Print 69 comment(s) - last by vortmax.. on Aug 3 at 11:08 AM

Another milder-than-normal season takes shape

During the active 2005 hurricane season, the usual doom-and-gloom prophets blamed the storms on global warming. "Nature's wrath," we were told, "hath been unleashed". Aided by a complaisant media, we were told this was our wakeup call, come to punish us for our SUV-driving ways.

Then disaster struck.  The 2006 season not only didn't live up to predictions, it wound up being one of the quietest seasons of the past century. No matter. We were told to ignore this year-long blip, told that 2007 would come roaring back with a vengeance.

And yet, here we are, two full months into the season, and not a single hurricane has formed. Not one. Just two mild tropical storms, one of which didn't even strike land, and a third storm which never went above subtropical status. Hurricane forecasters are busily downgrading their predictions for the rest of the season.

And so it goes. The sky isn't falling yet. But what about the future? Will global warming wreck all our beach-going vacations?

There are two schools of thought regarding the effects of climate change on hurricane science. The first begins with the fact that hurricanes require warm water to form. Global warming means warmer water, leading to the naive conclusion is that more hurricanes will form. The second school realizes that hurricanes are heat engines -- driven not by raw temperature, but by temperature differentials between regions. Global warming warms the arctic and temperate belts, but not the tropics. This reduces the total energy available for major storm formation. It also increases upper-level wind shear, which tends to tear apart storms before they grow too strong. This school believes the long term effects of global warming will be fewer, milder storms.

Climate change aside, hurricanes come and go in cycles. Professor William Gray, one of the nation's most respected hurricane forecasters, believes storm activity will remain high for the next several years, due simply to a long-term cycle of changing Atlantic currents. A team of researchers led by Dr. Chris Landsea of the National Hurricane Center goes further. In a paper published last year, they claim storm rates have not risen over the past 100 years, but only that improved monitoring technology results in registering storms which would have previously been missed. And professors Vecchi and Soden's research on wind shear suggests no long-term storm activity increase should be expected.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not selling my ocean-front condo just yet.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Tropics not warming ???
By AlexWade on 8/2/2007 8:12:40 AM , Rating: 2
I may be wrong about this, but what I've seen, the Southern Hemisphere (the one with much less land and people) is getting colder. I saw something, I didn't save the link, where South Africa had 50+ days of below normal cold weather. And this study I found by Dr. Vyas which shows antarctic sea ice increasing by 13,000+ km a year, and accelerating.
Vyas et al conclude that their estimates may actually understate the increase in sea ice: “the increasing trend in the sea ice extent over the Antarctic region may be slowly accelerating in time, particularly over the last decade. In fact, it is interesting to note that most of the SSM/I
derived sea ice extents estimates during the middle of the last decade have been on the higher side of the long-term trend.”

That is one of my favorite links. I got into a discussion about GW with someone who was (blindly) saying humans are causing it. I showed him that, and he refused to read it. Basically, it involved facts. Facts are the GW eco-nazis worst nightmare. I find most of their arguments rely only on emotion, and when the facts don't support them, they make claims like "you are in bed with Big Oil" or "you hate babies" or use some other personal attack. Because, as we all know, when you have nothing, then you must make your opponent appear evil.

There is a reason meteorologists who don't work at the Weather Channel say GW is natural. The Weather Channel pushes bad weather news because that is the only way people will watch that station. I stopped watching years ago because I found their weather to be about as accurate as a blind archer. In fact, one day I found that their forecast changed dramatically 3 straight hours. Other Meteorologists, who are paid to study weather, say GW is natural.

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki