backtop


Print 93 comment(s) - last by Hoser McMoose.. on Jul 13 at 2:47 PM


Honda Odyssey

Honda Pilot

Honda Ridgeline
Honda to introduce a new 3.5 liter V6 diesel by 2010

While many domestic and foreign automakers are looking to hybrid technology to improve fuel efficiency across their auto lines, Honda is looking towards the tried and true: diesel engines.

It was reported last month that the next generation Honda Accord would forgo its slow-selling and poor-performing Accord Hybrid with a diesel variant. The oil-burning Honda Accord will feature a 2.2 liter i-CTDi Tier 2 Bin 5 diesel engine along with an ammonia-filled catalytic converter to reduce NOx emissions.

Honda is also poised to make a new 3.5 liter V6 diesel engine available for its larger vehicles including the Odyssey minivan, Pilot mid-sized SUV and the Ridgeline mid-sized pickup truck. The new Tier 2 Bin 5 diesel will first be available in 2010 according to the Japanese Nikkei newspaper.

The engine is said to be 30 percent more fuel efficient than Honda's current 3.5 liter V6 gasoline engine (rated at 17/24, 15/20 and 15/20 respectively in the Odyssey, Pilot and Ridgeline based on 2008 EPA estimates). The new motor is also said to produce 20 percent less carbon dioxide as the 3.5 liter V6 gasoline engine.

Honda's new diesels likely won't come under as much scrutiny for failure to achieve EPA estimates as has been the case with hybrids. Honda knows this first-hand as it recently became the target of a class-action lawsuit regarding poor fuel economy on the Civic Hybrid.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: It amuses me
By hubajube on 7/11/2007 12:23:15 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In terms of efficiency and being a "clean" engine, EU passed US long time ago.
Wrong! CARB is STILL the most stringent emissions regulation on the planet. Most diesels can't pass CARB regs and can't be sold in CARB regulated states.


RE: It amuses me
By TheWizardofOz on 7/11/2007 1:00:41 PM , Rating: 1
Yes they do.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYH/is_5_7...

The only thing that diesel is not popular in US is:

1.) Because DC and GM cannot produce proper diesel technology and their non-efficient gasoline cars cannot compete with a 50+MPG europen diesel cars

2.) People think that diesels are low powered, dirty engines, which made infamous by GM in 70s and 80s, for the first reason that I pointed out.


RE: It amuses me
By Samus on 7/11/07, Rating: -1
RE: It amuses me
By TomZ on 7/11/2007 1:20:19 PM , Rating: 2
Apparently making up "facts" is also the American way.

[Catalytic converters were] first widely introduced on series-production automobiles in the US market for the 1975 model year to comply with tightening EPA regulations on auto exhaust, catalytic converters are still most commonly used in motor vehicle exhaust systems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalytic_converter

The rest of your post is also crap - what is all that drivel about "lifestyle is much more wasteful..."? If you don't like the U.S., then by all means please move to Europe. That's freedom which truly is "the American way."


RE: It amuses me
By FITCamaro on 7/11/2007 2:07:11 PM , Rating: 2
While I agree that recycling programs aren't up to snuff here, the rest of what you say is pure crap.

I don't drive a huge SUV, don't use extremely power hungry tech (how exactly do you classify this when European's use largely the same electronics we do), and try not to waste.

As the above poster said, if you don't like things here and love the way things are in Europe, why do you go there? Another part of the American way is giving you the freedom to leave.

Just because some drive giant SUVs when they don't need them, doesn't mean the general consensus of this country is that is whats best. If I needed an SUV, I'd drive one. But I likely never will, so I won't. Now if I eventually have 4 kids, then I'll consider it.


RE: It amuses me
By TomZ on 7/11/2007 1:14:34 PM , Rating: 2
I don't see how that link supports your statement.

Here's a quote for you from that article:

However, the PSA [European] car doesn't meet LEV-2 or EPA Tier 2/Bin 5 emissions limits for nitrogen oxides (NOx). As one California Energy Commission (CEC) official commented to us following the SAE presentations, U.S. EPA calculates that the PSA car "emits NOx at 0.6 grams/mile versus 0.08 g/mi as required in the U.S."

quote:
Because DC and GM cannot produce proper diesel technology and their non-efficient gasoline cars cannot compete with a 50+MPG europen diesel cars

Who owns DC? Who owns Opal? Hmmm...


RE: It amuses me
By TheWizardofOz on 7/11/07, Rating: 0
RE: It amuses me
By TomZ on 7/11/2007 1:39:16 PM , Rating: 2
My point about ownership is that Chrysler is owned (now sold however) by German Daimler-Chrysler (previously Daimler-Benz), and Opal is owned by GM. In the case of Chrysler, obviously the parent company "had the ability to make decent diesels," as is the case with Opal.

So it's not like the U.S. automaker's "can't" make decent diesels - they just haven't yet for the U.S. market because there is pretty low demand. U.S. consumers largely don't want diesels, right or wrong, and it will take some time for that demand to potentially grow. And the tension on the other side is of course the U.S. emissions standards that make diesels more challenging, as discussed elsewhere on this thread.


"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki