
By codeThug on 2/17/2006 12:11:35 AM , Rating: 2
No kidding...

All the rich boy lawyers and dentists are cr


By codeThug on 2/17/2006 12:12:51 AM , Rating: 2
ashing their aircraft in record numbers these days.


RE: File this one under "jet packs" ;-)
By feraltoad on 2/17/2006 12:35:34 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah ur right. This is the modern day version of lashing canvas "wings" to your arms and jumping off the barn. Would you want your kids in that thing. Potential Energy=Kinetic Energy=Danger! We won't see flight like this until we get away from internal combustion and move to sum new fangled energy source and by then we will have destroyed everything lol.


By Xenoterranos on 2/17/2006 12:58:13 AM , Rating: 2
Hrmm...A jetpack would probably be the BEST way to go. If you're drunk or stupid, there's only one passenger to kill (you). And whn you crash, your total mass is much lower that if you were driving even this thing (which weighs roughly the same as a horse). So, i'd rather have a fat man than a horse crash into my house, thank you very much.

Viva Le Jetpack!


RE: File this one under "jet packs" ;-)
By Decaydence on 2/17/2006 1:38:46 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Seriously, would anyone want just anyone flying around in this? Takes a helluva lot of training and practice to be a safe pilot, and the "friendly skies" are congested enough as it is.


When in the air, it would obviously be treated just as any other plane, meaning the pilot would have to have the same training required in order to go up in current aircraft. While this certainly will never be considered mainstream, for the people who would like to train to become pilots, pay the money for a crazy looking car/plane hybrind, and ignore the fact that buying this is only saving them from having to get a rental car on the other side of the trip, I say have at it. Besides, I would rather John Q. Average fly around in this little thing than continue living in fear that John Travolta will drop out of the sky any minute in a commercial air liner and take out my neighborhood.


By abhaxus on 2/17/2006 1:42:14 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
esides, I would rather John Q. Average fly around in this little thing than continue living in fear that John Travolta will drop out of the sky any minute in a commercial air liner and take out my neighborhood.


i cannot comment on the rest of the posts. but this was the funniest thing ive read all night. congrats.


By mpeny on 2/17/2006 9:29:43 AM , Rating: 2
Uhm I'm sure the automobile got the same kind of resistence in the late 19th century early 20th century.

gg


By BryceCanyon on 3/3/2006 2:03:55 PM , Rating: 2
WOW! Good thing John Denver is not around any more, so he could twiddle with his fuel valve on his flying car, and plummet to his death, and the death of possibly 100's of others. Which also brings to mind the idiot looser morons that tend to ignore the Low Fuel light, and take off anyway. Don't think Triple A will be making many trips to the airways to deliver that desparately needed can of gas...



Back to the Future - Delorean style
By Jackyl on 2/17/2006 1:12:43 AM , Rating: 3
This just looks like a damn single engine plane and uses conventional engines. What we need is a [b]new propulsion system[/b], aka. Anti-Gravity.

There are so many scientists in the world today, yet NONE have developed a new propulsion system? This is very [b]hard to believe[/b] in today's time. The government needs to stop suppressing and hiding technology from the public.




RE: Back to the Future - Delorean style
By phaxmohdem on 2/17/06, Rating: -1
RE: Back to the Future - Delorean style
By tuteja1986 on 2/17/2006 2:30:29 AM , Rating: 2
lol .. I will not fly/drive a car like that


By sieistganzfett on 2/17/2006 8:36:41 AM , Rating: 2
lol. i want one, if i cant find parking at college i'll just park it on the roof of the building i have to go to, to bad it needs runway space, but im sure i can alter it for vertical lift off somehow to get this to work.


By theslug on 2/17/2006 8:39:47 AM , Rating: 2
Agreed..I don't like the fact that it has wings. Wake me up when someone invents hover technology.


Automation needed
By TheCurlyBoy on 2/17/2006 8:59:17 AM , Rating: 2
Until they're able to automate the flying/landing/launching of these things, there's no way in heck they should ever be produced. We have a hard enough time handling the air traffic that exists now. Without some seriously high amount of automation, giving flight to the masses means you have to figure out a way for airports to go from the 3000 flights a day they currently handle to potentially 3000 every few seconds during rush hours. For some reason, I have my doubts that such a thing will be possible if you leave things under human control.




RE: Automation needed
By Eris23007 on 2/17/2006 3:43:16 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Until they're able to automate the flying/landing/launching of these things, there's no way in heck they should ever be produced.


They already automate takeoff & landing of large commercial aircraft... why not these?


Is it just me
By bunnyfubbles on 2/17/2006 10:51:10 AM , Rating: 2
Or does the skycar kick the crap out of this design?

Seriously, flawed or not the skycar concept is heads and tails better. Vertical take off, over twice the cruising speed, actually compact - the wings on this pos are really a downer.

No, this just looks like a goofy airplane and an even worse car.




RE: Is it just me
By ktlewis02 on 2/17/2006 11:43:54 AM , Rating: 2
Is it just me.. or is the skycar the biggest joke and/or sham one has ever seen?


Flying Car Concept?
By GhandiInstinct on 2/17/2006 12:57:42 AM , Rating: 1
More like flying airplane passenger jet concept, or FAPJC.

This is not impressive, sci-fi still owns real life.




RE: Flying Car Concept?
By boredstudent on 2/17/2006 4:45:32 PM , Rating: 2
The only time this would ever not be the case is if people stopped having imaginations and free thought. That's why the second part of 'sci-fi' is 'fiction'.


By aguilpa1 on 2/17/2006 9:36:08 AM , Rating: 2
it still looks like just a plane...with little tires? Where is the design that has not wings and hoovers in the air.




By lamestlamer on 2/17/2006 12:50:28 PM , Rating: 2
The thing is 80 inches wide and 6.5' tall, so it must have folding wings. I wonder what the capacity of this little thing is. With modern day GPS technology, we could easily automate every plane between takeoff and landing: and perhaps even takeoff and landing as well. The main issue is that every single plane would need electronic controls compatible with a unified standard, and that is about as likely as a public shift to HDTV.




This is a little different
By Plasmoid on 2/17/2006 3:11:17 PM , Rating: 2
Sure i'd love to take one of those things up for a spin... just like i'd like to take ordinary car for a whizz around a racing circuit.

What important is i got a big wall between me and the road outside my house... and im alright with cars. I wont remain alright about those if they start leaving craters in my roof though... unless of course it was my own plane-car, then that would be fine.




Mmmm...
By SubKamran on 2/18/2006 12:13:06 AM , Rating: 2
Er, why do these people insist on believing we're going to have flying aircraft. No one's going to want to, because cars are hard enough to drive by themselves. A highway is much different than open air. What do these people expect? 100 aircraft in a mile-wide space? That won't work.

No, hover cars are practical, sky-flying cars will never work. And this is quite different from saying automobiles won't work 20 years ago. We're on land, cars are on land, thus you can build a road. It'd be too cost prohibitive to build "sky highways." And god forbid you're gonna let people free-fly around.

Sorry, cool idea, but it won't take off. (Pun intended)




"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments









botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki