Print 22 comment(s) - last by flipsu5.. on Jun 15 at 9:54 AM

A MID prototype running Linux. (Source: The Tech Report)
AMD and Intel believe the industry's next revolution is in hand held devices

Early last year, Microsoft revealed its ultra mobile computing platform. Smaller than a laptop but larger than a PDA, Microsoft's Origami project set the playing field for others to follow. At the time, Origami was positioned as an Internet browsing device with rudimentary multimedia capabilities. Unfortunately, the Origami project never materialized in any sort of substantial offering, but then again Microsoft has a bit of a hit-or-miss history when it comes to developing hardware.

That never deterred Intel or AMD, two companies with long histories rooted in hardware development, from stepping in where Microsoft left off. Lest there be any doubt, neither company is just picking up Microsoft's pieces; they're going into the ultra-mobile playing field at full throttle.

Almost simultaneously, both AMD and Intel roadmaps indicated the industry would head towards devices that allow consumers to browse the Internet in a full featured manner, but not be constrained to traditional laptop weights.

Intel invested heavily into this ultra mobile personal computer (UMPC) market. Earlier this year the company announced Silverthorne, a mobile processor that it showed off during Computex last week. Silverthorne and the future of mobile computing is so important to Intel that CEO Paul Otellini recently stated to German newspaper F.A.Z. (English),  "The new chip, codenamed Silverthorne is as important as the original Pentium and the 8088 processor."

Silverthorne will be a 45nm processor with a die footprint size smaller than a U.S. nickel. Intel aims to grab up to roughly 20-percent of the mobile phone market with Silverthorne and indicated that Silverthorne can also be used in UMPC. Otellini promises the average price of a Silverthorne-based product will be $100 USD.

AMD is right on Intel's heels with its ultra-mobile technology dubbed Bobcat. According to AMD executive vice president, Henri Richard, Bobcat is positioned for the UMPC market -- above a PDA platform but below a full-fledge notebook.

During his Computex address, Richard outlined the disparity between PDA and mobility processing.  Cell phone and PDAs, which traditionally have power consumption figures labeled in milliwatts, are not powerful enough to run x86 applications.  Likewise, Richard elaborates, x86 processors are just starting to break into single-digit wattage consumption envelopes while still being useful. However, Richard was clear on one thing: AMD will have an x86 sub-5W processor capable of substantial computing power for mobile devices.

Richard would not reveal a date for the Bobcat introduction, but hinted at a post-2008 announcement. Judging from recent AMD roadmaps, Bobcat appears like it will be one of the first fruits of AMD's Fusion project, combining a CPU and a GPU into one chip. 

During another presentation, Intel vice president of the Mobile Platforms Group, Anand Chandreskhar detailed the Intel mobile Internet device platform, or MID. According to Chandreskhar, MIDs are a whole new class of devices and do not belong in the mobile phone or computer category -- though in reality MID sounds incredibly similar to the Microsoft Origami project.  The company's list of Intel partners for MID development includes ASUS, Compal, HTC and Microsoft.

Intel demonstrated working MID prototypes at its Computex this year, indicating how close MID devices are to market. While Intel indicated that MIDs will use a highly customized "light" operating system, one MID on display ran a stripped down version of Windows Vista.

Intel representatives state that MID devices will be ready by 2010 to 2011 and will cost around $500. It is unclear whether or not MIDs will integrate mobile phone capabilities but Chandrasekhar indicated that users "will not be disappointed" when it comes to graphics capabilities. Most of today's top mobile phones cost around $500 and so it's a bit unclear where consumers decide between a MID, a mobile phone or both.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Interesting fight
By djc208 on 6/13/2007 9:46:27 AM , Rating: 2
For the MIDs to work they're going to need to go cheaper fairly quickly, with more powerful UMPC above them and more capable cell phones below them it's going to be a tough fight if they can't get the prices to the point where people are willing to buy both the cell and the MID, because I can't see them overlapping much unless the flexible screens become available by then.

This could be the push that Google is looking for though, with all their web based apps a decent MID could almost replace a laptop for most basic computer stuff (e-mail, office apps, web browsing, etc.)

RE: Interesting fight
By KristopherKubicki on 6/13/2007 9:54:53 AM , Rating: 2
I didn't want to put it in the scope of the article, but I think Fujitsu and Samsung might be the two closest to a true MID as is. The $799 Samsung Q1 Ultra isn't really functional (I think it actually got recalled) but the $899 one works great.

They really arent that far from a $500 price point -- though I think to get into that $100 device price point something totally different is needed (SOC probably)

RE: Interesting fight
By crystal clear on 6/13/2007 10:40:08 AM , Rating: 2
A MID prototype running Linux. (Source: The Tech Report)

If MIDs will be the next big thing,also comes with it Ubuntu Linux.
"Silverthorne will not be able to run Windows Vista"

RE: Interesting fight
By crystal clear on 6/13/2007 10:53:52 AM , Rating: 2
"a true MID as is"

With a form factor that fits between the UMPC and a smartphone, a 5” screen, flash-based storage, a light operating system.

RE: Interesting fight
By encryptkeeper on 6/13/2007 12:44:14 PM , Rating: 2
Intel aims to grab up to roughly 20-percent of the mobile phone market with Silverthorne and indicated that Silverthorne can also be used in UMPC. Otellini promises the average price of a Silverthorne-based product will be $100 USD.

Intel would be smart to put this Silverthorne technology towards smartphones rather than UMPCs. Those things just aren't making the real impact that smartphones are. UMPCs are supposed to be small enough to take anywhere, but in what? They're too big for pockets, and too big for belt clips (from what I can tell) and they're too small to warrant a carrying bag like a laptop bag (I guess the UMPC bag would look more like a purse, which few guys want to carry for more than a few seconds).

RE: Interesting fight
By KristopherKubicki on 6/13/2007 12:48:53 PM , Rating: 2
Where do guys put their DS or PSP? UMPCs are about the same size.

RE: Interesting fight
By Mitch101 on 6/13/2007 1:21:12 PM , Rating: 2
That all depends on if it has vibrate or not.

RE: Interesting fight
By omnicronx on 6/13/2007 1:29:06 PM , Rating: 1
so i guess you keep it down the back of your boxers eh? ;)

RE: Interesting fight
By Mitch101 on 6/13/2007 1:45:47 PM , Rating: 1
Or in my wife's pocket to jump start her.

RE: Interesting fight
By encryptkeeper on 6/14/2007 9:48:12 AM , Rating: 2
They just always looked bigger in pictures. Whatever.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki