Print 93 comment(s) - last by jazkat.. on Jun 28 at 10:35 PM

Cinebench ran AMD "Barcelona" 1.6 GHz in 27 seconds. (Source: DailyTech, Anh Huynh)

Cinebench ran Xeon X3220 2.4 GHz in 17 seconds. (Source: DailyTech, Anh Huynh)
An early AMD "Barcelona" revision gets its first non-simulated benchmark

Earlier today, AMD announced that it successfully demonstrated Barcelona across the server market.  The company did not publically state how fast the processor was running, the stepping of the processor, the processor thermal envelope or the eventual ship date.

We had the opportunity to benchmark the AMD Barcelona, native quad-core on an early stepping. We only had a few minutes to test the chip, but we were able to run a quick Cinebench before we were instructed to leave.

The AMD benchmark ran on a single-socket, K10 CPU running at 1.6 GHz on NVIDIA's nForce Professional 3400 chipset.  According to the system properties, the AMD system used 4GB of DDR2-667.

The most similar Intel system we could muster up on such short notice was an Intel Xeon 3220.  The Xeon X3220 is clocked at 2.4 GHz, and ran on Intel's Garlow platform (Intel X38).  This system property profile stated the system utilized 4GB of DDR2-800.

Cinebench completed the default benchmark in 27 seconds for the 1.6 GHz K10; 17 seconds for the Intel Xeon X3220.  The Kentsfield Xeon was 58% faster with a 50% higher clock frequency for Cinebench.

Both systems ran Windows 2003 R2, 64-bit.

AMD partner engineers tell DailyTech the chip we tested was the latest revision silicon.  The same engineers claim 2.0 GHz Barcelona chips are making the rounds, with 2.3 GHz already on the desktop and server roadmaps. 

AMD's current guidance suggests a late July announcement for Barcelona.  However, when DailyTech tracked down the individual partners named in AMD's press release, all cited "optimistic September" ship dates for motherboards. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Not so good for AMD
By Reynod on 6/6/2007 8:27:48 AM , Rating: -1
Kubicki thrives on creating dissent and feeds on the mayhem. I'm sure this is another Intel sponsored feed from the masters.

This sort of rubbish doesn't bode well for Anand's site either ... it's starting to sound like Tom's Hardware.

Gutter tactics like this will simply see AMD crash quickly and a monopoly of Intel only products out there.

With the US firmly in control of all cpu silicon and the OS market as it stands you will see what the end result of free market policy is in IT.

You will pay through the nose and be led around like sheep.

A truly free market requires many competitors ... not one (however benevolant).

The single socket comparison is useless anyway condsidering servers ... and you know it Kubicki too!!

If we are talking server power then the current Opteron servers still rule the roost anyway.

For those of you stupid enough to argue check out this link ...

I rest my case.

RE: Not so good for AMD
By defter on 6/6/2007 8:34:30 AM , Rating: 2
The single socket comparison is useless anyway condsidering servers

Single socket comparison is not useless, since Barcelona based CPUs will be used also in the desktop and single socket servers.

I'm sure that Dailytech would be happy to benchmark dual or quad socket Barcelona systems, but it seems that they got access only to a single socket system at Computex.

RE: Not so good for AMD
By dess on 6/6/2007 12:32:17 PM , Rating: 3
Single socket comparison is not useless, since Barcelona based CPUs will be used also in the desktop and single socket servers.

It is actually not true in this form. Barcelona is a HT2.0, non-split power plane part, intended to be used in place of the older Opterons. Desktop (and some of single socket server) parts will be based on Budapest, a HT3.0, split power planes part, what - according to some reports - enables it to be clocked (much?) higher than Barcelona, as well.

Also, Cinebench is scaling rather along the clock, not along true performance. See:
So it was just the worst selection to make a test in this case...

RE: Not so good for AMD
By Topweasel on 6/7/2007 11:07:12 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah looking at that only the Core 2 duo comes close to jump out of its spot MHz wise vs. the Performance and even then they seem to leap from maybe one position.

RE: Not so good for AMD
By AntDX316 on 6/10/07, Rating: 0
RE: Not so good for AMD
By vignyan on 6/7/2007 10:13:34 AM , Rating: 2
A truly free market requires many competitors

Agreed. So AMD must be coming up WRT performance not the otherways! :)

Also this is an early silicon. So cross your fingers for the actual stepping.

I am just thankful that Barcelona is a "real" project and not just a paper project! :)

RE: Not so good for AMD
By Calin on 6/8/2007 8:06:23 AM , Rating: 2
The performance of the early silicon for the AM2 processors didn't increase much in the last 3 months before launch. But I really hope this time it will

RE: Not so good for AMD
By Gibby82 on 6/10/2007 12:46:29 AM , Rating: 2
Early silicon for AM2? All AM2 was is a package change and the move to DDR2 support. Other than DDR2 it's K8/939 on an different package. Of course you won't see any performance increase.

RE: Not so good for AMD
By Gibby82 on 6/10/2007 12:47:36 AM , Rating: 2
*AM2 is just* a package change...

RE: Not so good for AMD
By knowyourenemy on 6/12/2007 1:44:17 AM , Rating: 2
The personal attack was uncalled for, but I do see your point. A little more tact, maybe. :/

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki