backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by flipsu5.. on Jun 15 at 9:54 AM


A MID prototype running Linux. (Source: The Tech Report)
AMD and Intel believe the industry's next revolution is in hand held devices

Early last year, Microsoft revealed its ultra mobile computing platform. Smaller than a laptop but larger than a PDA, Microsoft's Origami project set the playing field for others to follow. At the time, Origami was positioned as an Internet browsing device with rudimentary multimedia capabilities. Unfortunately, the Origami project never materialized in any sort of substantial offering, but then again Microsoft has a bit of a hit-or-miss history when it comes to developing hardware.

That never deterred Intel or AMD, two companies with long histories rooted in hardware development, from stepping in where Microsoft left off. Lest there be any doubt, neither company is just picking up Microsoft's pieces; they're going into the ultra-mobile playing field at full throttle.

Almost simultaneously, both AMD and Intel roadmaps indicated the industry would head towards devices that allow consumers to browse the Internet in a full featured manner, but not be constrained to traditional laptop weights.

Intel invested heavily into this ultra mobile personal computer (UMPC) market. Earlier this year the company announced Silverthorne, a mobile processor that it showed off during Computex last week. Silverthorne and the future of mobile computing is so important to Intel that CEO Paul Otellini recently stated to German newspaper F.A.Z. (English),  "The new chip, codenamed Silverthorne is as important as the original Pentium and the 8088 processor."

Silverthorne will be a 45nm processor with a die footprint size smaller than a U.S. nickel. Intel aims to grab up to roughly 20-percent of the mobile phone market with Silverthorne and indicated that Silverthorne can also be used in UMPC. Otellini promises the average price of a Silverthorne-based product will be $100 USD.

AMD is right on Intel's heels with its ultra-mobile technology dubbed Bobcat. According to AMD executive vice president, Henri Richard, Bobcat is positioned for the UMPC market -- above a PDA platform but below a full-fledge notebook.

During his Computex address, Richard outlined the disparity between PDA and mobility processing.  Cell phone and PDAs, which traditionally have power consumption figures labeled in milliwatts, are not powerful enough to run x86 applications.  Likewise, Richard elaborates, x86 processors are just starting to break into single-digit wattage consumption envelopes while still being useful. However, Richard was clear on one thing: AMD will have an x86 sub-5W processor capable of substantial computing power for mobile devices.

Richard would not reveal a date for the Bobcat introduction, but hinted at a post-2008 announcement. Judging from recent AMD roadmaps, Bobcat appears like it will be one of the first fruits of AMD's Fusion project, combining a CPU and a GPU into one chip. 

During another presentation, Intel vice president of the Mobile Platforms Group, Anand Chandreskhar detailed the Intel mobile Internet device platform, or MID. According to Chandreskhar, MIDs are a whole new class of devices and do not belong in the mobile phone or computer category -- though in reality MID sounds incredibly similar to the Microsoft Origami project.  The company's list of Intel partners for MID development includes ASUS, Compal, HTC and Microsoft.

Intel demonstrated working MID prototypes at its Computex this year, indicating how close MID devices are to market. While Intel indicated that MIDs will use a highly customized "light" operating system, one MID on display ran a stripped down version of Windows Vista.

Intel representatives state that MID devices will be ready by 2010 to 2011 and will cost around $500. It is unclear whether or not MIDs will integrate mobile phone capabilities but Chandrasekhar indicated that users "will not be disappointed" when it comes to graphics capabilities. Most of today's top mobile phones cost around $500 and so it's a bit unclear where consumers decide between a MID, a mobile phone or both.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: U.S. nickel?
By splint on 6/13/2007 2:09:09 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Silverthorne will be a 45nm processor with a die footprint size smaller than a U.S. nickel

Specifically, I was referring to the fact that judging from the technology size and die size you can get a rough estimate of the transistor count. The Core 2 has 291 million transistors on a 143 mm^2 die at 65 nm. The area of a dime (assuming the footprint will be larger than a dime by the article) is 252 mm^2, so a Silverthorne at 45nm and roughly that footprint would be a massive chip in terms of transistor count. Also, I still think a chip that size in a mobile phone is huge, so what gives? Are they referring to the package size?


RE: U.S. nickel?
By Treckin on 6/13/2007 4:31:54 PM , Rating: 3
Its not a mobile phone.
Also, given its 'large' size, the AMD will integrate graphics on die...
If they add to that somewhere like 10 or 20 gb of flash, partitioned somewhat like virtual memory, than the storage and system ram would use the same component.
IMO the real challenge will be the usefulness of these without a fast, reliable, nationwide infrastructure.
These UMPC's, MID's, whatever the nomenclature, are trying to recreate the success of the IPOD...
They fail to recognize, or at least pay no public tribute to, the IPODS reason for success: The only required infrastructure by the end user for the IPOD was a computer. For UMPC's to be useful, there needs to be nationwide broadband coverage. It is almost laughable to put that much computing power in a UMPC, as it can still only load web pages as fast as whatever network they're on runs at.
Perhaps by 2009 Google will have stepped up its free wifi access.
The IPOD could reach those in rural areas, whereas people with UMPC's will not be able to get access there.

Also, I think the size is a major issue, as previously discussed. Where are people going to put these?


"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki