Print 22 comment(s) - last by flipsu5.. on Jun 15 at 9:54 AM

A MID prototype running Linux. (Source: The Tech Report)
AMD and Intel believe the industry's next revolution is in hand held devices

Early last year, Microsoft revealed its ultra mobile computing platform. Smaller than a laptop but larger than a PDA, Microsoft's Origami project set the playing field for others to follow. At the time, Origami was positioned as an Internet browsing device with rudimentary multimedia capabilities. Unfortunately, the Origami project never materialized in any sort of substantial offering, but then again Microsoft has a bit of a hit-or-miss history when it comes to developing hardware.

That never deterred Intel or AMD, two companies with long histories rooted in hardware development, from stepping in where Microsoft left off. Lest there be any doubt, neither company is just picking up Microsoft's pieces; they're going into the ultra-mobile playing field at full throttle.

Almost simultaneously, both AMD and Intel roadmaps indicated the industry would head towards devices that allow consumers to browse the Internet in a full featured manner, but not be constrained to traditional laptop weights.

Intel invested heavily into this ultra mobile personal computer (UMPC) market. Earlier this year the company announced Silverthorne, a mobile processor that it showed off during Computex last week. Silverthorne and the future of mobile computing is so important to Intel that CEO Paul Otellini recently stated to German newspaper F.A.Z. (English),  "The new chip, codenamed Silverthorne is as important as the original Pentium and the 8088 processor."

Silverthorne will be a 45nm processor with a die footprint size smaller than a U.S. nickel. Intel aims to grab up to roughly 20-percent of the mobile phone market with Silverthorne and indicated that Silverthorne can also be used in UMPC. Otellini promises the average price of a Silverthorne-based product will be $100 USD.

AMD is right on Intel's heels with its ultra-mobile technology dubbed Bobcat. According to AMD executive vice president, Henri Richard, Bobcat is positioned for the UMPC market -- above a PDA platform but below a full-fledge notebook.

During his Computex address, Richard outlined the disparity between PDA and mobility processing.  Cell phone and PDAs, which traditionally have power consumption figures labeled in milliwatts, are not powerful enough to run x86 applications.  Likewise, Richard elaborates, x86 processors are just starting to break into single-digit wattage consumption envelopes while still being useful. However, Richard was clear on one thing: AMD will have an x86 sub-5W processor capable of substantial computing power for mobile devices.

Richard would not reveal a date for the Bobcat introduction, but hinted at a post-2008 announcement. Judging from recent AMD roadmaps, Bobcat appears like it will be one of the first fruits of AMD's Fusion project, combining a CPU and a GPU into one chip. 

During another presentation, Intel vice president of the Mobile Platforms Group, Anand Chandreskhar detailed the Intel mobile Internet device platform, or MID. According to Chandreskhar, MIDs are a whole new class of devices and do not belong in the mobile phone or computer category -- though in reality MID sounds incredibly similar to the Microsoft Origami project.  The company's list of Intel partners for MID development includes ASUS, Compal, HTC and Microsoft.

Intel demonstrated working MID prototypes at its Computex this year, indicating how close MID devices are to market. While Intel indicated that MIDs will use a highly customized "light" operating system, one MID on display ran a stripped down version of Windows Vista.

Intel representatives state that MID devices will be ready by 2010 to 2011 and will cost around $500. It is unclear whether or not MIDs will integrate mobile phone capabilities but Chandrasekhar indicated that users "will not be disappointed" when it comes to graphics capabilities. Most of today's top mobile phones cost around $500 and so it's a bit unclear where consumers decide between a MID, a mobile phone or both.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Windows Mobile
By noirsoft on 6/13/2007 4:25:34 PM , Rating: 2
If they had something in these form factors that ran Windows Mobile, I'd seriously consider it. For the cool factor if nothing else, since I already have a 12" laptop and a smartphone, and don't really _need_ anything in between.

Full Windows is overkill as stated by many others, and Linux is, well, Linix, which means it won't easily run .NET and therefore will not be nearly as easy to write good apps for.

RE: Windows Mobile
By feelingshorter on 6/13/2007 4:53:16 PM , Rating: 1
Speaking of overkill, I wouldn't run anything with Windows Vista on it in one of these devices. Its simply bloatware when you run it on these small devices. Remember the Samsung 800mhz UMPC that was considered "slow"? Its 800mhz! What I care about is the software. If it takes up so much system resources to run just the underlying layer (OS), then there isn't much room left to run the software. Its a waste of battery life. Ubuntu Linux can achieve very good visuals without the massive hardware requirements. I'd agree with you that if they had something in Windows Mobile, or even Linux then I'd jump on the bandwagon. But why would MS do that? Its to their advantage to make Vista bloatware so their brother, Intel, sells more processors.

RE: Windows Mobile
By B166ER on 6/14/2007 2:20:11 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe if we could get an "educational" downsizing of Vista, sure. Drop the expanded security, lip glosss, sparkle, and multimedia extras (unless theyre "integrated into the code itself") and you might be able to get by with it running quite smoothly in a 800mhz rig, 128-256 sys mem (but y'all know how weee do it, 1 gig big babbbyyyy!!) and some 10-20 gig flash or 60 gig 1.5" harddrive. Then we've got .NET support, and many quality features of Vista slimmed down to make a diff. Wont feel like driving a Mercedes to McD's. Hmm, now that I've put it that way, I feel there could be a sooner opportuniy than later for these things.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki