backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by JasonMick.. on Aug 13 at 1:53 PM

A French minor arrested for taking "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows" translation into his own hands

Before the release of the seventh and final installment of the Harry Potter series, the frenzy for die hard fans to acquire the 759 page novel became more intense than ever before.  But not everyone could have the pleasure of holding the literature gold in their hands on launch day.  A 16-year-old boy in France found himself locked up for taking the French translation delay into his own hands.

The unnamed French 16-year-old translated the entire book in a matter of days and posted in online for public view.  The authorized publisher of the French translation, Gallimard Jeunsesse, is said to have taken up to several months to release a copy, only because he was not able to get his hands on the English version until the day of its release.  

The Aix-en-Provence native's impatience does not appear before the firing squad alone. The authorized translator of the seventh Harry Potter book in China publically announced that freelance translators delete their versions.  Also, a Spanish translation was released early by eager superfans in Chile. 


J.K. Rowling and Gallimard filed an official complaint, reports Reuters.

"This complaint in no way concerns isolated translations published on the Internet ... by disinterested fans not fully aware of the illegal nature of their action," said Gallimard spokeswoman, Marie Leroy-Lena, in a statement.

According to Leroy-Lena, Rowling nor Gallimard were not involved with the case and had not filed for damages.  The boy was released not too much later after his arrest.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Err
By A5un on 8/10/2007 3:37:57 PM , Rating: -1
Whatever, the 7th book was horrible anyways.




RE: Err
By omnicronx on 8/10/2007 3:53:39 PM , Rating: 1
How old are you?


RE: Err
By A5un on 8/10/07, Rating: -1
RE: Err
By Rampage on 8/10/2007 5:24:42 PM , Rating: 2
I think his point was that this book series was originally meant for a younger audience than you. Clearly its become a modern phenomenon but it is indeed at its core, intended for young children.

Since you are 21, I think his point was well made.. but it went right over your head. Perhaps you do have the perception and intuition of a young child after all?
Thus making your assessment of the book valid and credible.


RE: Err
By A5un on 8/10/2007 6:14:07 PM , Rating: 2
Yea I'll agree with you that it was originally intented for a younger audience. But I think she wrote in such a way that the book grew with the reader too. I started reading, er, I don't know how many years ago, and the 1st and 7th books are definitely different (no just the weight).

And trust me, this 7th book is the worst of the series


RE: Err
By ChronoReverse on 8/10/2007 6:32:40 PM , Rating: 2
I recall reading in an interview that Rowling had the opposite opinion. She didn't originally intend for the story to be targeted towards young children the way it is now. I wonder if this is just a figment of my imagination or whether I'll be able to find the source.


RE: Err
By Crowbar77 on 8/10/2007 6:42:27 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah the 7th book was definitely the worst of the series, but still a good one. I wouldn't call it a childrens series though, maybe for the first few books but it got alot more "grow up" as the series progressed. Especially with the latest having quite a few swears and 600+ pages.


RE: Err
By lompocus on 8/11/2007 1:35:55 AM , Rating: 2
Actually, have you read the book? It's a bit darker and meant for older people, not quite 30 year old audience but not quite the original 10 year old audience. The series was meant to age along with the audience.


RE: Err
By Scabies on 8/10/2007 7:56:44 PM , Rating: 2
you mean 17?


RE: Err
By 3kliksphilip on 8/11/2007 7:46:49 AM , Rating: 2
What's wrong with being 17?


RE: Err
By Basilisk on 8/11/2007 11:07:46 PM , Rating: 3
Nothing that isn't curable given enough time....


RE: Err
By WildfireXT on 8/12/2007 10:02:14 PM , Rating: 2
Good one....

I never really understood that until I stopped being 17 either. Teenage years is a strange phase to grow through.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki