backtop


Print 61 comment(s) - last by S3anister.. on Aug 14 at 8:32 PM

Did you know that the PS3 can play Blu-ray movies? Most gamers don’t

Much of the credit for Blu-ray Discs’ rapid surge in sales beginning in 2007 is given to the launch of the PlayStation 3. Sony’s newest console brought to the market an incredible value for the high-definition home theater enthusiast.

The PlayStation 3 remains one of the market’s cheapest, but most capable Blu-ray Disc movie players – but oddly enough, that fact isn’t as well known as one may believe. In fact, research results released by NPD Group suggest that the majority of gamers, including owners of Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 consoles, are oblivious to their machine’s high-definition capabilities.

Amazingly, the report finds that only 40 percent of PlayStation 3 owners knew that the games machine was fully capable of playing Blu-ray Disc movies. And of those who knew about the Blu-ray feature, only half had used it to play a movie during the last 10 times they used the console. The remaining half who knew about the movie player capabilities do not take advantage of the feature.

While movies may not be on every gamer’s agenda, only 30 percent of Xbox 360 owners knew of the machine’s high-definition gaming output capabilities, with the number rising to 50 percent in the case of PS3 owners. This suggests that the majority of current generation gaming still takes place on standard-definition televisions.

"The industry is still in its infancy with regard to this "next-gen" and all the expanded capabilities of the systems," said NPD analyst Anita Frazier to 1UP. "Gameplay is still king, and it may take awhile for the awareness and usage of the additional features to really take hold with consumers."

Those with HDTVs may be wishing for a high-definition Wii, but given the NPD Group’s findings, it’s easy to understand why Nintendo isn’t yet interested.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I'm Not Suprised
By Maetryx on 8/13/2007 6:04:37 PM , Rating: 2
There are some fine points and counterpoints in this discussion, which is nice to see and unexpected. :) According to Wikipedia, the median family income in the USA in 2005 was about $46k.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_t...


RE: I'm Not Suprised
By seeker353 on 8/13/2007 10:42:19 PM , Rating: 2
Median family income in 2005 was $46k, median individual income in 2005 was $25k (also according to Wikipedia). I think that the $36k was a GDP per capita figure.


RE: I'm Not Suprised
By Murst on 8/14/2007 10:21:09 AM , Rating: 2
Wikipedia is great for some things, but for statistics on the economy and such, I much prefer going to the government.

http://www.hud.gov/local/shared/working/r10/emas/m...


RE: I'm Not Suprised
By Murst on 8/14/2007 10:23:48 AM , Rating: 2
BTW, I realize that I just contradicted myself on the poverty statistic, but at least it was close... according to the census bureau, it is about 12.4 :). The wikipedia median family income just seems way off.

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/poverty05/p...


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki