AMD Partners Demonstrate "Barcelona" at 1.6 GHz
Kristopher Kubicki & Marcus Yam
June 6, 2007 3:13 AM
comment(s) - last by
Windows 2003 R2, 64-bit identifies the "Barcelona" processor as an unknown AMD CPU. (Source: DailyTech, Anh Huynh)
AMD's benchmarking utility reveals all four cores ran at 1.6 GHz. (Source: DailyTech, Anh Huynh)
Quad-Core AMD Opteron demonstrated by MSI, Supermicro, TYAN and Uniwide
AMD took the opportunity at Computex to show
running the Quad-Core AMD Opteron processors, codenamed
, with the help of MSI, Supermicro, TYAN and Uniwide
The AMD quad-core processors are designed to drop-in (following a BIOS upgrade) with all existing AMD Opteron processor-based systems using DDR2 memory, while also enabling new platform capabilities such as those being demonstrated today.
One vendor demonstrated
, running at 1.6GHz. According to engineers familiar with the chip technology, the current AMD
samples are not scaling core frequencies well. AMD partners confirmed the highest running, POST and OS capable,
processor is 2.0 GHz. AMD previously posted benchmarks of a
simulated 2.6 GHz
“We commend AMD for its non-disruptive roadmaps, allowing for a smooth upgrade from dual-core to quad-core,” said Danny Hsu, president, TYAN. “Streamlining and mitigating the complexities customers often face when upgrading their IT infrastructure is especially important in today’s competitive marketplace. TYAN has collaborated with AMD since 2001, and we will continue to support and take advantage of the customer-centric innovation AMD is offering in its quad-core processors when they are made available later this year.”
AMD roadmaps show
-based Opteron processors will launch in July, but the general consensus from partners is the processor isn’t performing well enough for a July launch.
will launch later this summer, in the July, August kind of time frame -- followed by [consumer chips] on the desktop... You'll see that in the Christmas line-up,” stated Robert Rivet, AMD executive vice president and CFO, just a few months ago.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: One never ever knows.
6/7/2007 7:13:37 PM
Amd's faster 486 chip was the 5x86-133 which was about equaly to a pentium 66.
Sure AMD had faster 486 than Intel but by the time it came out the pentium was already out. They also had a faster 386 the 386-40. But that was actually a complete clone, just running faster.
The k6 really wasn't better than the Pentium it was maybe equiavlent and had a poorer FPU. the Pentium MMX 233 was faster than the k6-233 and at the time the k6-233 was overclocked at 3.2 volts compared to 2.9 for the k6-200 and 166 for .35 micron node. The Pentium MMX was much cooler running at the time (and at the time 35 watts TDP was a lot).
That said, it was competitive. By the time the k6-266 and 300 came out on .25 micron, the k6 was getting blown away by the pentium ii. And the Pentium II was head and shoulders above any k6-2 , the only thing really competitive was the super expensive and hard to find k6-3 chips or the few k6-2+ laptop chips.
So basically the entire k6 generation was not quite up to par / slightly behind. This was around the time that AMD was nearly bankrupt like now, and its stock fell to like $4-5. I remember I was a huge AMD fan boy and bought stock when I got out of high school.
the K7 was better than most p3s and earlier p4s until the northwood. That was around when AMD actually recovered out of their near bankruptcy around then the first german fab opened.
Also , for the reliability thing. HP was one of the first major OEMs to pick up AMD. Coincidentally I worked at an HP factory (since closed and moved to mexico btw) in california when they first got k6-2 300-350 chips.
The failure rate was easily 3 times as high for dead on arrival or chips that didnt quite perform to spec compared to the intel class equivalents (which were the celeron 300 a and 333 a in the systems we were refurbing / building).
That was a terrible summer job btw, but the AMD is not as reliable thing was definitely true back then. They were binning chips too high just to try to keep up with the Pentium III and Celeron As
"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer
Kanter: AMD Will Wipe the Floor with Intel for HPC
May 31, 2007, 10:49 AM
Rosewill Releases 3 New Powerline Networking Adapters
May 21, 2013, 4:29 PM
German Researchers Test 40 Gbps Wireless Broadband
May 21, 2013, 11:01 AM
Qualcomm, Samsung Push AMD to Fourth Place in Processor Market
May 21, 2013, 7:50 AM
Supermicro Looks to Shake Up Server Market
May 20, 2013, 9:00 PM
HiPerGator Supercomputer is Florida's Most Powerful Supercomputer
May 17, 2013, 7:08 AM
5/7/2013 Daily Hardware Reviews
May 7, 2013, 12:02 PM
Most Popular Articles
High School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds
May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM
Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues
May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM
Newegg Legal Chief: "We don't Feed the Trolls"; Defeats Bell Lab Shell Comp.
May 17, 2013, 10:11 AM
Former Intel CEO Regrets Passing Up on iPhone Gravy Train
May 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
NASA Awards $125,000 Grant for 3D Printed Food on Long-Term Space Travels
May 21, 2013, 1:32 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Sony "Teases" PS4 Ahead of Xbox Reveal in New Video
May 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nokia Introduces Instagram-Like App of Its Own to Help Lumia Sales
May 20, 2013, 7:10 AM
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information