Print 17 comment(s) - last by lplatypus.. on Jun 25 at 10:07 PM

Performance NDA of the upcoming 1333 MHz front-side bus Core 2 Duo E6750 lifted

Intel today lifted the performance non-disclosure agreement, or NDA, for the first product of its Core 2 Duo E6x50-sequence lineup—the Core 2 Duo E6750. Despite being the first refreshed Conroe-based processor since the original Conroe debut, excluding Kentsfield, the Core 2 Duo E6750 clocks in below the dual-core flagship Core 2 Extreme X6800. Intel clocks the Core 2 Duo E6750 at 2.66 GHz, identical to the E6700.

New to the Core 2 Duo E6750 however, is a faster 1333 MHz front-side bus to match the new Bearlake chipset-family, including the new P35 Express. Besides the faster front-side bus, the new Core 2 Duo E6750 has an identical feature set to the E6700 including 4MB of shared L2 cache. Other Core 2 Duo E6x50-sequence processors have the same shared 4MB L2 cache configuration and Intel has no plans of releasing a 1333 MHz front-side bus processor with 2MB of L2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo
L2 Cache
FSBJuly 22nd
E68503.00 GHz 4MB1333 MHz
E6750 2.66 GHz 4MB1333 MHz
E6550 2.33 GHz 4MB 1333 MHz
E6540 2.33 GHz 4MB 1333 MHz

Intel Virtualization, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep, Intel 64 and Execute Disable Bit technologies make a return on the Core 2 Duo E6750 and E6x50-sequence processors. Intel Trusted Execution Technology, formerly known as La Grande, sneaks its way into the new Core 2 Duo E6750 and E6x50-sequence processors.

Expect a hard launch of the Core 2 Duo E6750 and E6x50-sequence processors in the coming weeks. Intel plans to launch four Core 2 Duo E6x50-sequence processors with speeds varying from 2.33 GHz to 3.0 GHz including a TXT-less E6540.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By myterrybear on 6/25/2007 3:04:16 PM , Rating: -1
Well with the release of these cpu's as well as the price drops especialy the ones coming up soon, this is nothing more then Intel snowballin AMD's sales & also pooling more of there money. Cause as we all know .. Intel is sittin on a big bank role while AMD is strugging to keep things afloat even with ATI now onboard.

Think about it this way ... intel knows it has done some back handed dealing on top of brainwashing most folks into thinking " oohhhh Intel makes the BEST processors out there why would I want a not best processor like a AMD is " with all there comercials intel puts out there. AND the court case involving the what looks to be solid evidence of intel tampering with processor sales is going to guarentee AMD a crapload of coin to dump into there own R&D & other business's that they have & of course when that happens I am prettyshure it will start tom make AMD a more competative company against the giant Intel which of course will not have so much money then for themselves when the dust has settled.

Am I a AMD fanboy .... not realy nor am I a ocin enthusiest. BUT I shure as hell won't buy a Intel cpu as long as they keep proclaimin to be the preverbial cats arse when it comes to ALL there cpu's when they are oviously not. :)

By paydirt on 6/25/2007 3:44:33 PM , Rating: 3
I don't know what your benchmark is, but you're in a State of da "River in Egypt" if you don't believe Intel is on tops right now. Performance/$ Intel wins.

Can you provide ANY evidence against the litany of sources that AMD has a better general processor (for dollar spent) vs Intel right now?

By myterrybear on 6/25/2007 3:54:41 PM , Rating: 2
I am refering to intels countless campains over the years claiming there products are ALL the best. Seriously you can't tell me you are going to say a Celron is a far superiour cpu compared to any AMD one that is on the market now are you ?? :P

By KCjoker on 6/25/2007 6:19:23 PM , Rating: 2
What do you expect a company to say? Our product sucks compared to the competition? You don't see AMD saying that since the C2D came out even though it's true.

By paydirt on 6/25/2007 8:43:21 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry to say, but you're living in the past. Intel currently has a big lead over AMD. The Celeron? WHAT? Hey, the year is 2007. Yeah, Intel advertises, big deal!

And yes, waaaay back in the day, Intel processors were more stable. AMD eventually took the lead and Intel has it back for now.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Related Articles
MSI Readies P35 Express Motherboards
May 3, 2007, 12:00 AM
Gigabyte United Preps DDR3 Motherboards
April 30, 2007, 8:49 PM
"Conroe" Refresh Details Unveiled
October 17, 2006, 2:05 PM
Intel "Bearlake" Plans Unveiled
October 17, 2006, 1:24 PM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki