backtop


Print 75 comment(s) - last by KrisFujiZ.. on Aug 15 at 5:58 PM

AMD launches a new website to educate the consumer on the evils of Intel

AMD is enjoying the fact the European Commission charged Intel for anticompetitive measures. The company enjoys the fact so much it has launched a new pseudo-advertising campaign website providing updates on the case. The new AMD website, breakfree.amd.com, provides all the information you would ever need to know on the allegations. Additionally, the site provides information on antitrust, competition and procurement.

Of course, since it is an AMD site the information is going to favor AMD. There is no mention of the official response from Intel regarding the subject matter. All the industry quotes cited by AMD reflect negatively on Intel. Not that I am trying to defend Intel or anything, but only the European Commission has charged Intel. Nothing has been proven and until there is an official ruling on the issue, I reserve my opinion on Intel’s tactics.

At the end of the day, a corporation’s primary goals are to make money. I highly doubt AMD intends to educate buyers about a competitive marketplace. However, since it is the only direct Intel competitor, it wants a bigger slice of pie. The company enjoyed major growth with the launch of Opteron and Athlon 64. The company also struck a major deal with Dell – a once Intel only house.

Sadly, like every other company, with growth and a performance-leading product, they get arrogant. The once great Intel lost the battle to 1.0 GHz to AMD’s Athlon and moved towards the clock-happy Netburst architecture. While the Netburst architecture, in its later days, had no troubles beating out the Athlon XP, the Athlon 64 and Opteron was a tougher sell.

AMD was in the lead for quite a bit, through the end of Northwood and the lifetime of Prescott, Smithfield and Presler. This is where the arrogance sets in. AMD’s fabrication processes, processors and competition was a bit lackluster. The K8 architecture remains around, after launching over three years ago. AMD is barely pushing out 65nm products and continues to hock new 90nm products. Not much has really changed from the AMD lineup except the move to dual-core.

Intel saw the mistakes of its clock-happy era and arrogance and released Conroe. The company is also on a fast track plan of shrinking fabrication processes every other year and launching completely new architectures in-between. AMD could learn a thing or two from Intel’s stringent roadmap.

I will give AMD the benefit of the doubt though. They might have a killer next-generation product, but from the early testing I have performed on Barcelona, there is no light at the end of the tunnel -- with the K10 generation at least. However, AMD isn’t planning to issue DVT samples of Barcelona to partners until later this month. Who knows, maybe they somehow gained an extra 10% in clock-for-clock performance since then.

There is still light at the end of the tunnel in the long-run. AMD’s recent Technology Analyst day revealed interesting details of the company’s modular Fusion architecture. Maybe Fusion is just what AMD needs to swing the pendulum back into its favor. Either way, AMD has a tough road ahead.

The late launch of its quad-core processors, nearly a year after Intel, and the new Phenom branding will keep the marketing team busy. There’s a lot the company needs to do, but “breaking free” is the least of its problems.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Brutal comments
By 3kliksphilip on 8/11/2007 7:41:03 AM , Rating: 2
All I can say is that AMD must be thoroughly angry with Intel to have made such a blatant 'Intel is evil' campaign. It doesn't seem like a very professional thing to do and in my opinion makes me believe that they're desperate. I feel for AMD, with them being the only serious competitor that Intel has in the CPU market, but I didn't even know that it was allowed for them to have such a stab at Intel on their website. What ever next? Will Intel have the headlines 'AMD is a sore loser'? I'm not taking sides but AMD seems to be reacting in the same way as that to a 5 year old when they get their sweets pinched. I like AMD but I don't know how much this campaign is going to raise people's awareness. Even if it does, I'm not sure if people will back AMD because of it.




RE: Brutal comments
By JumpingJack on 8/12/2007 1:38:31 AM , Rating: 2
AMD has been making this complaint since the early 90's... they have lodged complaints with both the FTC (US) and the EU, as well as any other country they can find.

The FTC has investigated Intel twice, and in one case settled and in another dropped the investigation for lack of evidence, EU investigated Intel from the late 90's to early 2000's, dropped the case for lack of evidence... and AMD simply lodged another complaint... when it does not go in their favor, they lodge another complaint.

Eventually something will stick I suspect, a company as large as Intel deals with thousands of people, there is likely going to be some zealous salesman who coersed a contract somewhere with some small outfit and it will be pounced upon... who know, it could be that Intel is indeed guilty of breaking the law, in which case the judicial process will need to ascertain the extent and what damages have been done and what reprimands will be needed.


RE: Brutal comments
By werepossum on 8/13/2007 6:22:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
All I can say is that AMD must be thoroughly angry with Intel to have made such a blatant 'Intel is evil' campaign. It


I think perhaps AMD has little else to push at the moment.

As to how AMD was hurt, the group of computers my company purchased prior to our current machines were Dells, at the owner's insistance. I had tested both Athlon 500 MHz and Pentium 500 MHz, and the Athlon was greatly superior in AutoCAD. However, Dell only offered Intel because offering any AMD processors would have greatly increased their cost for Intel processors - Intel had a very steep discount for exclusivity. Therefore we bought inferior Intel processors. Obviously AMD was damaged by Intel's business practices - after all, almost every company's business practices are designed to hurt one's competition. The only question is whether or not Intel's business practices were illegal, and that question has yet to be settled IMO.

Our current batch of computers are no-name clones from a local distributor, specifically because Dell could not deliver the AMDs. Considering Dell's growth, obviously their decision to remain Intel-exclusive worked for them at the time. (And yes, if we buy an additional machine it will almost certainly have an Intel CPU. If Intel broke the law, it should be punished - but their business practices didn't alienate me.)

BTW, AMD's first competitve product was the 80287 20 MHz co-processor, if not earlier. That was in the mid to late 80's. Having tested both brands, I can say the AMD was superior in floating point calculations at that time.


“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs

Related Articles



Latest By Anh Tuan Huynh
More NVIDIA SLI Chipsets Around the Corner
September 25, 2007, 7:40 AM
NVIDIA Prepares New AMD IGPs
September 25, 2007, 7:39 AM
NVIDIA Launches Intel IGP
September 25, 2007, 7:25 AM
Intel Shows Off 32nm Test Shuttle
September 18, 2007, 4:34 PM
Intel Sets Official "Penryn" Launch Date
September 18, 2007, 1:17 PM
VIA Launches EPIA SN With 1.8 GHz Processor
September 17, 2007, 4:00 PM
Freescale Licenses AMD Technologies
September 17, 2007, 3:43 PM
AMD Adds Triple-Core Processors to Roadmap
September 17, 2007, 2:45 PM
Lenovo Announces Solar Power Capable Desktop
September 13, 2007, 2:00 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki