Intel this week revealed new details about where it plans to
take its server processor business, specifically with the Itanium processor. As
many know, Intel took a gamble on the Itanium when it was released several
years ago. Intel's use of a then uncommon Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC)
architecture left the majority of the industry unsure of Itanium's practicality in an
x86-dominated world. Today however, the Itanium family brings in roughly $3.5
billion per annun for Intel.
Diane Bryant, vice president of Intel's enterprise group, revealed several
details that indicate Intel will push forward with Itanium development for the
Currently, Intel's flagship Itanium 2 processor is the Montecito core.
Intel announced Montecito last July, marking the company's first
dual-core enterprise and mainframe processor. Until now, Montecito ran
on a 533MHz front-side bus but will soon make the transition a 667MHz front-side
bus processor in Q4 2007, dubbed Montvale. According to Bryant, Montvale
will consist of minor updates, improving bus speed but also improving
Recent Intel roadmaps indicate that Montvale will consist of roughly 25
percent of Intel's Itanium business in Q4 2007. By Q1 2008, Intel guidance
suggests Montvale will take up a whopping 40 percent of all Itanium 2
sales. Despite Intel's desktop processors currently seeing day light at 65nm,
Itanium 2 processors will still be on 90nm manufacturing technology. Montvale
will also top out at a core speed of 1.66GHz with a total of 24MB of L3
Intel's next major milestone in the Itanium family will come with the arrival
of Tukwila, a quad-core processor due sometime in late 2008. According
to Bryant, Tukwila will be roughly twice as fast as Montecito and
feature an on-die memory controller.
This will be a turning point for Intel because with Tukwila's need for a
discrete memory controller gone, the company will introduce its long waited
common system interface (CSI). Tukwila's use of CSI will be a direct
response to AMD's HyperTransport technology. Intel previously stated it
will not restrict CSI to the Itanium family, but will eventually use the
technology as the main transport bus for the Xeon family as well.
Tukwila will also come with even larger caches and a new reliability
feature called double device data correction (DDDC). DDDC acts as a failsafe
mechanism to protect system memory failures from bringing down a live system.
In a hardware failure where a memory chip on a memory module fails, DDDC will
be able to mark that chip as unusable without compromising system stability.
DDDC differs from traditional ECC and parity technology due to its capability
to withstand more than one chip failure.
Bryant went on to reveal details about the future release of an entirely new
Itanium architecture code-named Poulson. With Poulson, Bryant
claims Intel will introduce even more cores; greater scalability and the
introduction of 32nm die fabrication for its enterprise segment. The company
will skip 45nm technology altogether for Itanium. Bryant did not give details
on a possible release date for Poulson although Intel is expecting to introduce 32nm
processors in approximately two years.
quote: I think, in his heart, the original poster may have been intending for the core count to reach this level.
quote: (Although, for all its concentration on number crunching, some maybe interested to know that per CPU, an Itanium II @ 1.6 GHz is about 15% slower than an Opteron @ 2.4 GHz on the same job)
quote: n4250QE (S4985) AMD Opteron 2222SE: 14.3 15.2HP Integrity rx6600 (1.6GHz/24MB Dual-Core Intel Itanium 2): 17.3 18.1Dual core to Dual core, 1.6G (Itanium) vs 3.0G (Opteron)